Cosmonauticus

joined 1 year ago
[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Thank you for clarifying. Sorry about the misunderstanding

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Depends on if you work or live in Jersey or the surrounding suburbs

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Right off the top of my head. Putin

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

.....oh. OOOHHHH

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The guy is a wildlife photographer. If he asks once and gets ignored he's going to escalate because you then become a nuance to his job. It's like someone coming to your job and overflowing all the toilets or tying up the phones. Obviously it's a reoccurring problem and being nice about it doesn't work.

And again if she just leashed her dog when he asks like she was suppose to be doing in the first place none of this would have happened. You're acting like he threw a rock at her dog

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Yes i rewatched it and read some more articles about it before I commented. Telling her he was going to lure the dog away with treats is the quickest and simpliest way to get her to leash her dog. Dogs running off and fucking with wildlife or ppl is exactly why the official park rule is all dogs must be leashed at all times. He would know considering he's a wildlife photographer. Which is why he confronted her. SHE WAS BREAKING THE RULES OF THE PARK.

The situation basically boiled down to:

"Put your dog on a leash or I'll show why that's the official rule of the park."

Oh my God you're assaulting me!

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (9 children)

How exactly did he screw up? He's a wildlife photographer who told someone to leash their dog because it's a rule that protects wildlife. All of this happened because she flouted the rules and escalated the situation. If she just would've leashed her dog we wouldn't be talking about this. It's 100% on her

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I dunno. Europe, the US, and Canada wreaked havoc across the globe for 400+ years and ppl continue the gloss over it. I'm voting for anyone not Trump but to pretend a facist sociopath from a white majority country never left a trail of destruction in their wake sounds like revisionist history.

None of them ever fixed what happened and now we have Trump. Only difference between then and now is its going to actually affect white ppl.

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Black ppl are just going to be considered in the wrong no matter what we do. We make up a tiny about of drug users yet we're more likely to be arrested for it. Make it make sense

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Yeah but you're leaving out gang rapes. Plus it's impossible to accurately estimate unreported rapes. How often do you see cases of gang rapes in a public setting inside America? No one is saying rapes in America dont happen but to claim India doesn't have a serious problem regarding rape is just disingenuous. And the source I used is coming from a women's rights activist so I'm going to take their word for it instead of a random on the internet.

It's like claiming America doesn't have a gun problem just because intentional shootings in El Salvador or Venezuela happen at a higher rate

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

Ron Howard narrating : it is

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I'm not sure if your innocense should be celebrated or pitied

view more: next ›