this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
364 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19090 readers
6312 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 89 points 2 months ago (7 children)

"Trump doesn’t understand a Florida Amendment," she said Saturday. "Study shows crime goes up when marijuana is legal. Can his advisors prep him better, please? Vote NO on 3."

This sounds wrong to me. People smoking pot on the sofa eating munchies and watching tv are not out committing crimes.

David Biddle, chair of the Gilchrist GOP in the state, said on Saturday, "Don't listen to Trump. Vote NO on Amendment 3. We don't need recreational marijuana in Florida. It's been a disaster everywhere they have it, it brings zero benefit to society, it increases crime, increases homelessness, and increases further drug use. It's bad for Florida."

Hmm. Hasn't been a disaster where I am (California). I think the state makes a lot of money taxing it. But why don't we ask the internet?

This frees up significant law enforcement resources to protect our communities in other, more pressing ways.” Government-published data, academic research, and the experiences of many law enforcement officials indicate that marijuana policy reform does not increase crime rates.

https://www.mpp.org/issues/legalization/marijuana-legalization-is-not-linked-with-increased-crime-rates/

Results offer some evidence suggesting a beneficial impact of legalization on violent crime clearances, as manifested by significant increases in the clearance rate for overall violent crimes and that for aggravated assault in OR counties relative to those in the non-legalized states following legalization.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047235220302361

Conservatives are too stupid to actually verify anything their idiot "news" media tells them. They just know that they hate young people and people of color for loud music, getting high, and having a future.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 49 points 2 months ago

Biddle is actually correct about crime. If you truly believe that black people are criminals and marijuana laws are your shortcut to jail black people who appear threatening, then yeah. Obviously legalizing marijuana will leave more people on the streets who he feels should be labeled as criminals.

I'd like to say /s, but I'm pretty sure when they say "crime goes up," they mean "I see more black people looking comfortable wandering around in public."

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 37 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

In Canada, where it's legal throughout the whole damn nation:

Usage among teens (under 18) has dropped since legalisation.

There are almost no crimes associated with cannabis use aside from impaired driving.

(It used to be a cash crop for certain motorcycle enthusiast clubs)

The government has made billions in tax revenue.

It employs thousands.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

Most of the bullshit talking points out there come from the assholes making money from incarcerations, and GOP psychos have been all up in that forever. I can't find the quote, but I remember the Senate hearing on Marijuana legalization where one of those southern state senators just straight up said something "Think about all the prisons we'll have to close."

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Conservatives are too stupid to actually verify anything their idiot “news” media tells them.

It's not that they're too stupid. It's that they are too biased. They don't want to know the truth. Most of us acquire information and then come to a conclusion about reality. Conservatives, at least the worst of them, come to a conclusion about what they think reality is or should be and then go looking for information to support that conclusion. As long as the data supports their conclusion, it doesn't matter if the information is wrong once they have it.

Edit to remove extra word

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This is 💯.

I remember after the 2016 election I was on Reddit saying how every cabinet pick Trump made they'd just research a different argument for why it wasn't the worst pick ever. When I wrote that they were like, "what else could we do?!". The idea of a politician picking easily understood and qualified people for cabinet positions didn't even cross their minds.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago

Yeah, the crime thing is bullshit. All of their objections are bullshit. Canada is having absolutely zero problems from legalizing weed. It's been a huge positive here.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There is arguably one crime that is an issue with legal dispensaries. Since pot is still illegal federally, dispensaries don’t have access to normal banking, which makes them a cash-heavy business. Which means like other cash-heavy businesses, they’re a prime robbery target.

But there is great solution to this. Legalize it nationwide and let people pay with credit cards instead of debit or cash. Let them operate like a normal retail business.

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

TO BE FAIR... It fucking sucks when I live in a residential neighborhood and put my kids down for bed at 8pm, and at midnight some asshat drives by with really loud pipes or like 12" doubles in the trunk.

[–] NOPper@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

If that dude was home getting baked you wouldn't have this problem!

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 49 points 2 months ago (3 children)

As a human that understands, speaks, and writes in the English language, I don’t think this man understands the English language.

Most of what he says makes no sense and I’m starting to believe literacy is the problem. Does he know how to read? This is a genuine question.

[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 38 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's proven he can't read for shit but the bigger problem now is how bad the dementia is getting. He's way worse than he was a year ago. I hope the magat idiots really like the couch fucker because if Dementia DonOLD gets in, the eyeliner wearing couch fucker will be President not long after.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

because if Dementia DonOLD gets in, the eyeliner wearing couch fucker will be President not long after.

I'm starting to think that's the plan.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago

The man looks like he would fit right in with the rest of the commanders on The Handmaid's Tale.

He makes me want to buy a rape alarm and I'm not even a woman.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

People have been saying for years now that he abuses Adderall. Furthermore he is aging poorly and under a lot of stress from felony cases and convictions. This is a rapid decline and the starting point was not literacy.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Adderall, that is new to me.

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

...it's pretty common knowledge and readily explains his propensity for late-night toilet tweets when he's not busy watching TV...

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So that’s always been curious to me as someone prescribed adderall and takes it daily. I shit all my shit out after my first dose in the morning and then again after I get home from work. Unless I’m sick that’s how it goes, when is he taking it!?

[–] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is your diet also entirely diet coke and big mac hamberders?

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

No but just because I eat better than a him doesn’t mean it’s much better

[–] Floodedwomb@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Amphetamines in general.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Education is absolutely a massive problem. Education in every red state has been beaten into submission. While there's a couple of colleges in red states that are pretty respectable the rest of their education is absolutely the worst.

They go as far as to indoctrinate their schools. Can't learn any race history It might make you feel better about minorities. They're trying to wrap religion into the schools. The uneducated are easier to push around with fear. And their own educational insecurities make them more likely to flock toward a candidate who seems uneducated.

[–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 43 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Do you think he capitalized "LAW & ORDER" like that because it's how it looks in the TV show title sequence?

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

JHONK-JHONK!

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 30 points 2 months ago

Law and Order president means president with experience as a criminal defendant.

[–] Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I can't tell what's more absurd. Trump being for legalizing Marijuana, or the claim that every state that has, is riddled with crime and homelessness because of it.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Crime didn't exist before the 1960s in the fantasy these people live within.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

“Reported” crime was minimal, and the local government was OK if the local guys had their own lynching from time to time if some out of towner looked like they needed it.

Seriously… the 1950s were a time when a lot of stuff happened that was never reported to the police because it was safer that way.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 months ago

Good point. There's a fine book I'd like to recommend: Sundown Towns: A Hidden Dimension of American Racism

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Are these the same people who think history began with the Bible?

[–] ohellidk@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago

Well, I'm positive he's full of shit when it comes to legalization. He's a business owner, anti-union, and caters to the kooky religions. None of these entities working with him would ever want him to legalize the "devils lettuce".

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Study shows" They found one study? And ignored the rest?

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I mean that's been their go to with the Bible for thousands of years. You find a passage that could be taken to mean what you want and ignore the rest...

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago

Raw Story - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Raw Story:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.rawstory.com/conservatives-rebel-against-trump-cannabis-florida/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support