In that they won't have any meaningful regulating done to them or suffer any actual consequences despite the obviously evil shit of which they're plainly guilty?

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago

Yes.

[-] lanolinoil@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

This is the Gilded Age II: Electric Boogaloo

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

AI boogaloo

[-] slurpinderpin@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago

Hahahahaha fuck Elon

[-] resetbypeer@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago

Waiting for tsla stock to go up now...

[-] 1984@lemmy.today 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I can't believe it's still at 170+. People must really not realize that the first mover advantage is over, and Tesla has had their moment already. They are not going to lead this change to evs. Most manufacturers have good or better electric cars now.

Also people can't afford them. Current prices are ridiculous. The company that brings low price evs that are good enough will dominate the market the next 5 years. It won't be Tesla.

[-] resetbypeer@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

The fact that a single company is higher valued than the entire car market should ring all alarm bells. Because afaik is Mercedes already ahead of Tesla in regarding (autonomous) self driving. But don't quote me on it.

[-] SeedyOne@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"The market" (stocks) has been and will continue to be divorced from reality but to play devil's advocate, Tesla and it's investors consider it "more than just a car company". It's still ridiculous, but that's the market for ya.

[-] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Mercedes "full self driving" is only on designated routes.

[-] pup_atlas@pawb.social 37 points 1 week ago

Investigate it? The dude literally named it “autopilot”, what is there to investigate, they market this explicitly in their advertising.

[-] Grippler@feddit.dk 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There are several things to attack on the Tesla autopilot, the name being the least of the misleading marketing, and honestly a bit stupid to focus on.

The dude has claimed for close to a decade now, that (FSD) "is right around the corner!"... "It's coming end of the year" and shit like that. That is significantly more misleading than a product name (autopilot) that is about the same level of misleading as other manufacturers names for similar functionality.

They have not claimed autopilot to be any more than a driver assistance feature, and it has always been marketed separately from the FSD package.

[+] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev -33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

What do you think autopilot does in a plane that would make this misleading?

[-] JamesFire@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

What layman is familiar with the actual technical ability of aircraft autopilot?

[-] Entropywins@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Press the button and whammy autopilot?

[-] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 0 points 1 week ago

In that case, why would it be more misleading than Cruise Control?

[-] pup_atlas@pawb.social 18 points 1 week ago

Autopilot maintains altitude and bearing between waypoints in the sky, and in some (ideal) situations can automatically land the aircraft. In terms of piloting an aircraft, it can handle the middle of the journey entirely autonomously, and even sometimes the end (landing).

Autopilot (the Telsa feature) is not rated to drive the car autonomously, requires constant human supervision, and can automatically disengage at any time. Despite being sold as an “autonomous driver”, it cannot function as one, like autopilot on a plane can. It is clearly using the autopilot feature of an aircraft to imply that the car can pilot itself through at least the middle of the journey without direct supervision (which it can’t). That is misrepresentation.

[-] CodeInvasion@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

I am a pilot and this is NOT how autopilot works.

There is some autoland capabilities in the larger commercial airliners, but autopilot can be as simple as a wing-leveler.

The waypoints must be programmed by the pilot in the GPS. Altitude is entirely controlled by the pilot, not the plane, except when on a programming instrument approach, and only when it captures the glideslope (so you need to be in the correct general area in 3d space for it to work).

An autopilot is actually a major hazard to the untrained pilot and has killed many, many untrained pilots as a result.

Whereas when I get in my Tesla, I use voice commands to say where I want to go and now-a-days, I don’t have to make interventions. Even when it was first released 6 years ago, it still did more than most aircraft autopilots.

[-] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This. But I think it's better to use marine autopilot system as a comparison - aircraft autopilots are closely monitored by three people (two in the cockpit, one on the ground as air traffic control) and they are combined with all sorts of other automated systems such as ground proximity alerts/etc. Not really comparable to a car.

Autopilot in a boat traditionally just turns the steering wheel for you. And all it does is maintain a desired direction of travel. Not even a destination, just a direction. So when (not if) wind or currents steer you off course, you will have to take over the steering wheel. It also doesn't control speed. All it does, really, is allow you to keep travelling in approximately the right direction.

There are more advanced systems, but that's traditionally how autopilot works. It's very primitive and has been in use for over a hundred years.

Having said that, Tesla hasn't just used the word "autopilot". They also repeatedly refer to their system as "Full Self Driving". And it kinda does that, as long as there isn't a fire truck in the way.

[-] CodeInvasion@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Agreed.

Nevertheless, the Federal regulators will have an uphill battle as mentioned in the article.

Neither "puffery" nor "corporate optimism" counts as fraud, according to US courts, and the DOJ would need to prove that Tesla knew its claims were untrue.

The big thing they could get Tesla on is the safety record for autosteer. But again there would need to be proof it was known.

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Elon, suddenly: I'm really concerned about what is going on in Palestine.

[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Im sure they'll get a fine that's .000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001% of their daily profits

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Notice how no other car makers overstepped that boundary because they aren't desperate for PR attention.

[-] Dremor@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

The miniature is god tier. 🤣

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Good

this post was submitted on 08 May 2024

617 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

54319 readers

2779 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 11 months ago

MODERATORS