this post was submitted on 19 May 2024
227 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19103 readers
4632 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Republican senator’s comments come as he is considered among Trump’s top candidates for vice-president

The Republican Florida senator Marco Rubio said on Sunday he would not commit to accepting the 2024 presidential election results, insisting that “if it’s unfair” his party will “go to court and point out the fact that states are not following their own election laws”.

Rubio’s statements on Meet the Press come as he is considered among former president Donald Trump’s top candidates for vice-president. Trump has continuously said falsely that the 2020 election was stolen.

Those claims spurred the 6 January 2021 insurrection, during which participants stormed the Capitol building as lawmakers were in the midst of certifying the election results. Trump is facing a variety of charges related to alleged election meddling.

all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 86 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Theyre gearing up another January 6, mark my words

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Only if Trump doesn't win. Then it's not necessary.

[–] chetradley@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Even if he wins the EC, he'll still question the popular vote results.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 62 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

V.P. Candidate Checklist:

✅ Deny 2020 election results.

✅ Deny 2024 election results in advance

✅ Kiss Trump’s ass.

✅ Lose your soul if you ever had one.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Dude gets called “Little Marco” for a months by Trump, and he’s still chortling his balls. People like him are so desperate for power that they will happily give up their self respect.

[–] normanwall@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] chase_what_matters@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

This is one of my favorite photos ever. Just the perfect representation of the modern Republican Party.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

Nobody who ever had a soul would ever agree to be Donald's VP.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 39 points 6 months ago (2 children)

obviously it's only fair if Trump wins like he says. Otherwise it's just rigged if he doesn't win

[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 17 points 6 months ago

That's exactly how Trump thinks, whenever he calls things unfair it's just regular crap but everything is unfair if they don't get their desired outcome. The mental gymnastics are absolutely amazing with these people. If we could turn that into an energy source we could get off of oil. Likewise with their projection, though we'd need to limit the size of screen they'd produce otherwise we could only make out a nose hair at best.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 15 points 6 months ago

Hell, Trump whined that 2016 was rigged even though he won the electoral college.

[–] nnullzz@lemmy.world 31 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah because it’s that easy right?! Dr tells me I have cancer, I’ll just not accept the diagnosis because it’s unfair. Problem solved, cancer gone!

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Apropos, because the Rs are pretty much a cancer on the nation and it's people.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago

Reality doesn't give a shit what you accept.

[–] Mastengwe@lemm.ee 22 points 6 months ago (1 children)

News flash: to them, it’ll only be fair if they win.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

And their rampant voter suppression makes it unfair by default.

[–] MamboGator@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

Now ask him if he would consider any election where republicans lost to be "fair."

[–] Blackout@kbin.run 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like a spoiled child

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Fuckface 45 is that shitty kid who always changed the rules of the game right as he was about to lose.

His few friends were the ones who accepted the changes and stuck around.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"time out!"
*Runs*
"Time in!"

[–] 5wim 1 points 6 months ago

slips, trips, and falls out of the grape-stomping bucket and tumbles off the elevated platform "Ooo, oooo, ooo-"

I wish our national standards were not so low, because from a different perspective, it's great that these people are self-identifying as power-corrupted fascists. Usually they hide it and we have to guess.

I really cannot understand how 40% of voters see a rejection of democratic elections as a qualification to run a democracy.

[–] TheJims@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Marco Rubio is afraid of trump and his childish nicknames.

[–] snownyte@kbin.social 8 points 6 months ago

Republicans NEVER accepted election results unless THEY won.

It's nothing unique to 2020. It was only a big deal because of fatass Trump.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Surprised none of them have said the constitution should be followed, as long as it's convenient to their ends.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Guy putting his thumb on the scale: "nobody better put their thumb on this scale!"

[–] Dreizehn@kbin.social 4 points 6 months ago

The only election result the Government of Fucking Putin would accept is a 87% popular vote win like in shithole Russia.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

I wonder if he considers it unfair to have the antiquated slavery-era EC choose a candidate over the popular vote.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And he gets to pick which data supports his desired outcome.

[–] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

If you torture the data enough, it will confess.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Hey hey let’s give Little Marco a break, okay - he’s very dehydrated!

[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

As if it would matter to anyone.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Did you guys see Chris Sununu fully bend over backwards, collapsing his face fully into Trump's ass cheeks to defend his endorsement despite going full 180 from his words not 2 years ago? That man should join the circus with flexibility like that.

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Would he like a wah-burger to go with his French cries?

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 6 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Republican Florida senator Marco Rubio said on Sunday he would not commit to accepting the 2024 presidential election results, insisting that “if it’s unfair” his party will “go to court and point out the fact that states are not following their own election laws”.

Rubio’s statements on Meet the Press come as he is considered among former president Donald Trump’s top candidates for vice-president.

Those claims spurred the 6 January 2021 insurrection, during which participants stormed the Capitol building as lawmakers were in the midst of certifying the election results.

He also refused to criticize Trump for his comments on Florida’s six-week abortion ban, during which Trump called the law a “terrible thing, a terrible mistake” – despite also repeatedly claiming credit for overturning the federal protection for abortion.

“I support any bill that protects unborn human life, but I don’t consider other people in the pro life movement who have a different view to be apostate,” said Rubio, who has long pushed for strict limits on abortion.

We are not like the Democrats where, unless you are in favor of their bills that basically say, ‘Let’s just put in all this fancy language, but it’s not meaningful in terms of any restrictions.’”


The original article contains 473 words, the summary contains 204 words. Saved 57%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!