76

I know Lemmy isn't normally the best place to search for this, but are there any high-quality right-wing explainers, or modern books, or media outlets?

I myself am ultra-left (quite literally communist, to the dictionary sense of the word), but I'd like to quit the bubble that inevitably forms around and look at good arguments of the opposing side, if there are any.

Is there anything in there beyond temporarily embarrassed millionaires and fears that trans people will destroy humanity? Is there rational analysis, something closer to academic research, behind modern ideas of laissez-faire capitalism and/or political conservatism?

I've tried outlets like PragerU, but they are so basic they seem to target a very uncritical audience.

I'd like to see the world in the eyes of an enlightened right-winger, and see where they possibly fail (or if suddenly they have valid arguments).

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 76 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yes! I've been on this journey!

Thomas Sowell's bibliography is easily the best starting place. Just pick something and have at it. As a prominent conservative economist, his books actually make good arguments. It takes actual effort to deconstruct his arguments and identify where he's wrong. He's widely and highly respected in conservative communities and tackles a lot of the common cultural war issues.

Then there's granddaddies Milton Friedman and F.A. Hayek. Also economists, they were directly impacted by the Cold War, and make intellectual cases that capitalism is the only economic system that leads to real individual freedom. And they also try to prove why the totalitarianism of the Soviet Union and every lesser species of it undermines liberty. Hayek's Road to Serfdom and Friedman's Capitalism and Freedom are staples.

Castigated by modern conservatives because they're not serious about anything, sociology's Emile Durkheim is a cornerstone of the discipline. I've never read it, but his book *Suicide *concerns individuals within community and the institutions of it. He talks about a type of suicide derived from moral disorder and lack of clarity, anomic suicide.

One book that I found incredibly insightful was Yuval Levin's The Great Debate: Edmund Burke, Thomas Paine, and the Birth of Right and Left. This book is genuinely fair to both sides, and it shows the historical roots of conservatism and its relation to the French Revolution, when the right and the left as political stances first became a thing.

[-] MyPornViewingAccount@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago

OP, this guy has given you an honest answer that is actually good material.

Seconding these recommendations.

[-] Retiring@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago

Love the name

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 13 points 2 weeks ago

Wow, thank you for such a detailed response!

I'll check out the sources you've given.

[-] applepie@kbin.social 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Thomas Sowell is an american pseudo intelectual...

A lot of his analysis doesn't hold any water if reviewed in context of the world.

He is essentially doing the bidding for the regime which I guess what "conservatives" do but he is disingenius IMHO sort of Ben Shapiro type of lapdog telling working peasants sucks to suck, git gud.

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 6 points 2 weeks ago

While I don't disagree exactly, the way he puts his arguments is far better than Shapiro. Reading or listening to Sowell is a lesson in uncovering sophisticated conservative arguments. It took me a while to understand how Sowell reasoned, so that's why I include him and think he's a great example of conservative thinkers.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

And they also try to prove why the totalitarianism of the Soviet Union and every lesser species of it undermines liberty.

Proving totalitarianism undermines liberty seems pretty trivial to me. An attempt to prove that communism must necessarily be totalitarian would be much more interesting.

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, that's what they do and say.

[-] Omniraptor@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

iirc Friedman changed his mind about the welfare state later in life

Frankly, anything explicitly marketed to American conservatives these days is mostly ragebait for stupid people and I doubt you'll find any of it the least bit convincing. As other have mentioned, Thomas Sowell is a great place to start if you want something serious but modern and clearly written. Milton Friedman's Free to Choose or Capitalism and Freedom are both widely recommended classics. If you managed to read Marx without dying of boredom you should also be able to get through Ludwig von Mises' Human Action or Socialism.

[-] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

Describes PragerU. I follow their YouTube and Instagram accounts and it’s almost exclusively bad faith arguments or rage bait.

99% of the comments buy into it as well. I wonder if they’re quick to clean up (read:remove) dissenting voices or if it is actually an echo chamber.

Are you punishing yourself for something?

[-] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Haha. Just want to better understand how the other side sees the world.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ours@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I only saw a YouTuber make fun of their "Christopher Columbus did nothing wrong video" (not the actual title).

Their argumentation is terribly weak.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Thomas Sowell is a great place to start

My man was churning out ragebait before ragebait was cool.

Who lost Iraq? Look to Obama

Milton Friedman’s Free to Choose or Capitalism and Freedom are both widely recommended classics.

Mr. Pencil Man, the guy who was convinced a command economy couldn't churn out writing implements because they had too many parts.

If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there’d be a shortage of sand.

Is one of my favorite Friedmanisms. My guy simply could not conceive of a central authority doing anything right (unless that thing was standing up military juntas in formerly democratic Latin American and Middle Eastern states).

If you managed to read Marx without dying of boredom you should also be able to get through Ludwig von Mises’ Human Action or Socialism.

He's got some bangers.

Children and Rights

Applying our theory to parents and children, this means that a parent does not have the right to aggress against his children, but also that the parent should not have a legal obligation to feed, clothe, or educate his children, since such obligations would entail positive acts coerced upon the parent and depriving the parent of his rights. The parent therefore may not murder or mutilate his child, and the law properly outlaws a parent from doing so. But the parent should have the legal right not to feed the child, i.e., to allow it to die.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago

Thanks! Marx is sometimes tough indeed, but readable :D

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MyPornViewingAccount@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

If youre being honest, then youre going to need to look at historical material like Locke & Hobbes to get a foundation.

Modern conserativism... aggitation... can bw traced through Gingrich in the House in the early 90s, I cant think of the book off the top of my head but theres a pretty decent record of how he did manipulative things with unmanned cspan cameras at the time.

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

This. Perhaps even some "Wealth of Nations" and similar.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

It partly depends on whether you want to understand pre-9/11 "reasonable" conservatism or the more recent Tea Party and Trump conservative populism.

Ayn Rand expresses the fairy tale version of romantic, rugged individualism, which is pretty important to understanding modern right-wing politics, especially in North America. I think the main idea conservatives take from her work, directly or indirectly, is that progress is driven by individual work and achievement, and that any kind of forced wealth re-distribution (through social programs, for example) is effectively theft, and therefore immoral.

The modern populist right-wing movement was originally driven and disseminated by right-wing talk radio hosts like Rush Limbaugh. So, listening to right-wing talk radio or podcasts is also a good window into the modern movement. It puts on full display the resentment felt by modern right-wingers.

If you would rather not experience right-wing media directly, but would rather read rational analysis about it, then one good choice is David Frumm. He is an old school Reagan/Bush conservative, and has lived through the transition of the Repubs to populism. He is very critical of Trumpism, like most people, but he comes from the perspective of a reasonable and well-informed conservative insider.

Fareed Zakaria has a new book called Age of Revolutions, which views modern conservative populism as a very significant political re-alignment with similarities to various revolutions of the past, both successful and unsuccessful. Fareed talks about the conditions that lead to populism. In that sense, he treats Trump's popularity as a symptom and outcome of specific underlying societal problems.

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Thank you! I'd like to understand both, really, though my first concern is about modern, "Trump" conservatism.

[-] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 12 points 2 weeks ago

Others have weighed in on the academic, but a lot of the American conservative braintrust is (literally) in think tanks like the Heritage Foundation, Federalist Society, John Birch Society, etc. These organizations vary from "pretty right wing" Heritage to "nearly literally fascist" John Birch Society, and they put out a LOT of papers and material they use to...I'll generously say "inform" the public discourse.

[-] folkrav@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

There’s an episode of Behind the Bastards touching on the subject - “How Conservatism Won”. Not a right-wing resource at all, obviously, but that’s where a lot of the money goes indeed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Allero@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago

Thanks! Will check them out. Useful to get closer to sources everyday conseratives lean to

[-] djsoren19@yiffit.net 5 points 2 weeks ago

Have you already read through Plan 2025? It's kinda the latest huge report from the Heritage Foundation, and I'd say it does a pretty good job of outlining modern right-wing ideology. It can definitely be a hard read though, some of the things they want are really stomach churning to me.

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago

Planned to go take a read, didn't do it yet

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 weeks ago

Here's an audio copy of Murray Rothbard's Man, Economy, and State. Murray is basically the father of "right wing" libertarianism (insofar as right v left is individualism v collectivism, not "right=racism is good,") he seems to fit the description you seek. Not saying you'll agree or love him, but he isn't some "lets kill the gays" nonsense.

Also try Milton Friedman, and Lysander Spooner. They're more "anarchism" or "libertarianism" as well, from that same individualist, rather than collectivist, standpoint.

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 6 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not here to love these people, I'm here to hear them out :D Thanks!

[-] Siegfried@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Please dont have sex with milton, ok?

[-] Forester@yiffit.net 10 points 2 weeks ago

Foundations of geopolitics by Aleksander Dugan. This is the basis of modern European, conservative actions and the Russian playbook for the last 30 years.

[-] MyPornViewingAccount@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

The Road to Unfreedom: Russia, Europe, America https://a.co/d/5pCJwnr

This would probably be better for an american reader. Theyre not gonna get the cultural underpinnings of 'Foundations' without reading an analysis and I dont think this is what OP is looking for. Foundations is Russian international relations theory.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] db2@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

an enlightened right-winger

If they still exist they aren't putting themselves in the (probably literal) crosshairs of the conservative/christianist goofballs.

It's been actual decades since the right wing was anything approaching sane. The left is following suit lately too.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Ahh yes, a classic "both sides" argument.

Please, explain how the left has gone crazy with their ideology, because leftists don't have much political power to actually mess anything up with, unlike conservatives.

[-] ReallyKinda@kbin.social 9 points 2 weeks ago

This is not a right wing resource, but if you’re interested in learning about the arguments and historical evolution of ideas that underpin economic liberalism/neoliberalism, I highly recommend Geoff Mann’s Disassembly required : a field guide to actually existing capitalism. It’s concise, relatively short, and treats the ‘other’ side like rational actors (which is important for understanding, I think).

Ofc this would only help understand people who are quite well informed.

https://archive.org/details/isbn_9781849351270

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Alimentar@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago

I find the Austrian School of Economics really interesting.

Particularly books written by American economist Murray Rothbard, who talks about free markets, government (particularly government intervention) and inflation.

There's a very short book you can read called "What has Government Done to Our Money?”

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

If I recall from the Alt-Right Playbook's Origins of Conservatism video, some of the early founders of conservative thought you might want to read include:

  • Edmund Burke
  • Thomas Hobbes
  • Joseph DeMaistre
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] tjhart85@kbin.social 4 points 2 weeks ago

I don't know if you like podcasts, but Know Your Enemy is a take on the right from two leftists who used to be conservatives who approach it from an intellectual POV.

I linked to the political magazine that helps support them since it gives some rundowns of their topics that might give you some of the sources that can be read instead of listening to their podcast, if you'd prefer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] aasatru@kbin.earth 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Robert Nozick's Anarchy, State and Utopia is a solid philosophical foundation for a lot of right wing thought. If you want to engage further you can follow up with Michael Otsuka's critique in Self-Ownership and Equality: A Lockean Reconciliation.

Nozick provides an underpinning for what many think of as traditional conservative American values, without basing it in Christianity.

Then of course there's the Chicago school of economics (Friedman et al), which is just a somewhat naive and more it less completely discredited take on how the economy works. It's fundamental for understanding American politics the previous half century, but their ideas are not really worth interacting with unless you're particularly interested in economics. It's not like the idiot politicians who push it in front of them understand the theories either.

Thsee theories is not far right; there's no salvaging the far right, and their ideological basis is mostly just bigotry. You could read Ayn Rand to try to understand which hole these idiots crawled from. Or better, don't waste your time.

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago

I see! Actually, I think I should touch Ayn Rand at some point to get more popular sentiment - in modern times, her books, particularly Atlas Shrugged, seem to be the Bible of common liberals.

[-] aasatru@kbin.earth 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, you're probably right it's worth reading if you want to understand the American right. I just don't think Atlas Shrugged is anywhere near as interesting as Anarchy, State and Utopia from a history of ideas perspective, but that might not be the relevant dimension. :)

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm not sure of you'll find the academic research you are looking for, at least out of the US, since the modern Conservative movement seems to have eschewed academia as filled with Liberals.

I haven't read this book yet, but I'd recommend Hillbilly Elegy, a memoir about JD Vance's life in Appalachia, It came out in 2016, and I recall folks thinking that it was a good read, even if they didn't agree with Vance's politics, and partially explained Trump's appeal to rural voters whose lifestyle bears no resemblance at all to Trump. The book has to be somewhat compelling, since Ron Howard made a movie out of it. And Vance parlayed it into a Senate seat, after all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Skua@kbin.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

I will have to preface this with the fact that I have not read any of his books, but former British politician Rory Stewart is one of the people that comes to my mind when reading your description. I don't think that he comes to the right policy positions, of course, but whenever I listen to him he does seem to at least have a degree of empathy for all people. He seems to at least generally see the problem even if I think that his solution wouldn't work. He has an effective way with words in interviews and his writing is generally very well reviewed too.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Gigan@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

The first name that came to mind was Thomas Sowell

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Maybe read something from Jordan Peterson? He's conservative, against gender politics or modern life. Sells 'simple truths' that look well reasoned if you're not too intelligent (or don't believe in equality...) I think he wrote several books and has lots of YouTube videos available.

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Peterson seemed more pretentious than competent to me.

As you well said, "look well-reasoned if you're not too intelligent"

But thanks!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
76 points (81.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

33698 readers
532 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS