To prove that it was actually not a bear damaging the three cars in the video, a biologist from the Department of Fish and Wildlife was brought in to review the footage.
“They also opined it was clearly a human in a bear suit,” the insurance agency said.
When detectives searched the suspects’ homes, they found a bear costume
And nothing gets done because this project exists solely to enrich 2 men
Maybe the headline could be better but it’s a big increase
So we’re just in a forever loop where Dems push forward with a new $20 bill design, then they lose and the next administration kills it? And then Dems win again and the bill needs new security features that take 5 years to plan and this whole thing starts over?
I think the illogical part is how you cited sources that don’t say what you claim they are saying.
This is called “disinformation” folks
Holy misinformation that’s a lot.
Did you read any of these sources or watch the videos? The Starlink (10) claim is BS, as anyone with ears who watched that video can see.
I’m not a mod in this community, so you’re asking the wrong person.
I’m also not sure if you’re confusing me with someone else?
You could say “and?” Or “so what?” To just about any news article you’d like
Do you see this post? Look up.. now click "Create Community"
“Both sides do this!” Is a terrible argument when one side does it 50x more frequently
Remember all those ads about Kamala Harris being soft on crime?
Then remember how Trump won and pardoned a bunch of violent criminals?
“Being born in Mexico doesn’t make you Mexican”
Uh ok?