this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
387 points (99.2% liked)

News

23275 readers
3650 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

New York City’s largest cop union is suing Police Commissioner Edward Caban and Mayor Adams for implementing a new “zero tolerance” policy on NYPD officers using steroids or other performance-enhancing drugs, the Daily News has learned.

In a lawsuit filed in Manhattan Supreme Court on Friday, lawyers for the Police Benevolent Association alleged the previously undisclosed policy flies in the face of a legal agreement the union entered into with the city in 2011.

The 2011 contract prohibited officers from ingesting or possessing any anabolic steroid or other forms of human growth hormones without a medical prescription. However, the old standard didn’t require officers to run any such prescription by their NYPD district surgeon before starting to use it.

The new protocol — which was enacted on Dec. 26, 2023, and described in an internal memo reviewed by The News as a “zero tolerance drug policy” — beefs up the old rule by affirming that officers must “immediately notify their district surgeon” of any steroid prescription they receive and provide “all supporting medical documentation” to the surgeon backing up the need for the drug.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 130 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

As a pilot can’t use many meds so should a cop not use substances with side effects of aggression.

[–] cerement 48 points 6 months ago

NYPD would make the steroids aggressive …

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 128 points 6 months ago

Yeah! Whoever heard of a zero tolerance policy for drug use?

Oh right...

[–] Someonelemmy@lemmynsfw.com 88 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Well now I just D.A.R.E. the cops to stay off drugs. Just say "no", you hypocritical bastards

[–] Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world 34 points 6 months ago

They hate it when the law applies to them, too.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

D.A.R.E.

I only remember 3 things about the D.A.R.E. program growing up:

  1. People will offer you all kinds of drugs for free, and marijuana is suuuuuper bad (bullshit propaganda lol)

  2. No idea what it stands for, other than Drugs Are Really Expensive

  3. Parody shirts like "D.A.R.E. to keep cops off donuts"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TunaCowboy@lemmy.world 81 points 6 months ago (1 children)

On one hand, I can think of good reasons not to disclose HRT or any other personal medical information to your employer, 'district surgeon' or not.

On the other hand, ACAB, get fukt.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

I'm kinda conflicted on this... there's a decent amount of medications that, if your employer knew you were prescribed them, would typically result in being discriminated against or fired. Stimulant meds for ADHD, HRT, chronic pain meds, etc.

If the meds are prescribed for a legitimate need I feel that should remain undisclosed. They aren't the military (even if they should be treated as such), the government doesn't literally own them.

[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 55 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They aren't the military but they do wield lethal force on behalf of the state. It's not a normal employee/employer relationship at all. With that level of responsibility it seems reasonable that maximum transparency should be expected of them.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Absolutely. There should be real disciplinary actions backed with a potential Leavenworth equivalent.

I still think exposing medical history is kinda skeevy, and would absolutely be used in a malicious and discriminatory way.

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Bringing in a valid prescription is all that is ever needed when faced with a positive drug test. In my experience you never have to disclose what it is for. For someone representing the state carrying a fire arm, what drugs you consume should definitely be disclosed

[–] TunaCowboy@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago

Must be terrible to become a victim of institutional oppression.

My heart goes out to all the class traitors that are negatively affected by this systemic injustice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works 43 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Hmmm. The people who are called in to bust unions have the strongest union. There's got to be a lesson here somewhere

[–] Eigerloft@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

Cops aren't workers.

They are management.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 41 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That's cool, cops mad because they want to be able to pump themselves full of illegal drugs known to cause increased aggression and paranoid delusions without facing any consequences. I mean, when has a cop ever faced consequences, so it must be truly mystifying to them that they're being told to ~~stop taking drugs~~ tone down their rampant drug use.

[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 40 points 6 months ago

How dare they try and tell the Tiny Testicle Tazer Team Task Force not to juice anymore!

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 35 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You know what drug would really improve police performance?

Marijuana.

[–] Aolley@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If all cops ate seven grams of magic mushies I think the world would be a much better place for everyone who has to deal with cops

[–] MrVilliam@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

That high of a dose would cause such uncomfortable introspection that very few (if any) cops would want to continue being a cop after that.

So yeah, I guess what I'm saying is that I agree with you. Much better for everybody.

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 26 points 6 months ago

Wait. So the cop mayor finally does one thing right with his out of control police force, and is immediately sued by a bunch of roided up angry cops?

Checks out.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 6 months ago

Their tiny cop brains can't compete with the contradictions. I gotta say, I like seeing conflict between these two parties.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Awww. They all swole up like a bitty baby

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I once was making a left turn in a busy city road. As there was a break in the crowd, I made my turn, and out of the crowd, on the sidewalk, zipping down the opposite direction of the crowd comes a cyclist out on nowhere, and almost smashed into me. Of course the cyclist was at fault for being on the sidewalk and going against traffic, but in a cyclist city, those idiots are always blameless.

Anyways, a roided up cop on a bike chases my car down and punches it, leaving a dent on it. I pull over and he immediately draws his gun and starts shouting at me. He punches my car again and continues raging. Anyways, turns out the cyclist was the one who broke the law so the cop couldn't cite me, so instead he gave me a ticket for an illegal left turn, even though the sign above said it was perfectly fine.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›