Someonelemmy

joined 1 year ago
[–] Someonelemmy@lemmynsfw.com 33 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Drugs are great, too!

[–] Someonelemmy@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 3 weeks ago

His supporters don't see these clips or read the transcript. Fox, OANN, etc, never show his disasters.

[–] Someonelemmy@lemmynsfw.com 62 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Even more ironic, he said no one would be swayed by an out of touch billionaire that can't identify with them...

[–] Someonelemmy@lemmynsfw.com 16 points 4 months ago

Apparently its the other way around. This tech is old: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/jul/19/robots-research

News to me. I loved the game andI really thought the plot was original.

[–] Someonelemmy@lemmynsfw.com 88 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Well now I just D.A.R.E. the cops to stay off drugs. Just say "no", you hypocritical bastards

[–] Someonelemmy@lemmynsfw.com 19 points 6 months ago

That's encouraging. Just when I thought nothing would come of the protests. Now to see if the vote actually pass a motion to divest.

[–] Someonelemmy@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 7 months ago

Ahhh, I'm just a warm, toasty cinnamon bun...

[–] Someonelemmy@lemmynsfw.com 27 points 7 months ago

"The package is also running headlong into the schedule in the Senate, which is expected to begin the impeachment trial of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas on April 11."

OMFG... The priorities.

[–] Someonelemmy@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 8 months ago

Ok. So, replace him with who?

[–] Someonelemmy@lemmynsfw.com 18 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] Someonelemmy@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Hillary couldn't win using the "Trump is dangerous" platform, but she's absolutely been proven right. The question now is, do enough people care about something as existential as the end of democracy, or are they too focused on inflation and gas prices.

[–] Someonelemmy@lemmynsfw.com 84 points 9 months ago (51 children)

The court cases striking down these shitty laws really need to get moving. Restricting access to hormone therapy is blatantly unconstitutional, as the existing challenges that have made it through the courts have proved.

People born XXY (Klinefelter's Syndrome) can get testosterone for treatment, so to say someone who needs testosterone for similar gender affirming care cannot get it is plain discrimination on the basis of gender and sexual orientation.

view more: next ›