I can't fault him for any of his depth and character building and poetry and storytelling and descriptive environments it was all very thorough and for the right person wonderful. I think the movies did a giant justice to making his work accessible. There are a lot of people out there that can't manage to make their way through his poetry sections. And you can't not read the poetry sections because there's definitely content in there you need.
Especially at school.
Ubiquity routers have had blocking in them it's not a stretch to expand that out to other enterprise
The people here who want to fight you herehad a hand in installing those s*** heads in Iraq.
I use Linux because I don't trust windows, I don't like the direction Microsoft is headed, and I'm bored.
We're not the same either, but that's ok. We can still all have each other's backs.
Yes!
Probably a couple of times a year, some interesting product will catch my eye. It doesn't necessarily mean I'd be willing to buy the product. The last thing I clicked on was a yarbo ad. There's no way in hell I'm going to pay 5 to 10 grand for a robot tractor, but to be honest the thing looks pretty cool. I watch the entire ad did a quick search for pricing and what about my day. Now I'll probably see 420,000 different ads for it but that's okay it still looks pretty cool.
13 is a good "on call"/travel size. It's not big enough to do serious work on but in a pinch it's definitely big enough to get something done. It's more comfortable on a flight, you can toss it a fairly small bag and take it with you. It's lighter but can still manage a reasonable size keyboard. And when I get to my house or my job I'm plugging into external mouse and keyboard anyway.
It's not for everyone but my 13-in motherboard died about 2 months ago and I am definitely in the market. Now if I can just actually buy one of these we'll see.
It becomes impossible to block ads in all browsers new forks will be made and the features we want will happen. The bar to spin and maintain a new browser is high but it's not impossible on there are a lot of people that want this
You could make automatic breaking without a full blown computer, but it's so much cheaper to put a full-blown computer than it is to do it all in hardware. Everything uses turing complete equipment now, it's actually less expensive at this point.
There's absolutely no reason not to put multiple computers in the car I think the real win is not surfacing it to the end user.
Same I was dealing with a strange piece of software I searched configs and samples for hours and couldn't find anything about anybody having any problems with the weird language they use. I finally gave up and asked gpt, it explained exactly what was going wrong and gave me half a dozen answers to try to fix it.
I used to work in a company that was VC adjacent.
Most of the people sitting on piles of money don't have any knowledge or radar to help them negotiate where to put it. They lean heavily on other people to tell them what to invest in.
When AI first started getting big everybody was guessing where the curve was going to be and where the technology was going to head. The people guiding the venture capitalists were putting their oars in the water early.
To be fair there's a lot of money to be made in AI assistants if they can manage to run the back end affordably. If you're asking Google, Siri, and Alexa complicated questions they're miserably fit for the task. But when we get to the point where you can expect a reasonable answer from something like look up all the places to rent cars near Tucson Arizona give me the cheapest price with the best reviews. Or tutor my kid on basic calculus, test him, and give me a report on where he needs more assistance. That kind of stuff is worth money and something that many people with money will pay for.
This form factor is off-putting and honestly AI at this point is still only mostly right.
The VCs are all over AI and there's opportunity there. Just not on every product and probably not yet.
Nah, all the original data came from humans. If it was all good and happy and properly tagged correctly there'd be no intervention.
Unfortunately they scraped it from wherever in the hell they could get it from and it's not all tagged correctly.
I'm sure they use more AI to pre-grade it, but at some point a set of real eyes need to verify that something is what it's supposed to be.
This is more of a blood diamonds or fair trade coffee thing, US legislation isn't going to have anything to do with it. You need to expose the places using the data.
Selection process is random but the challenge process keeps it white noise. They're each going to throw away a set number of people that are bad for their side. In the end it ends up being kind of random still anyway.