goferking0

joined 1 year ago
[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago

Why are they integrating unrwa workers???

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago

I've gotten the same from dnc, just without the picture of a person on it

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Treating others like a child and being a pedantic asshole will usually get you that response.

It's amazing how many words you use to also say nothing

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Fuck off back to reddit

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago (6 children)

A 2018 year-in-review and prospective on fact-checking from the Poynter Institute (which develops PolitiFact[27]) noted a proliferation of credibility score projects, including Media/Bias Fact Check, writing that "While these projects are, in theory, a good addition to the efforts combating misinformation, they have the potential to misfire," and stating that "Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific."[6] Also in 2018, a writer in the Columbia Journalism Review described Media Bias/Fact Check as "an armchair media analysis"[28] and characterized their assessments as "subjective assessments [that] leave room for human biases, or even simple inconsistencies, to creep in".[29] A study published in Scientific Reports wrote: "While [Media Bias/Fact Check's] credibility is sometimes questioned, it has been regarded as accurate enough to be used as ground-truth for e.g. media bias classifiers, fake news studies, and automatic fact-checking systems."[19]

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago (8 children)

I'm trying to summarize the wiki reasoning/what's in the wiki page about mbfc criticisms

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago (10 children)

They're saying the parts mbfc uses other data from is fine, like the fact checking matching others as they all use the same source. But the rest like bias can't be trusted as it's just their own unscientific methods.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 days ago

They could just do it because of the attacks Israel is doing against UN personnel and institution/agencies if they want to wait for it to legally be ruled a genocide.

Or because they keep openly being against any diplomatic efforts.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 days ago

Better places to find planes lol

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 31 points 5 days ago

Watch it'll again be those who work forces

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

And nothing of value was lost

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 days ago

Yeah but they totally don't let their bias influence their decisions to make it that way...the teams for it

https://lemmy.world/comment/12710812

 

Lemmy political Memes only seems to care about ignoring genocide and punishing those calling out uncivil accounts. Also more interested in banning those they don't like then locking posts due to reporting then actually moderating posts.

Mods log.

https://lemmy.world/modlog/1384

Examples of terrible removals and bans

And they leave up comments with baseless accusations

https://lemmy.world/comment/12116405

 

Reposting cause mods didn't ~~let me know title needed to be changed from less charged title DNC Delegate Attacked for Gaza Protest Banner Supports Harris~~

Follow own rules for comm

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

view more: next ›