this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
72 points (95.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43685 readers
2625 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Please don't think I'm here to complain about rizz or skibidi toilet etc. Thats all fine by me.

The term I dislike strongly is 'eeeh' before you make a statement disagreeing with someone. (This is over text only). Now maybe I've been pavloved bc it's always used by someone disagreeing. But I'm happy with people disagreeing with me normally its just the 'eeeh' or 'erm' that annoys me.

So what's a random term that annoys you?

PS. Saying "eeeh actually 'eeh' is a perfectly fine term" would be a ridiculously easy joke and I will judge you for making it. And I know atleast one person will. Especially bow that I've said all this.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 1 points 28 minutes ago
[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 1 points 30 minutes ago (1 children)

"For me"

I know it's your opinion because you're the one saying it. And the construction of it is just weird. "For" me. I dunno.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 21 minutes ago

on the internet everything is true. therefore if you don't preface your thoughts with "CW: opinion" your writing permanently alters reality and people will be angry at you for inconveniencing them.

imho.

[–] AnarchistArtificer 1 points 37 minutes ago

"teachers who interact with middle schoolers; our frontline troops facing the bleeding edge of internet memespeak."

Reason number 201 why teachers are underpaid

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Every stupid phrase that redditors compulsively say on every thread.

[–] rothaine@beehaw.org 1 points 43 minutes ago
[–] MattMatt@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Utilize, when they mean Use.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 hours ago

I recently heard someone say after they almost accidentally went in a wrong building entrance, "Good thing I didn't do that or I would regret my life choices."

A bit much for something minor that created no more than two seconds of awkwardness.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

“Beloved” in so many articles. Yes I tend to use a specific browser. No, it is not and never will be “beloved”.

That word is so jarring most of the time and seems to be everywhere online in the last two years. I can only assume it’s some sort of SEO, trying to convince Google it’s a personal article or something. I hope to god it’s not ai assuming that’s what attracts our attention

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 1 points 3 hours ago

Not specifically a word, but i hate when people mix english with their native language

Its especially worse when they use words that are nearly identical

[–] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

"It is what it is."

It is lazy, circular, a cop out and means next to nothing. Vague enough to pass as a wise quip, to some. It is not.

Also not so much a saying per sé, but people who use quotes of famous people at the bottom or ends of emails. As if that implies a personality. If you are going to use something you think sounds smart, at least try to come up with that something yourself.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago

This one is mine too. It's used in a way that can give it more meaning (mainly, this is something out of our control), but logically the phrase is just corpo filler-speak that means absolutely nothing.

[–] akkajdh999@programming.dev 2 points 5 hours ago
[–] miracleorange@beehaw.org 5 points 6 hours ago

Kiddos, especially when used by people in professions that work with kids. Right up there with people who unironically say pupper or doggo. Just say kids.

[–] ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Enshittification. Everyone just learned a new word and has to use it at least once in every comment section to feel smart.

[–] AnarchistArtificer 3 points 1 hour ago

I'm also sick of it, but I also sort of like how it's gone viral. I had a very non-techy friend mention it to me the other day. I feel like most of the people who I see talking about it are jazzed because it makes them feel seen. My friend, for example, said to me that before she learned of "enshittification", she felt like she was going mad because of how things don't seem to work like they used to, especially in tech; she said that for the longest time, she had assumed it must be something that she was doing wrong.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 hours ago

Marxists have a hundred years of text dedicated to alienation from labor, the falling rate of profit, degeneration of art and creative disciplines under later capitalism due to the profit motive, cycles of class struggle, all based on a materialist analysis of changing production and class relationsi

But for some reason a trendy term like enshittification that vaguely means things are getting worse, without going into the basis about why they're currently getting worse, has caught on.

I'm convinced it's part of the tech grifter trend to take things that were already invented, slap a new name on it, repackage it, and sell it.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

But yet it explains so much about the modern world. All this time we’ve been abused and mistreated, had our data collected and income extracted in so many scammy ways ….. and now we have a word that fits it so perfectly

[–] TotalFat@lemmy.world 15 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

'Should of" instead of "should've"

[–] LowtierComputer@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Oh God that's got to be the worst one.

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

The exception that proves the rule.

People use it in a way where counterexample proofs that the rule exist when it's supposed to mean that the rule also handles exceptional cases.

[–] 418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 hours ago (4 children)
[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 1 points 3 hours ago

Oh yeah absolutely. I'm a programmer and I see so many companies and recruiters etc use Cyber instead of Cybersecurity. It drives me absolutely mad, but these type of people drive me mad anyways. It's probably the same crowd who ruined AI by overhyping it into its grave, the same crowd who were hyped by web 3.0 and the whole Blockchain craze, and probably all those other dumb crazes before it.

Still, this cyber thing seems to permeate everything, and I've heard people using the term who I otherwise respect. For me it's a quick way to instantly become very sceptical of whatever follows the term

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TotalFat@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Pronouncing realtor like "real-uhh-torrrrr"

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 7 points 11 hours ago

The replacement of the term “conspiracy theory” with just “conspiracy”.

That’s two different things. If we equate the two semantically we can’t discuss them.

load more comments
view more: next ›