this post was submitted on 07 May 2024
720 points (98.5% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26801 readers
3143 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 200 points 6 months ago (3 children)
[–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 63 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] pigup@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Uh oh, something magical is about to happen

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 61 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How long has this guy been staring at Uranus?

[–] DosDude@retrolemmy.com 23 points 6 months ago

I don't know, but I'm cramping up.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 90 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Ursanus is boring to look at.

My anus is not.

We are not the same.

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 49 points 6 months ago (1 children)

My anus is not.

NASA-grade pics or STFU

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Color-enhanced or bleached?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FozzyOsbourne@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago

Ursanus

You had one job!

[–] fritobugger2017@lemmy.world 84 points 6 months ago (4 children)

looks like someone bleached Uranus

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

Let me do some deep delving to ascertain the truth of this and I'll get back to you

[–] KAYDUBELL@lemm.ee 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] neutron@thelemmy.club 8 points 6 months ago

It's really awkward explaining this joke in other languages.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 60 points 6 months ago (2 children)

TFW your friends think you're not cool anymore because you're actually white

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 58 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Yeah so maybe both Neptune and Uranus look hazy and dull green in visible light. So what?! They're both entire worlds, significantly larger and vastly different in climate and tilt and composition and weather phenomena than our own, and we're lucky enough to have seen them up close with probes. They have layered structure that can be seen in other wavelengths (e.g. infrared) and so many mysteries we haven't yet conceived. Plus a ton of moons each that are weird and fascinating in their own right. They're not the least bit boring to a curious mind.

[–] stembolts@programming.dev 31 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Plus they are gas planets. Fart miners are about to be rich with farts.
Your welcome for this contribution of taste and intellect.

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago

Honestly it's the shitpost community so kinda fitting. Too bad your miners won't find much stinky sulfur after their decade+ journey.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 15 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Your comment formed a perfect pressure waveform.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Respiratory therapists only think about one thing and it's disgusting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 54 points 6 months ago

When the developers thought their model was so far out of the potential view distance of the player they didn't bother making a texture for it.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 39 points 6 months ago (3 children)

How did it take until 2023 to discern the true color of a planet we've known about since before humans found Antarctica?

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 62 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Serious answer: the sensors in telescopes and probes don't work exactly like human eyes. They pick up a different range of frequencies than our cone cells in the first place, and don't have the same sort of overlapping input curves. There's a lot of tricks and techniques in converting an image into the same sort of thing we'd see with the naked eye. You can sorta think of it like translating Japanese into English; there's no perfect formula and it requires some creative interpretation no matter what.

The popular images that get published all over are simplistic composites and never really reflect the actual data astronomers rely on, so that was never a hindrance to scientific progress. It suddenly made the news because a research group decided to reevaluate the old data and reinterpret it against calibrations from other equipment (e.g. Voyager probe vs. the Very Large Telescope here on Earth). There's a general interest factor in "wow that looks so much different than the old pictures", when the underlying data really hasn't changed.

[–] Skua@kbin.social 37 points 6 months ago (1 children)

To add to this, we apparently always knew. The famous blue image is more or less the correct hue, but the saturation has been absolutely blown out like a clickbait youtube thumbnail in order to show faint features more clearly. Somewhere along the line we stopped mentioning that that had been done. Irwin and co just just re-calculated it to get the most accurate version yet, because we've got a lot more data to work with now than we did back when Voyager 2 did its fly-by

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 18 points 6 months ago

Furthermore, it's not that the original scientists failed to produce true-color images. The original published images of Neptune had deliberately enhanced colors to better show some of the features of the cloud surface, and the description text of the images said as much. But that nuance was quickly forgotten and everybody just took the deep blue coloring to reflect the actual color of the planet, which spread to depictions of the planet everywhere.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 34 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Similar reason why these three photos look like slightly different colors: image sensor type, quality, and postprocessing.

Older images, less accurate. Especially if the type of image a system is capturing is not meant to be consistent with the human eye.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

According to a study 97% of scientists are color blind!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 36 points 6 months ago
[–] dessimbelackis@lemmy.world 34 points 6 months ago

Uranus can actually be quite fun if you know what you’re doing

[–] FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago

literally an entire planet

”it’s boring because of colour!”

[–] lath@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago

TFW you thought you were cool, but it turns out you had a yee yee ass haircut all along.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 22 points 6 months ago

Just like jeans, the more you wash it, the more it fades.

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Don't plain-shame, being basic is okay too

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thirstyhyena@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Looks like those old mouse balls.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The bodies of the solar system arents trying except for Jupiter, Saturn, and Earth

Look at this eyesore.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 12 points 6 months ago

Made by the Jupiter gang.

[–] PenisWenisGenius@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 6 months ago (10 children)

Nasa is ruining every planet one-by-one. First pluto wasn't a planet. Then neptune is even more boring and stupid than previously thought. Next thing we know, Mars isn't a planet anymore because planets aren't red.

[–] FozzyOsbourne@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago

Mars isn't even red, it's sort of brown

[–] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 6 months ago (8 children)

Technically the concept of a planet is a social construct. Scientists have been scurrying around redefining the definition of a planet to exclude asteroids ever since they discovered them. Why can't they just say that the Earth is a wet asteroid and be done with it?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] omega_x3@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Well I mean why is Mercury still a planet? It didn't clear it's own orbit, it just happens to be in an empty orbit.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago
[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I guess as long as we're talking about Uranus I don't need to correct your boring ass

to boring-ass.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›