this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
605 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19097 readers
5785 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This is just from taylor swift's specific link and does not include any other traffic to vote.gov

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 199 points 1 month ago (3 children)

They have woken the Swifties.

May god have mercy apon their ragged souls.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 month ago

Now let’s recruit the K-Pop stans and only then will our victory be truly complete. We must unite these 2 forces for good.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago (8 children)

May god have mercy on their souls

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago

It was only a matter of time until Donald incurred the wrath of TayTay

[–] comador@lemmy.world 129 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But but JD Vance said no one would be influenced by her!

[–] Someonelemmy@lemmynsfw.com 62 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Even more ironic, he said no one would be swayed by an out of touch billionaire that can't identify with them...

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

Really? Holy crap. If course, Trump is NOT a billionaire. Pretty sure that's why he has never released his tax returns. He embarrassed at how little money he has, compared to what he claims.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Technically he said a “billionaire celebrity,” so he might have been referring to his boss.

[–] comador@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Taylor Swift Net worth: 1.3 billion USD

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago

And hers isn't made up based off of Russian money laundering.

A reminder that all Trump businesses have failed and he's literally bankrupted a casino five separate times (and a hotel once). One of his spawn has also stated that the family has been "debanked" or fired as clients (due to financial, legal, regulatory, or reputational risk). Ironic that debanking usually comes under scrutiny for how it has disproportionately targeted Muslims and minorities.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Correct. We know that. It’s a dig on the hypocrisy of what Vance said. Vance said a celebrity billionaire wouldn’t have influence, and his running mate is exactly that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 91 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Someone is going to get "Swift Voted"

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 month ago

That's excellent. Thank you.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 45 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How many are from the esteemed nation of PAWANEVMIAZGANC?

[–] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'd guess a few. Swift's background in country means she's got a big fanbase in GA and NC. Even bigger than the other states, I mean.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

That's an encouraging sign.

Even a 1% boost in turn out from young people could mean a lot in many races across the country, in swing state country I mentioned or not. Most people aren't Swifties, but chances are young people would have at least a friend of a friend who is one who may motivate the people around them to get involved this election.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago

quite a swift response

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (2 children)

According to Taylor Swift's post, Trump and his propagandists posting fake pictures of Swift implying she was endorsing him is one reason she went ahead and came out with this statement endorsing Harris now, to refute the fake stuff they are circulating. So their stupid plan massively backfired.

Maybe Swift would have come out to endorse Harris at some point anyway, but doing it now gives people more time to get registered before the deadline.

[–] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah they pretty much forced her to engage. All because this F.. former president thought he could materialize an endorsement by posting a deepfaked image saying she endorsed him.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Interesting to see extreme narcissism combined with the ability to generate any picture imaginable. It's like he made the ai picture, and then believed it was true because his ego would not allow otherwise. He's literally trying to create his own reality.

Fascinating.

[–] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Don’t forget the part where he played the victim as well. His ego also wouldn’t allow him to take blame for spreading blatant lies. So when he got called out, all of a sudden he knew nothing about this picture. Someone “just sent” it to him and he thought it was real. Obviously a guy who wants to be the fucking president shouldn’t need to demonstrate that he’s capable of critical thinking or fact checking… ~/s~

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

I'm sure their "concepts of a plan" had it really all thought out

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I know there is work to be done every single day through the election. But just for this moment I'm going to just breathe it all in and enjoy. I think we all earned that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm just impressed that this wasn't clickbait and that they took the time to filter for her link only. No way to refute it.

Now, if they will actually go vote, is the key.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

Different kind of swiftboat in play this election.

[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Why is there a referral link to vote.gov? And why do you guys need to register in order to vote? In EU you can just go to the voting ballot by being a citizen

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

In the US there is no "national ID" everything is linked to like other countries. We used to be strongly privacy minded as a country (weird I know). So that as left some rather weird legacy problems. Hence having the register to vote.

Also we have a much different power dynamic between states and the federal government. Our states have a LOT more power than local/regional ones in most counties.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm reality, it's mostly absolute chaos. People unwittingly break so many laws everytime they cross a state border. Between helmet laws, small motor, open container, vastly different fire arm regulations, differing vehicular restrictions, legality or illegality of common substances.

That's not even to mention all the interstate stuff managed by the fed. Like traveling accross state lines with a pill organizer is illegal.

[–] sparky1337@ttrpg.network 4 points 1 month ago

I will at least point out, that unless it’s a safety or moving violation you can’t get something like a window tint ticket in Virginia if your car is registered in North Carolina because the window tint laws are different.

Also, in rare cases, if the vehicle comes from the factory with super dark tint, you can’t get a ticket period because it is federally allowed. See the GM Pontiac fiero rear limo tint from the 80’s.

And this is just one aspect of a vehicle across state lines. So yea, it’s chaos and the police will give you a ticket anyways, especially if you’re a visitor.

[–] gedhrel@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

The way the electoral roll is managed varies from place to place.

Avoiding automatic voter registration tends to favour the more traditionally conservative demographic; it's racist and classist, but the people who turn up to vote on local electoral issues are too, by and large. It requires engagement to change.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

[Promotes basic action of American democracy]

"They are cheating!!! That's not fair!!!!"

[–] RippleEffect@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

They should stick to sports, erhm, music, and stay out of politics!

/s if not obvious

[–] kofe@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

"If you listen to her, you're stupid and shouldn't vote" is my favorite emotionally abusive narrative.

Fuck these creeps. To anyone that felt inspired by Swift, you deserve to feel empowered.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

All I can say is: lololol

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

That's significant.
Trump lost in 2020 by 11,780 votes.
That's what he needed to take Georgia and their EC votes.
Taylor just got 30x that number of people to register in a single day.

[–] BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It seems like a bad idea to track where traffic is coming from when a person is signing up to vote. We know the sort of opponent in this endeavor, why give them the ability to start determining who might have papers or information get accidentally lost in the application process?

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

Vote.gov is aware of the traffic. It redirects you to your state website to actually register. Those websites would only see traffic from vote.gov, not anything from a tracking URL.

Vote.gov uses custom links to see what is effective in getting people to register to vote so they can continue doing that, as that's their mandate.

As a note, this is 10x as many people signing up same day then in 2022 when she directed people to vote.org

Yep, just now realizing my mistake. Thanks, I’ll edit!

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The article itself says:

The same day Taylor Swift posted a message encouraging her followers to register to vote, over 35,000 people reportedly made a “Run (Taylor’s Version)” to do so on Vote.org

Edit: I had clicked the wrong link. OP’s headline is thankfully correct!

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That was 2022, when she used the vote.org link, which is a charity that registers people to vote. Yesterday, she used vote.gov, which is a government service that redirects people to their local state registration services.

OPs headline is the same as the article from this year, and is accurate as it lists referrals, which is what vote.gov does.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago

The election is being run by non-fascists. If we want to keep it that way, we need to vote.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] moon@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago

They will learn no lessons from this because they're stuck in their weirdo right-wing media/online bubble. They'll keep saying weird and disgusting things like Musk when he threatened to impregnate Taylor Swift, and it will be devastating for them

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

"...but my lord, there is no such force!"

load more comments
view more: next ›