Oh, was this why DuckDuckGo was down yesterday?
this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
218 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37699 readers
313 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah. It was pretty funny to me because downdetector.com (run by the speedtest.net folks) had 4 times the error reports submitted for DDG than Bing. Bing has a bigger market share, so I think it's purely down to DDG users being more technically-minded.
I always thought that people using searx etc over duckduckgo were just gluttons for punishment. Having gone an entire morning without search, maybe now is the time to dive down that rabbit hole...
Seems like most search engines these days are primarily Google-based or Bing-based. Mojeek has its own crawler, I think...
Alexandria and Stract use their own open source crawlers. Brave is also independent, if I recall correctly.
Brave does have an option to use anonymous Google results as a fallback if their index doesn't return enough results, but it will ask you before it does it.
This is correct, we are independent and have been since all the way back in 2004, 8bn-page index and growing 😀
I just read your profile and can't believe you guys have been on lemmy for 3 years. What made you guys join before lemmy got popular?
people interested in alternative search tend to be in spaces that aren't your GAFAM big tech networks, we've been on masto since 2018 also
not to come off as overly dismissive of people elsewhere, but you also find that the quality of discourse and people's willingness to think about things are both considerably more elevated
🙂👍
Nice! Mojeek looks great. Thanks for the tip!
Kagi.com has its own I believe. But you have to pay a subscription to use it.
My understanding is that Kagi relies on the likes of Bing and Google but since it uses more than one of them it can keep functioning if one goes down.
TIL. I thought they had their own crawler. I’m a little disappointed.
They do both, their own index focuses on the "small web", more info here:
https://help.kagi.com/kagi/search-details/search-sources.html
I'm one of those guys. Searx itself is just a meta search engine, using Google and many other search engines. You don't need to dive into any rabbit hole, just use a pre existing server for easy access. From time to time I switch the instance. You can then still decide if you want go the full rabbit hole and host it yourself, but that is not a requirement. At least its fully open source and your data/search queries are not sent to Google or Microsoft. In the settings can be specified which engines you want to use:
Try it out here: https://searx.space/ and for some information about SearxNG: https://docs.searxng.org/
Wait, it supports bangs? That's the #1 thing that keeps me specifically with DDG, once i have some time i'll have to explore this (probably not earlier than a couple weeks though)
I was used to the bangs in DuckDuckGo too, but stopped using them. In example I have duckduckgo search engine disabled here, but can still do a ddg only search with !ddg hello . But don't get your hopes too high, because I think it only supports the few bangs and nothing else. It does not support ddg bangs. I registered a DuckDuckGo bang !retro to point to RetroPie forum, but it does not work in Searx.
Edit: It would have been a true banger if we could combine them in Searx like this: !ddg!retro
That combination works in Brave to search the forum (prefixing !ddg or !d) I’m surprised it doesn’t in Searx.
I've just tested this in Brave and it works. And it does not require the combination, !retro on its own is enough. Nice!
Alternative you may consider is the brave search. Supports many bangs (?all of what ddg supports). It is independent of other search engines as well. But its picture search is poor.
Thank you.
I've switched to this from DuckDuckGo right during the downtime and, so far, it's been working out great.
Doesn't searx just aggregate google and bing for you?
You can turn off Google if you want and use whatever engines you like.
Literally did this this morning and now searx is the default search engine on all my devices. Works great so far
I'm using Kagi and can't be happier.
I too use Kagi but it's worth noting that Kagi gets most of its results by paying and using other search engines including Google and Bing, so it's not 100% independent or immune from say Bing's outage. Still the best option by far though.
It could become independent with sufficient funding. I think that's part of the idea.
Though, being able to use other indexes is likely still helpful.
$10 a month happy? Not being an ass, just really asking.... I thought it was steep when I checked it out the first time
As someone also using Kagi:
-
There's a free tier, so you can try it out as much as you want (technically you only get 100 searches, but as with all free trials you can just make a new account)
-
There's a cheaper tier at $5 now, which gets you 300 searches per month. Depending on how much you use it, that might just be enough.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I feel like this article took a quick turn from "Bing went down" to "Google bad".
I am glad more people realize who's actually behind DDG and such.
DDG and others don't really hide the fact that the results come from Bing. People really underestimate how hard it is to make a search engine.
I haven't opened the article yet, but are you complaining that the article talks about what's in the headline?
i'm not sure that i agree with this at all. Microsoft, itself, has been having issues lately, and i don't think this is a Bing vs Google search thing. But i believe those issues are temporary.
Overall, the direction that Google is taking with its search engine is probably a bigger threat to Google, considering, i suspect, people really aren't going to like it.
Problem is that regular Google results are also getting worse. Google has to change something about search, and they're most worried about chatgpt being a better alternative to Google search.
Google search needs to just branch itself off into several micro-search engines. It is useless as a general purpose search engine.
Again, try searching 'skillet' and you'll get more results on the band with the name than the pan itself. Make a media-based micro search engine where it's nothing but music, movies, shows .etc
But as big as Google is, they won't do it.
Pretty much. Is there an alternative?
I'd go for a SearXNG instance, since its a meta search engine, its gonna work unless all other search engines shut down.
Also nice benefit of being FOSS and of no charge.
I have been using Metager more and more lately. Most of the time, it seems that the results are better than or least as good as DDG and Google.
Metager uses Yahoo and Yandex in the free version, when you pay you can also get search results from bring, mojeek and brave, but you can select which search engines you want to use in the settings.
While we're on the topic of search engines, does anyone know how to install your own private Whoogle instance? I've been a little confused by the instructions I've found; do I need my own server to set this up?
If you just want to use it from your home computer / network you can run it locally, either installing it directly or in a container. You only need a server (or a way to connect to your home network) if you want to access it from elsewhere.
Thanks! Will give it a try (but may have more questions as I try to set it up).
I use startpage as my primary search engine. It's also privacy based and has an A rating from TermsofService;Didn't Read.
view more: next ›