this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
217 points (93.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35673 readers
1665 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It is becoming near impossible to find relevant information from search engines. Duckduckgo, SearXNG, Bing, Google, and so many more mainstream engines have a significantly high noise to signal ratio, and it is getting worse.

Here are a collection of the best search engines I know, please add more to the list.

If no more high quality search engines exist, would it be possible to host your own?

EDIT: Some new discoveries. The addon uBlacklist and filters can block super SEO sites from appearing in search.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sandwichfiend@c0tt0n.world 69 points 9 months ago (7 children)

I find all the kagi mentions to be very suspicious

[–] Z4rK@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

It’s not, really, I switched from Google some years ago and had accepted my faith with DuckDuckGo, but then tried out Kagi. I use search so much daily for work, the relief of getting quality results again is immense and probably saves me hours per week. I get much better results from Kagi than I got at the end from Google, and I can tune them to my liking:

  • block Pinterest results when I search for images,
  • downprioritize shopping results,
  • rewrite all Reddit links to go to old.reddit.com,
  • unamp google AMP links
  • summarize long texts / documents
  • quick answer from the top 5 results

..and so on and so on. It’s just so effective.

[–] aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 9 months ago

… suspicious

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] m_randall@sh.itjust.works 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I always fear it comes across that way when I recommend it to people here. I’m just a very happy user and want to see them succeed.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 15 points 9 months ago

I find it expensive for what it is (given that I still get a limited number of searches) and I'm not comfortable with some of their ways (I don't want anything to do with AI, and I the idea they have of being nonpolitical seems dangerously naive to me). I also don't like supporting non-FOSS projects all that much.

Still, it's the best search I've found, and I'm paying every month until I find something better. It's worth it.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If I had stock/investments in a search engine, you better fucking believe Id also have a bunch of bots crawling for the terms "What is the best search engine" and immediately hijack the convo with bots upvoting my search engine.

I cannot explain how easy it is to do this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sir_reginald@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (5 children)

same. specially considering how privacy invasive kagi is.

[–] jcrabapple@infosec.pub 9 points 9 months ago (12 children)

How is it privacy invasive?

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 8 points 9 months ago

I'm glad I'm finally not the only one feeling this way. I've been seeing them aggressively pushed seemingly out of the blue for months now. Especially for what is such an awful deal and zero evidence to their claims, just citing the marketing page at face value.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 49 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Technically the best one was Altavista.

But they are long gone because they came from the old academic & idealistic internet and they never learned to survive in that internet where money rules.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 26 points 9 months ago (1 children)

From a very old memory, Google blew AltaVista out of the water no?

I mean we all switched for a reason and it wasn’t the cute logo.

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

I believe yahoo killed altvista before google came and finished it off

[–] cll7793@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

Altavista was ahead of their time. The modern internet desperately needs a technical search engine.

[–] kd45@lemm.ee 41 points 9 months ago (9 children)

Many people keep asserting that DuckDuckGo is as useless as Google, but I haven’t had a single issue with it. Could it be a regional thing?

[–] drahardja@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago

DDG is ok for most searches, but they have definitely hit a plateau. Programming search results are quite poor, for instance.

I’ve started paying for kagi. Their results are just way better at this point.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 10 points 9 months ago

I don't live in the US and the regional results for my country are worse on DuckDuckGo than on Google.

But still, I noticed Google's quality drastically falling down in recent years.

[–] sir_reginald@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It is as useless. After all, it's just Bing. But if the results are good enough for you, then why bother finding something else.

[–] Cinner@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Some results come from Bing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] sonovebitch@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I self-host a SearXNG instance and it works really well.

https://github.com/searxng/searxng-docker

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DolphinMath 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Here are some options I use in my rotation.

Brave Search (skip the browser)

Mojeek

Qwant (French)

Yandex (Russian)

Mullvad Leta (Mullvad VPN subscription required)

MetaGer (German meta search)

Startpage (Private Google results)

DuckDuckGo (Private Bing results)

SearXNG and similar self hosted options are awesome, but I’ve found them unreliable.

Be skeptical of Kagi… It’s promoted pretty heavily around here for something that’s not FOSS.

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 18 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'm convinced at this point that Kagi is astroturfing on Lemmy, it's unnatural. All they do is just cite the marketing page when questioned about the quality, or as to why they supposedly think it's worth paying for compared to much more mature as-driven services that do respect your privacy.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 17 points 9 months ago

Yandex was way better for searches in russian sources, but it came to shit just like google and also excludes whatever russian government don't like at that point. I searched for some software in it multiple timea and the first link was some noname, probably malware site. It also promotes it's own malware like browser with questionable russian security sertificates and their own Alexa. I'd honestly not include it in any list.

I like DDG and don't switch from it that much. I've also heard Kagi as paid search engine is good, but I've never tried it.

[–] kool_newt@lemm.ee 16 points 9 months ago
[–] Toes@ani.social 16 points 9 months ago (14 children)

I've found duckduckgo works fine for things that aren't recent.

Controversially the bing gpt chat bot works alarming well.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Krucian@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I self host a searxng instance and I find the combination of bing, duckduckgo and qwant as the source engines to return decent results. You can use a public instance and choose those engines in settings.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ninjazzon@infosec.pub 11 points 9 months ago

This site collects quite a few web search engines: https://www.searchenginemap.com/

[–] Crafter72@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

For everyone who uses searxng, is it great for day to day browsing? Do I require to host my own instance or the setup is as easy as requiring to add "searxng" option on my browser app?

I'm interested to move away from google as it becomes shitty everyday and loses its effectiveness for advanced query (based on my own result compared during 2013 up to pre covid). Bing have weird result on my region so cannot use it, ddg only for occasional use.

Thanks!

[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

pick a host from searx.space

Might be a good idea to bookmark this too because sometimes some hosts go down.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Is "super SEO sites" a catch all term for those 99% filler websites that have a tomato soup recipe (in theory) but actually start out with, "Historical evidence seems to suggest that the tomato was first cultivated in the territory that would eventually become Guam back in 1464..."

I've wondered if we had a common reference term for those? I wish it didn't have a positive connotation though...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Kagi is the highest quality for sure. There isn't a better one, I have tried all of them except perplexity, and that's more like chat gpt rather than search.

[–] chirospasm@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (7 children)

Even though there's a small monthly cost, the results have been consistent for Kagi. But consistency meets only half of my needs for search: I also want to make decisions quickly from what I find within the contents. If I were to to go to a link, wait for it to load, scroll the content, etc. -- does that listed forum post have the answer I am looking for? Does this news article cover the nuances I have been tracking and would like to read more of? Kagi offers an AI-based summarize feature that helps. And that's been meeting the other half of my needs, as well.

EDIT, an opinion: Search services may well be eventually replaced by small, niche LLMs trained to perform summerization tasks, such as Consensus, which I have used for work research, and Perplexity.ai. The AI summarize feature of Kagi is why I see the service as more useful than straight indexes, even when self-hosted. Kagi is a stepping stone toward this for me, and why I recommend it.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] m_randall@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 months ago (21 children)

Come on over to Kagi! You do have to pay but I use a search engine dozens of times per day so I’m not too bothered by it.

[–] cll7793@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (6 children)

I've heard a lot of great things about Kagi, though the search limit and subscription is a little off-putting. A self-hosted Kagi would be amazing though!

[–] ClassyHatter@sopuli.xyz 10 points 9 months ago

Kagi has a free trial, 100 searches for free, so you can try it out and see if you like it or not.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Why would they do all that work to create a better search engine than Google and give it away for free? What is going to pay their bills?

Google pays their bills by selling your data and spying on your searches, not to mention they are morally corrupt. Kagi pays their bills with your monthly sub. Seems a lot better.

[–] cll7793@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago (6 children)

I'm worried eventually even Kagi will get enshittified. It has been a common trend that almost always occurs. Open source is the only way to ensure stability. Conflict of interest is what leads to companies either overcharging, or even accepting to get bought out.

Don't get me wrong, Kagi seems to be a great company thus far! But for something as important as search it would be best to have an open source solution.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›