this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
515 points (93.7% liked)

politics

19127 readers
5081 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 12 points 7 hours ago

Saying that whatever Trump does is political suicide misses the biggest issue with this election-

Nobody cares what either of them say because an awful lot of the electorate simply isn't listening.

The Trump voters would keep voting for Trump even if he joined the Nazi party. The rest of voters have either tuned out or are pushing Kamala simply because she's not Trump so she must be better.
An awful lot of people have just made up their minds and aren't listening for anything new.

So having a headline that Trump says something offensive is news to nobody. What would have been political suicide a decade or two ago is business as usual today. Whatever standards we once have politicians to, we no longer hold them to.

[–] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 7 hours ago

If this is what it takes to sink Trump's ship then I'll fully give up on ever making sense of anything ever again.

Don't get me wrong, that shit show was a national embarrassment, but it wasn't surprising.

Whatever. Vote, folks.

[–] LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Nothing is political suicide for Trump. He was right when he said he could shoot someone on 5th Ave and he wouldn't lose any supporters. His followers are a cult and the only way they would stop following him is if he somehow turned brown or black.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

He even said "take the guns now, proper process later" ad didn't even lost NRA support

[–] LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Obviously. The NRA is a racist organization more than a gun one if you actually scrutinize it.

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 19 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

If you still think anything trump could do is political suicide, you are too naive to be writing about politics.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 hours ago

It's the Daily Beast, afterall. Not even Wikipedia considers them reliable.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 15 points 12 hours ago

Saying that you could stand out in the middle of 5th avenue and shoot somebody dead I did not affect your campaign should equally have been political suicide.

Political suicide is dead.

[–] ano_ba_to@sopuli.xyz 11 points 12 hours ago

On the contrary, this is actually the strategy to win the swing voters. Some of them just need to be haters and they win bigly.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 115 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That man is politically immortal. There is nothing he can do to "commit political suicide".

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

He can lose, repeatedly. But that doesn't really end Trumpism. It just mutates the brand into Republicans who can pitch themselves as "winners".

A big problem with Lincoln Project Republicanism is that it doesn't refute the fundamental fascist tenants of Trumpism (the xenophobia, the white nationalist Christiandom, anti-Democratic sentiments). They just pitch Trump as on the wrong side of foreign policy (not hawkish enough on Russia or China).

So we end up with Trump on one end and Ted Cruz on the other, as our range of conservative options.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 4 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

aka "We've got Trump and Trump Lite, which would you prefer?"

[–] NotBillMurray@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

Do you guys have trump zero?

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Well what's the difference?

Same calories Same awful foam Same horrible aftertaste Same miserable aroma

But the light version says the quiet part quietly.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Things have definitely changed and there's republicans agitating to just blow it all up and start over. The old party wasn't great but it was at least loyal.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

there’s republicans agitating to just blow it all up and start ove

There are Republicans who lost their primaries and want their seats back. But they aren't going to throw away Reaganism to defeat Trumpism.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Everyone calls it Reagan, but he just did what Republicans were saying they wanted for decades already. In fact I'm not sure where the Republicans could fall back to ideologically. Ever since the Dixie Flip they've pretty much built their entire party around racism and religious extremism.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

In fact I’m not sure where the Republicans could fall back to ideologically.

At the heart of every Republican is a British Tory who desperately wants an American King.

Ever since the Dixie Flip they’ve pretty much built their entire party around racism and religious extremism.

Republicanism, even back to Lincoln, was a theory of Industrial expansion. Modern Republicans simply have nowhere else to expand into.

Racism and religious extremism are about re-colonizing the interior a second time, with a smaller and more "pure" cohort of settlers.

But without the large locus of dense population like the party had when it was dominant in the metropoles, that's increasingly difficult to accomplish.

What the GOP needs is a new Mecca (or, perhaps, a New New York). A large, population dense center of power to expand out of again. Maybe they've found that in Salt Lake City. Maybe they've found it in the increasingly right wing Texas capital of Austin. Or in Silicon Valley. Or in Tel Aviv. Maybe they'll rediscover New York (Eric Adams and Andrew Cuomo certainly suggest fascism still plays well in the Big Apple).

But Settler Colonialism 2 is the dream.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

A new Mecca? The f'n MAGATs should shove off to Moscow.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

That's an interesting way to look at it. I'm not sure they need a single city though, the analogy kind of falls apart if you take it too far. But the whole restricting voting rights to white Christian men married with kids could certainly be described as a new form of colonialism. It's essentially apartheid, and that was an outgrowth of colonialism.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago

I came to say something like "too bad this guy is a zombie, smells like one too."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mcteazy@sh.itjust.works 107 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Yeah if he was the title would’ve said, “Slammed”

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 72 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If he wins I swear I'm going to post a collage of these moronic article titles claiming gg ez a week before elections.

Feels 1:1 like 2016.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 84 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It wasn't the rape charges, or saying he wants to fuck his daughter, or saying immigrants are eating pets, or that people are getting abortions at 9 months, or trying to build that stupid fucking wall, or banning Muslims, or botching covid, or the insurrection, or calling on proud boys, or having meeting with Putin, or having meetings with Netanyahu, or...

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 11 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I will continue to say, and I mean no disrespect to you or anyone else who opposes this shitstain, the fact that he was President once and is very likely to be President again speaks volumes on who the American people are and it's not nice.

A large chunk of you think this man is a good representation of you on the world stage. Someone who is weak, overweight, obnoxious, loud, a bully, sexist, racist, I can go on. This is who a large chunk of Americans feel best represents them.

[–] JDPoZ@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

People are products of their environment.

A majority of this country did NOT vote for him. He never won the popular vote. He only won because assholes who crafted our systems of power did so to better serve the rich.

We are overweight because of our terrible deregulated food industry filled with garbage and our lack of walkable living spaces in most places Americans live. Hardly any place can be gotten to in the country with out a car.

We are uneducated because the rich have shaped our education system to remove any word about the Pullman Strike… about the original meaning of red-neck… about the bombing of Tulsa… as none of those things serve capital’s interests. So many Americans are angry because members from both major parties (with a few notable exceptions) mostly serve capital, which has allowed people’s material conditions to have worsened to a point that has ripened these same poorly-educated people for demagogues offering them easy scapegoats to shift the blame for their plight.

You can be angry, but to blame Americans for this is as if we have had much say kind of ignores what’s been happening here since at least Reagan’s time, if not longer.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Of course. I have always found it astonishing that anyone can behold DT and think he should be in charge of the country. Of course, same for Limbaugh or all the people in Fox who act like disingenuous assholes nonstop.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

..grab 'em by the pussy, or vets are suckers and losers, or his love letters with Kim, or his generals not being loyal like hitler's, or shoving light up the asses of covid victims, or bleach, or TAKING A SHARPIE TO A HURRICANE MAP, or never releasing his financial records, or his fucking health records, or...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 316 points 2 days ago (25 children)

The Madison Square Garden rally, operatic in its repulsive bigotry, will almost certainly alienate more voters who might have voted for Trump.

Will it really? Is there someone out there who didn't know until this event that he was a bigot and an awful person and is now going to change their mind?

[–] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 148 points 2 days ago (7 children)

You know what's crazy? That answer is almost certainly yes.

I live in a red area and more and more people are starting to see some cracks

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 100 points 2 days ago (7 children)

As great as that is to hear, I have to wonder under what rock those people have been living up to now.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 116 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I've lost count of how many "political suicides" Trump has allegedly gone through since 2015.... Yet somehow, here he still is...

My faith in humanity has been severely diminished by the fact his candidacy keeps surviving what in a sane world would be disqualifying events/revelations.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The Daily Beast is essentially Fox News for democrats, and I say this as a democrat. I wouldn’t take much of what they say seriously. Especially their sensationalist headlines.

[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean if 'grab em by the pussy' didn't do it...

Dude commits political suicide for breakfast daily. His voters don't care.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 136 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Unless people go out an vote, it won't be suicide. They're just pandering to their base. The Dems need to participate and not go on good feels a la 2016.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] peppers_ghost@lemmy.ml 74 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Donald Trump could walk around NYC naked and shrieking the n word and he wouldn't lose a single follower from his base. He's s got a cult of personality around him that is basically indestructible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IMNOTCRAZYINSTITUTION@lemmy.world 93 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I think trump could go on stage, strip naked, turn around and shotgun ass blast on the front row crowd and they'd still give their lives to vote for him

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Aeri@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Donald Trump has committed like, a couple dozen political suicides and stood back up, which is fucking alarming.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh come on "journalists", please stop with this "end of the Republican party" bullshit.

None of this will kill the white supremacist party because forty percent of America is still identifying as white supremacist and another ten percent literally can't tell the difference between someone quoting Hitler and someone Hitler was a genocidal asshole that shouldn't be looked up to and those morons vote in Pennsylvania.

The Republican party is perfectly fine after this yet another time example of Republicans being Nazi sympathizers holding a major public really where they proudly proclaim their White Nationalist opinions and agenda.

I think the only hope for getting rid of this bullshit strain of conservatism here and across the world is that they hold the same beliefs in the next global pandemic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

not a lot of voters will actually hear about this

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 51 points 1 day ago

Naïve article overall. Writers should know better than to prognosticate on what could actually hurt Trump's chances. But this is a fantastic line:

That was clear early on when Tony Hinchcliffe, a man invited by Trump to give one of the introductory speeches—who in true MAGA fashion alleged without providing a shred of evidence that he was a comedian

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago

Lol, mocking a disabled reporter, bragging about sexual assault, praising Hitler and trying to overturn an election wasn't political suicide, stop trying to predict last straws for his career, there is no bottom.

load more comments
view more: next ›