this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
856 points (99.4% liked)

Antiwork

494 readers
1 users here now

For the abolition of work. Yes really, abolish work! Not "reform work" but the destruction of work as a separate field of human activity.

To save the world, we're going to have to stop working! — David Graeber

A strange delusion possesses the working classes of the nations where capitalist civilization holds its sway. ...the love of work... Instead of opposing this mental aberration, the priests, the economists, and the moralists have cast a sacred halo over work. — Paul Lafargue

In communist society, where nobody has one exclusive sphere of activity but each can become accomplished in any branch he wishes, society regulates the general production and thus makes it possible for me to do one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticise after dinner, just as I have a mind, without ever becoming hunter, fisherman, herdsman or critic. — Karl Marx

In the glorification of 'work', in the unwearied talk of the 'blessing of work', I see the same covert idea as in the praise of useful impersonal actions: that of fear of everything individual. — Friedrich Nietzsche

If hard work were such a wonderful thing, surely the rich would have kept it all to themselves. — Lane Kirkland

The bottom line is simple: all of us deserve to make the most of our potential as we see fit, to be the masters of our own destinies. Being forced to sell these things away to survive is tragic and humiliating. We don’t have to live like this. ― CrimethInc

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 142 points 8 months ago (3 children)

You know what sucks? For all the employees there, including HR, they would definitely sympathize with the person pulling this.

The people at the top however? CEOs and whatnot? They wouldn't fucking care. I don't even think they would have an ounce of sympathy.

That's the reality.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 124 points 8 months ago (1 children)

HR is much more closely aligned with the CEO than the employees

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 78 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Correct. They are there to manage the company's human resources. They're not there to help us. It's in the name of their title. The company perceives people as nothing but another resource to exploit.

[–] bjorney@lemmy.ca 23 points 8 months ago (4 children)

You are implying people choose to work in HR because they are heartless corporate bootlickers who like crushing people's lives, and not because, idk, it's a job they get paid to do

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

That's not what I'm implying. Lots of us have to do stuff for our paychecks that we wouldn't do otherwise. HR people seem to be pretty cool to me. HR departments and policies are not there to help you, they're there to protect the company's resources.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They might but they probably won't wouldn't even be aware

[–] trebuchet@lemmy.ml 9 points 8 months ago

Exactly. Humans are funny, irrational beings. We feel these things like sympathy super strongly when we see another person suffering.

Without the direct sight though, we don't feel it.

So maybe the CEO would if he was there, but chances are he isn't so he doesn't.

It's a big part about why it's not what you know but who you know that's so important in life.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I wonder why it's like that? After all they're the same raw material - human.

It must be because upper management is culled, is screened, for selecting heartlessness and ruthlessness, and the lack of sympathy.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

They hire people who only care about big number go up

[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 99 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Well technically the worst (but absolutely legal) thing you can do, from their perspective is to be very well versed in your rights for the state or province you're in. Is it a dismissal without cause? Then what severance are they offering? Did your negotiate it? Basically they'll want you to sign something and promise not to sue - in exchange to signing this they'll offer something. Negotiate that... Usually in the form of X weeks of pay per years of service at your employer, but X can vary and be negotiated. You can also negotiate a referral letter from your boss even though companies usually say "we don't make referral letters" - as part of my package negotiation you will...

I hope it helps!!

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 8 months ago (11 children)

What happens when they refuse to negotiate? Do you then sue?

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 24 points 8 months ago

My guess is that this technique works better with a small company


trying to get cute with a multinational with the legal budget of a small nation (and ironclad contracts + knowledge of local regulations) might not work well.

[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 months ago

You might - refusing to sign, sending a well written formal notice, articulating a good demand with a rationale. It could be that based on your skills, the economy, opportunities in your field, etc that their standard severance won't "make you whole", i.e. allow you to find replacement employment that pays the same in a reasonable timeframe.

Ultimately a judge might rule that you had a reasonable expectation of financial stability from your employer, and by laying you off they're taking that away. The severance is there to bridge that expectation, so if you can demonstrate that their offered severance package is really far, you have a case.

Now the employer knows that - so if you prepare properly and ask/negotiate you have a shot!

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Knives at dawn

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Mfw I work in an "at will" employment state.

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 65 points 8 months ago (5 children)

That's funny and all, but the real answer is call in sick to fuck with them, provided it's the kind of job with sick time/vacation time.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 38 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

provided it's the kind of job with sick time/vacation time.

And even if it isn't, what're they gonna do? Double-fire you?

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 8 months ago

Hah well no, but they also won't pay that last day. If you use PTO they have to pay you and might not even fire you that day because of HR rules about needing to be in person/with witnesses etc

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Well, you'd lose your last day of paid employment, which is a big deal to most people with jobs that don't have paid time off.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Oh. Yeah, that's a good point. Guess I need to check my "living in a country with humane labor laws" privilege lol

[–] Kiosade@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I assume they would use PTO for that day. But then I guess that means your PTO payout will be smaller, so still a net loss.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 8 months ago

Not everywhere has guaranteed PTO payouts, so burn that shit while you can and use the time to get a new job.

Theres also the bullshit of "unlimited time off" where there's not a definitive payout in places that DO guarantee PTO payout.

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 8 months ago

This is the best answer in the thread. Use all the sick time you have left before they fire you.

[–] shutz@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 months ago

Funny story: I was on vacation when a previous job ended in layoffs, which happened on a Friday. On Sunday night I got an IM from a coworker letting me know about the layoffs, but I still went into work on Monday, feigning ignorance. Here, if you show up for work but they have no more work for you, they still have to pay you for a minimum of 3 hours. Anyway, unemployment Insurance is a federal thing, here. They still delayed the 2 weeks of pay they would normally have to pay it by calling it a temporary layoff, though they paid it 6 months later when temporary became permanent.

Years later at a different job, I was home, sick from food poisoning when layoffs happened. Came into work the next day only to be invited by the HR person into a meeting room where they explained what had happened. I still had a small assignment I'd promised to a VP, so I asked if I could just finalize it and send it off. They let me and I did it (took maybe 30 minutes) and then I left. About 4 years later, when I was looking for work, that VP remembered me, and that contributed to being rehired there in a new position, and I've been with that same employer now for the past 12 years (that VP has since left.) Best place I ever worked at, both times.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 8 months ago

And then come back in like a month or just mess with them. Pretend you don't know about the firing.

[–] GlitterInfection@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

You can be laid off while not in the office or out on paid leave.

In many places paid time off is counted as compensation, which means they have to pay it to you if they let you go or fire you. So check that first as well.

[–] calzone_gigante@lemmy.eco.br 50 points 8 months ago

Take a couple sick days and spread a rumor that the boss is gonna fire his lover because he/she also fucked his partner.

[–] HaywardT@lemmy.sdf.org 41 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I was torn up because I had to fire a switchboard operator who just couldn't make it in on time. It's one of those jobs where you have to be there when the business says it's open. She got some warnings and then within a week she was late again. I had to fire her. During the termination meeting she said "This is harder for you than it is for me."

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Was she trying to get fired?

[–] HaywardT@lemmy.sdf.org 30 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Not really. But she didn't care much. She knew what the rest of us learned from COVID. Your life doesn't depend on your job. Shortly after this event she went to Africa.

[–] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 16 points 8 months ago

Her life didn't depend on anything within a thousand miles of that job apparently

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago
[–] SapienSRC@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago

They’ll most likely just grab a cupcake, shake your hand for the twins announcement, then let you go five minutes before quiting time.

[–] trebuchet@lemmy.ml 25 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Saying something implicating a protected class like "I'm pregnant" might provoke some panicked calls to HR and actually get you off that list.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 24 points 8 months ago (1 children)

As a boring white dude... I think I'm gay? And also trans and pregnant?

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

"I just entered a rehab program for my drug addiction." According to King of the Hill, that creates a fire-proof shield if the company is bigger than x people.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I know a guy who got fired a month after coming back from parental leave for twins.

HR doesn't care if they've got some documented reason, which is they've already scheduled to firing you, they do.

[–] trebuchet@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago

A man coming back from parental leave doesn't sound like a protected class to me, unlike being a pregnant woman who is protected by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act in the United States.

Also, I'm not saying it's a surefire guarantee. The important part is you don't have to be the fastest runner when the wolf is hungry, you just have to run faster than the guy next to you.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think I would try to not waste any more energy on the place. But reality is I would waste energy being emotional about it for a while. Honestly there isn't shit you can do as revenge that will make up for it. Other than maybe getting a much better job.

[–] cricketyrickets@midwest.social 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I heard ‘revenge is a lazy way to grieve’ recently and it’s really stuck with me. Your comment reminded me of that.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Now it will stick with me. That's a pretty brilliant quote.

[–] invisiblegorilla@sh.itjust.works 13 points 8 months ago

At least in 'parts - if not all' of EU, if you quit you get fuck all.. Get sacked and you can claim unemployment...

Getting laid off pays out. Quitting only allows the employer to pay you fuck all, and let's face it... Most will if they can save on their margins.

[–] THE_ANTIHERO@lemmy.today 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Inviting them all to a party and making a toast about how gratefull you are for working there and telling each co worker how much you love them is the only logical thing to do .

[–] hawgietonight@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

First, decide if you want to burn the bridge and if doing something weird could be betraying the colleague that gave you the information.

Then, being somewhat creative I think you could craft a fake resingment letter and show it to key workers but don't sign it. Let them spill the beans. Depending on your contract it could mean big savings for the employer and it could mess up their strategy.

In any case, make sure to resolve any pending issues and get ready for the news.

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 months ago
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I found out the day of a mass layoff and scheduled a surgery I needed for that morning. They are prohibited from laying you off on medical leave where i live.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Make uncomfortably continuous eye contact during the entire conversation. Make sure to minimize their personal space and smile unsettling too.

load more comments
view more: next ›