this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
64 points (98.5% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26996 readers
2084 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Especially after 2020.

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nemo 78 points 2 months ago

It's actively trying to smother other wikis

It's full of ads and trackers

[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 78 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Standard enshittification: They've been pushing features nobody wants and making user unfriendly decisions. I'm sure other people will provide specific examples, but that's pretty much it.

Another thing is that, due to their market position, they won't let people use alternatives. If there's a big enough fandom wiki, google pushes it to the top above any independent fan supported wiki.

https://getindie.wiki/ Is an extension that redirects fandom wikis to other wikis.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They also make it unreasonably difficult to move a wiki to another platform, even if the wiki's owners and the community want it.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Not even unreasonable. Straight up hostage. I'd you post a wiki to their site thry effectively own it, and if you try to close it they will simply steal control of it and refuse to delete it under any circumstances to continue serving ad revenue. Which is what happened to fucking Mojang with the Minecraft wiki.

LPT use the Indiebuddy wiki to purge all Fandom links out of your browser and replace them with the correct indie wiki.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So what you are saying is that you should make a script that slowly changes random articles on a wiki on fandom, so that over time the information will be gone and any backups fandom may have taken are outdated or bad as well.

EDIT: this reminds me of a virus I heard about, it would infect your excel files, and slowly introduce rounding errors in them.

[–] Quill7513 42 points 2 months ago

In a word: enshittification

A single corporate entity wanting to gatekeep our collective knowledge of the things we love is intrinsically a bad thing. It was easy to ignore back when its functionality was basic and the ads minimal. These days the website is bloated with third party cookies and scripts, and it is one of the worst offenders outside Big Tech / FAANG when it comes to implementing surveilance capitalism.

[–] arudesalad@sh.itjust.works 41 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Use it on mobile without an adblocker

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 24 points 2 months ago

Thanks, I need to see an oncologist now.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The only controversy I know of is that those wikis are just straight up garbage. Shitty layout, no navigational controls for basic pages, the information is consistently wrong (like even more so than typical for something with user contributed alterations because at least other sites moderate), etc.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 2 months ago

It's a shame, back when they were wikia and just hosted mediawikis with light ads, it was actually a really nice service.

[–] CyanFen@lemmy.one 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I'm going to second this, the linked video explains a lot of the controversy really well.

[–] HelloHotel@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

This video is a pretty good next video. I consider one incomplete without the other.

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Could it be because fandom is made up of fans, the most argumentative people to exist?

Edit: after reading some of the other comments, that may not be it.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago