this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
615 points (99.2% liked)

News

22903 readers
4501 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ynazuma@lemmy.world 128 points 4 months ago (2 children)

France, doing the right thing

Producers always tout and advertise when they put more into the package, but fail to let us know when they reduce the contents

This is common sense

[–] HejMedDig@feddit.dk 54 points 4 months ago

We recently had a local candy brand advertise that the packaging has gotten smaller, but still contained the same amount. So I guess that they over time had removed enough pieces, that the box started to look suspiciously empty, and they then shrank the box to make it look fuller

[–] argh_another_username@lemmy.ca 27 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Brazil did this years ago. We see in the package “new weight, from X to Y, reduction of N%”. And nothing actually came out of it. Everyone does, we have to buy it, shit stays the same.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You don’t have to buy it though! None of the packaged products in a grocery store are necessities. You could live a very healthy lifestyle eating only the fresh stuff from the store!

[–] metaStatic@kbin.social 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

it is my contention that you could eat any random items form the perimeter of the store and be healthier than anyone that buys items from the health food aisle.

Food is an ingredient, it shouldn't have ingredients

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is a plate of spaghetti and meatballs not food?

[–] metaStatic@kbin.social 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

did it come out of a box pre-made?

[–] HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Being mega pedantic, pasta has ingredients.

But I understand your general point, you should be able to read the list of ingredients and understand what they all are right? Pasta being, flour, eggs, olive oil and salt is a much shorter list than whatever is in a microwave meal

[–] Akrenion@programming.dev 3 points 4 months ago

Once you start googling some ingredients it is very easy to see what things are for. People are surprised when you tell them chicken flavour is vegan. I still don't think that is a bad thing.

Just cramming in 5 types of sugar and the daily recommended dosis of salt. That is what frustrates me. Maybe a list of purposes would help.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.social 2 points 4 months ago (4 children)

pretty much.

it's an oversimplification that works well enough. don't get me started on flour though ...

(I'm of the opinion that if it didn't have parents it isn't food either but that doesn't need to be a conversation)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 40 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

The US needs nationally mandated unit price labeling. We’ve had it in NY for as long as I can remember.

You’d be shocked at how often the middle size is the best deal. It’s almost always the case with cereal. The large box ends up more expensive than the medium per ounce, but people assume it’s the better deal because it’s a bigger package.

https://www.nist.gov/pml/owm/laws-and-regulations/us-retail-pricing-laws-and-regulations#:~:text=Currently%2C%20nineteen%20(19)%20states,Vermont%20and%20the%20Virgin%20Islands.

[–] BastingChemina 15 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Unit price labeling is mandatory in France too. This is the only price I'm looking at when shopping.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I’m sorry. The article is clearly about France, but my comment was America-centric. I edited my comment for clarity.

I’m glad to hear you have unit pricing available in France. I can’t imagine the time people must spend doing the math for comparison shopping in regions without it.

Do you think the shrinkflation stickers will make a difference in educating the average consumer, or be more effective as a shaming tool for manufacturers?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (4 children)

They’re still jerks about it in stores. To keep you from easily comparing products they’ll offer the unit price per oz for one box, then give you the unit price per lb for the other. So they make you do the math, and I’m sure plenty of people just skip that and buy the larger size.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

That’s against regulations if you live in a unit price mandated state. You can report misuse of unit price labeling to your State Director.

According to NIST SP 1181, under Consistency of Units and Measure:

The declaration of the unit price of a particular category of product in all package sizes offered for sale in a retail establishment shall be uniformly and consistently expressed in the same unit of measure. The same unit of measure should be used whether a product category is sold in a fixed weight pre-pack, loose from bulk, or in a random weight pack.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Looks like I’ve got some reporting to do.

[–] dan@upvote.au 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Costco do this too, at least in my area in California. They price some canned drinks per fluid ounce, and others per can. Really annoying.

I used to see Walmart do it too, but I think they've gotten better.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Bigger cornflake per feedom-eagle.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BlueLineBae@midwest.social 36 points 4 months ago

While I think this is a step in the right direction, I don't think it's fair to put this on the grocers that didn't do anything wrong. This should be a labeling requirement for the manufacturer that's doing it. So instead of the one doing the harm having to take the brunt of the cost for doing it in the first place, instead the grocer has to take the time and money to do it and also keep up with any new changes. Again, step in the right direction. Never let perfect be the enemy of good.

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 24 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I always look at the price/kg. Makes no difference what size the packaging is, that price will always tell which one is the cheapest.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

Package price can still matter depending on how much you need of a product. Buying 10kg of rice when you need 500g is going to be more expensive than buying a smaller bag. Even if the price/kg is higher.

[–] viralJ@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Me too, but there is one UK retailer (Co-operative) that makes it hard for you. They will have, say, a punnet of strawberries with 200g strawberries in it for £3.50 and another one with 300g for £4.50. The labels will say "unit price: £3.50/unit" or "£4.50/unit". (No, really?) So you have to do your own maths. Luckily other markets are sensible enough to actually provide price per weight. And in Tesco, when a given product is cheaper for clubcard holders, it will even give price per weight twice, for both normal price and clubcard price.

Btw. I don't work for Tesco. I just needed to vent about Co-op being dicks; Tesco just serves as a good counter example of how this should be done, in case any Co-op executive is reading this.

[–] Taalen@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

You don't necessarily always check for something you're used to buying, so the shrinking may go unnoticed for a while.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I've been thinking of a solution for this. What if products were required to be sold in standard increments. No 11.2 floz, either 6 floz or 12 floz. No 960 grams, only increments of 250 grams up to 1 kg, then increments of 1 kg. It would make product comparison much easier and make it obvious when shrinkflation is happening.

[–] myliltoehurts@lemm.ee 8 points 4 months ago

I wish you were the one writing the laws, this would be awesome.

[–] Beryl@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's mandatory to display the price per kg or L in France, which makes comparing the value much easier.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 17 points 4 months ago

"This product used to be bigger for the same price."

Dunce hat of the supermarket. Good.

[–] tpihkal@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago (2 children)

NOW WITH 10% LESS PRODUCT!!

[–] errer@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Gotta think more like a corporation: “Now 10% easier to carry!”

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigTrout75@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

We have unit price labeling here in Oregon, but they use different measurements for the same type of is products.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Great time to be label manufacturer

[–] kumatomic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I wish we had consumer protection in the US, but that's unlikely to happen when corporations own most of our politicians.

[–] dan@upvote.au 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I could see this happening in more progressive states like California, Oregon, or Washington state.

California already has a bunch of consumer protection laws:

  • Store gift cards can never expire and must be redeemable for cash if they have a balance of less than $10.
  • A warranty can't require you to register the product to be eligible for warranty coverage.
  • The CCPA, which is like a mini version of the GDPR. Companies must provide all data they've collected about you upon request, must delete all the data upon request, and must let you opt out from them selling your data (they literally have to have a link labeled "do not sell my personal information" on their site)
  • Anti price gouging laws.
  • As of July 1, drip pricing (hidden fees on top of advertised prices, such as service charges) will be illegal.

And probably a bunch of other ones I can't think of off the top of my head :)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] dan@upvote.au 2 points 4 months ago

Honey I shrinked the kids

[–] Addv4@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So, does this apply to products that have already applied shrinkflation, or just those after July 1st?

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Only after. You cannot ignore legal grandfathering or the world would turn upside down.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

So once everyone has done it at least once and every item has a warning that the item changed in size without the price, what do we do?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 3 points 3 months ago

Ah yes, Mars and Twix & co. "It's for your health"

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

Doesn’t Mexico also do this?

load more comments
view more: next ›