this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
100 points (98.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26549 readers
1832 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Let hear them conjects

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

The reason my memory seems to be fuzzy at times, even for some things that happened recently, comes down to the fact that I was put under for surgery back in 2011 and was under for longer than they expected due to finding something they didn't expect.

[–] JayleneSlide@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago

My BS, unprovable hypothesis: The Golden Age of Piracy was actually a successful Socialist movement, with Nassau being a disruptively successful enclave of Socialism in action. The pirates deeply threatened the budding power structures in the US (not conjecture) and the entrenched powers in Europe. While some powers, most notably royalty, were willing to use pirates as mercenaries (privateers), there was an excess of democracy and human concern (somewhat my conjecture) among the Nassau pirates. The Nassau pirates had pensions, a form of worker's comp, disability, democratic command structures at sea, and healthcare (such as it was given the era). According to the historical texts on the Nassau pirates, there were almost no written records, which strikes me as especially odd since they had so many long-running financial and governing processes.

[–] Okami_No_Rei@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

"Sometimes the things that may or may not be true are the things a man needs to believe in the most.

That people are basically good; that honor, courage, and virtue mean everything; that power and money, money and power mean nothing; that good always triumphs over evil; and I want you to remember this, that love... true love never dies.

You remember that, boy. You remember that. Doesn't matter if it's true or not.

You see, a man should believe in those things, because those are the things worth believing in."

  • Hub, Secondhand Lions (2003)
[–] cmoney@lemmy.world 49 points 6 days ago (18 children)

I believe that life as we know it exists somewhere else in the universe .

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 26 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (5 children)

Tied to this, I believe there is no intelligent life close enough to ever reach us physically (short of freezing themselves and traveling millions of years, but we really aren't worth that trip lol) I don't believe faster than light travel will ever exist.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Gobbel2000@programming.dev 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 36 points 6 days ago (7 children)

When I started working decades ago, we were taught how to use bent bits of fence wire to find underground pipes before digging

I literally found scores of pipes that way, and saw dozens of other people do it regularly. It was even taught at a local agricultural college as part of the horticulture course

Then someone told me it was a myth and doesn't work, so I set up a blind test with a hidden bucket of water and I utterly failed to find it

I simply cannot explain this

[–] evroid@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's called Dowsing

Dowsing is a type of divination employed in attempts to locate ground water, buried metals or ores, gemstones, oil, claimed radiations (radiesthesia), gravesites, malign "earth vibrations" and many other objects and materials without the use of a scientific apparatus.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago

I was taught this too growing up in rural america. Did it myself at some land my grandparents had.

Best explanation I've heard for why it "works" is that when looking for places to first install pipes the location tends to be obvious or intuitive, so then years later when someone needs to find it again we naturally trend to the same rough area, pull out those stupid rod things and when they randomly cross there's a pipe there cause we're already standing in the general right spot. Get a high enough success rate and our brains start to think there is causation to the correlation.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] randomdeadguy@lemmy.world 32 points 6 days ago (18 children)
[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)

We are social animals that evolved to work cooperatively. We have deeply ingrained mechanisms that encourage pro-social behavior.

I agree. People are by default "good" and want happy lives within their communities. It's when tribalism steps into the scenario that most problems arise.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 days ago

Thing is, that tribalism is what drives the good parts.

It falls apart with distance or numbers, though.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The Pizzagate conspiracy was created to cover up any media coverage of the police reports from the early 90s when Trump was hanging with Epstein and dumping 'used' underage girls at a pizza parlor the next morning.

[–] Denjin@lemmings.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The Piazzagate conspiracy theory was created by bored 4channers to see how ridiculous a story they can invent and how many people will just believe it. I don't think anyone realised it would get as big as it did and then they did it again with Q.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Was it really a bunch of bored nerds, or did a PR agent make an anonymous post to start the rumor mill?

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

We likely live in a simulation.

Assuming it's possible to create a simulation, the odds of us being in a simulation is 50%

But if you can create one simulation, maybe you can create 1 million. Or maybe you can create nested simulations.

So even if the chance of creating a simulation is 1%, but the creation of one simulation means millions are created, the odds of us living in a simulation are above 99.99%.

Another theory is the Boltzmann Brain. Basically the idea that a brain can spontaneously appear in space:

By one calculation, a Boltzmann brain would appear as a quantum fluctuation in the vacuum after a time interval of 10^10^50 years.

Which means if the universe lasts forever, but has already reached a point where worlds can't form, there's infinite time for something as complex as a brain to suddenly spawn. Which also means it's more likely that you don't exist and are just a brain that will last for a nanosecond before disappearing, and none of this is real. In fact, in a universe that lasts forever, the fact you are a brain that will disappear in a nanosecond is more likely than you being a human with a real past.

[–] TinyShonk@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's been a looooong nanosecond.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago

That's what you think!

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Most of my moral convictions aren't provable because the most basic ideas are simply axioms. "You should be a good person" cannot be justified in a way that's non-circular, and defining "good" is also similarly arbitrary. The only true "evidence" is that people tend to agree on vague definitions in theory. Which is certainly a good thing, imo, but it's not actually provable that what we consider "good" is actually the correct way to act.

I have started creating a moral framework, though. I've been identifying and classifying particular behaviors and organizing them in a hierarchy. So far it's going pretty well. At least my arbitrariness can be well-defined!

[–] Lux18@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

You should watch The Good Place and/or read the book How to be Perfect by Michael Schur. He made the show too.

He starts from the same standpoint as you and then explores moral philosophy to find answers.

[–] okamiueru@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

I think it is easy enough to argue without making it circular. As for "good", I don't think an objective absolute and universal definition is necessary.

The argument would be to consider it an optimization problem, and the interesting part, what the fitness function is. If we want to maximise happiness and freedom, any pair of people is transient. If it matters that they be kind to you, it is the exact same reasoning for why you should be to kind to them. Kinda like the "do unto others", except less prone to a masochist going around hurting people.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 20 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I believe that the reason why so many people are going crazy in America at least is because they are approaching the end of their life and they have been told the whole time they've been alive that they would be living through the end of times, and if it becomes true then their lives have not been wasted but if it is not true or if it doesn't happen until after they die then their lives have been wasted and it's driving them crazy.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"Christianity is a death cult," essentially. Why bother to make it better here when paradise is guaranteed?

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 11 points 6 days ago

I heard "the moment you start praying is the moment you've given up trying" the other night. I almost spat my tea.

[–] Pyflixia@kbin.melroy.org 10 points 5 days ago

When we die, we're recycled. There's no Heaven, Hell, Rainbow Bridge, Valhalla .etc Because those are man-made constructs to give people a sense of belonging based on what you did in life. Someone talked to me about the Egg Theory and while I have a bit of skepticism towards it, I do understand a plausibility about it.

And if anything from the Egg Theory is true, then cool, I'd love nothing more than to be recycled and born into a life from the past to live it out again.

[–] kalkulat@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Either greed or religion has killed the most people before their time. One of them has to go.

[–] coaxil@lemm.ee 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OutOfMemory@sh.itjust.works 17 points 6 days ago (11 children)

That global democratic socialism can work. Currently the only states successful in implementing it are oil-rich nordic countries, and I want to believe it can work elsewhere but it'll be hard to prove.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 9 points 5 days ago

No, Norway is social democracy.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

I think the problem is that no system that gives equal weight to everyone's opinions can survive a population that does not have a majority of good opinions. And if the populace does agree on most things, then it doesn't matter much what system is being used. The best the system can do is incentivise certain behaviors.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] zxqwas@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That I'd be a fool to strongly hold a belief without equally strong evidence.

[–] faultypidgeon@programming.dev 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Did this man just call himself a fool?

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Everyones a fool and knows nothing :)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rsuri@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That consciousness is real and not an illusion

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 4 days ago

Even though I feel like I might ignite, I probably won't.

[–] Akareth@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

That humans are apex predators, and we have been so for upwards of 2.5 million years. Following from this, I believe that most chronic illnesses that we have today (e.g. obesity, diabetes, mental illnesses, cardiovascular diseases, arthritis, PCOS, etc.) are caused by us straying from eating diets with lots of fatty meat.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 9 points 6 days ago (11 children)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

I've mentioned them before and they're semi-related, in a broad sense:

I believe the Congressional baseball game shooting was likely intended to benefit Trump.

I believe it's likely that the Russian government has knowingly promoted interracial cuck porn, in some capacity.

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Inductive reasoning. I don't have any non-circular reason to believe that previous experience should predict future events. But I'm gonna believe it anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›