This feels more like an anti-atheist meme, since it implies that we might find evidence of God in the future even if we don't have it now. Also implies that visual proof is the only kind of evidence which just isn't the case.
this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
717 points (92.8% liked)
Atheist Memes
5577 readers
11 users here now
About
A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.
Rules
-
No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.
-
No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.
-
No bigotry.
-
Attack ideas not people.
-
Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.
-
No False Reporting
-
NSFW posts must be marked as such.
Resources
International Suicide Hotlines
Non Religious Organizations
Freedom From Religion Foundation
Ex-theist Communities
Other Similar Communities
!religiouscringe@midwest.social
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I disagree. As science goes, we must always remain open-minded, yet, the confirmation of a data point will only reinforce an assertion. An assertion such as, “There, still, is no evidence of the supernatural, such as a god or gods.”
And even if we found “something” we’d have to define it. Perhaps it’s just some very advanced, powerful alien like a Q that appears god-like? That doesn’t make it magic. That just makes it advanced beyond our current understanding, and that’s not the same thing.
I mean I agree but the meme is still dumb.
Fair
load more comments
(9 replies)
I am an atheist and would be fine if we found evidence of literally any kinda god. I am making a determination based on what I have to work with, if I have more to work with I will make a new determination.
You do have to admit, from the theist pov, it is a bit disturbing that everything you can say about God is pretty much what you could say a 100 years ago. Everything we have learned hasn't added to that body of knowledge. Why is that?
You do have to admit, from the theist pov, it is a bit disturbing that everything you can say about God is pretty much what you could say a 100 years ago. Everything we have learned hasn't added to that body of knowledge. Why is that?
And take that logic one step further. How much has been discovered and learned in the last century that was previously attributable to God by theists because we didn't understand it? Doesnt the shrinking list of cosmic unknowns imply a diminish role for a god in our "organized" existence?
The tri-omni has been phoning it in the past century.
Colloquially known as "the god of the gaps". If you put your faith in god's power based on the unknowable, then god's power continually decreases as the unknowable becomes known.
Well, there's Brahma orbiting Pluto right in this picture, what other evidence do you need?
Because God wills it to be that way.
I saw that post about our view of the universe being wrong, how the expansion is a bit different than previously considered. And it got me thinking about the theory of macro and micro being pretty similar to each other. Which led me to the idea of the universe being a creature and us living on the equivalent of a proton or something within a living cell. Then i started wondering what kind of creature we were living in and whether we were a part of it or an infection. And if so, are there any white cells roaming around looking to get rid of us?
Finally, I reached the conclusion that imagination is one helluva drug and i need to get out more to keep in touch with reality.
Now pitch it to netflix
We live in one of the protons that make up the body of a high elf priestess. Do with that knowledge what you wish. I have seen the truth 🧐
So, Horton hears a who?
I dislike this meme because it fails to acknowledge that Christianity (which these posts are often about) has the "you can't test god" rule, so this is entirely expected from a believer's pov.
Except they did not have that rule until they repeatedly failed all their tests.
load more comments
(4 replies)
Weird ass rule.
Test god? Impossible.
Fiddle duel with the devil? Plausible.
Now do dark matter
You want to see a picture of lots of math?
I mean rather explain me exactly what dark mater is?
Because as far as I know they need the matter that we can't see so that the model of our universe first looks like that what we observe and second doesn't fall apart. The same with the dark energy. Our model won't work without invisible matter and energy.
But what does this actually mean?
It means the model is broken.
Well, as a matter of fact, I don't have anything to say but this stupid pun
It's just Nibblonian poop.
wikipedia describes dark matter as a "hypothetical form of matter"
load more comments
(1 replies)
LOL on that Brahma logo placed next to Pluto Now. 🤣
The compulsion to watermark a meme confounds me.
Did you try turning up the Belief?
OLED makes this meme better.
Imagine the world religions if we found a Halo. We'd become the covenant overnight 🙃
Since there has been so little time for DNA to develop to its current complexity, I'm pretty sure that the answer to the Fermi Paradox is that we are early, if not the first species to develop an advanced society.
I can totally see us deciding that we need to scour the galaxy/universe of all other "competition." We'll end up building the Halos and become The Reapers
I need to live long enough to see us build a Halo
view more: next ›