this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
883 points (98.4% liked)

US Authoritarianism

784 readers
414 users here now

Hello, I am researching American crimes against humanity. . This space so far has been most strongly for memes, and that's fine.

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: !thepoliceproblem@lemmy.world

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 173 points 2 months ago (6 children)

This is the intent of the law, not some accidental consequence.

First, make government appear non-functional.

Second, protect child rapists.

Fuck republicans, conservatives, fascists and all their ilk.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 43 points 2 months ago

Third, make more kids to rape because abortion is illegal and the great population collapse is coming!!!!!

[–] ByteOnBikes 29 points 2 months ago

Change the Idaho state motto to "Idaho, where you can rape your kids and they can't snitch"

[–] Zink@programming.dev 10 points 2 months ago

You forgot third, exploit damaged children as cheap labor or soldiers when they’re old enough. (Hence them loving child labor too)

[–] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

The purpose of a system is what it does.

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

also, encourage the constituency to become R strategists.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 71 points 2 months ago (6 children)

What is even the argument for denying a child medical care?

Yes, we all know this is insane and stupid, but for the sake of trying to understand, what is the best argument in favour of this?

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 51 points 2 months ago

Children are the sole property of their parents and no gubmint is gonna tell me how to raise my kids.

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 38 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If a child is trans or wants an abortion, conservatives want the parents to be able to stop that and make the child suffer

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

well, you see, trans people exist, so you must always have the right to rape your children and lock them in the basement and force them into cults.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Always? No exceptions? Like what if you feel guilty?

[–] lseif@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 months ago

Like what if you feel guilty?

then you wouldnt be a republican

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

supply side jesus will sunder the weak!

do you still feel guilty now, coward?

now get back in that (child's bed)room, crusader! rape for the rape god?

[–] frezik@midwest.social 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"I feed and clothe and give shelter to my child. I alone get to decide what's right for them, including education and healthcare."

Thats how it usually goes. They don't treat their children like human beings with their own will, but as property. Authoritarianism begins at home.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

Ya, that unfortunately sounds like it, and they fail to take into account that if there is an emergency their child can't be treated. That's the sort of thing that happens to other people and wouldn't the Libs just love it if that happened...

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 2 months ago

"How dare you go near my child's genitals. The only people who want to that are pedophiles and gynecologists, and that's bad!"

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Cruelty and / or stupidity.

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

always and.

[–] don@lemm.ee 53 points 2 months ago

The Gross Old Pedophiles party hard at work being gross, old pedophiles. What a surprise!

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 50 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm a Republican and even though I'm NOT Pro Rape I'm VERY PRO THIS LAW that allows Parents to RAPE their Children! It's MUCH better then Drag Queens existing!

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

I'm Commander Shepard and Idaho is my favorite state on the citadel.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 41 points 2 months ago (4 children)

But according to their faith it’s impossible that a parent rapes their kid.

But if he did it’s probably his right or something

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What about other emergencies, like a kid breaks a bone at school/etc.? Would you not be able to help the kid?

[–] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Correct. Call the parents first.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sir your child died 4 days ago when you left on a cruise. He got a concussion but we weren't allowed to administer any support.

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

literally yes. the pedo party are R strategists.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 2 months ago

Because "protect kids."

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

kid might get trans'd if you splint their broken toe wrong.

shit, look, im already using they/them pronouns for this kid, and they're still hypothetical! protect the children!

[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 months ago

Republicans collectively breathing a sigh of relief.

[–] profoundninja@sh.itjust.works 32 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

As a non American the only thing i knew about Idaho is this bit from Simpsons.

Now i know 2 things i guess.

[–] Sunroc@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wow Idaho is pro cover ups for child rape? Half the country is fine with that!

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I think they're more than fine.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like a Republican Utopia

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

While generally the phrase "the cruelty is the point" is a great way to show how Republican ideas hurt society, I don't think it applies here. The law is meant to hurt trans people, or children who are sexually active, not kids who were raped by their parents.

[–] LANIK2000@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

Being bared from healthcare is a god damn human rights violation in any context. If it somehow explicity prohibited specifically the things they think are wrong, sure, it's still shit, but sure. But like this, they are quite literally stating that children don't have the right for healthcare, it's a privilege the parent must grant. It's beyond fucked! The parent can legally kill their child now, as long as nobody bothers to file a proper neglect case.

Comparing republicans to nazis is an insult to nazis; they at least actually had their fucked up family values. Republicans just want everyone to suffer more than them.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 months ago

Cruelty is still the point. You're just saying that it's primarily targeted at trans kids.

[–] alphanerd4@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Def meant to put a point on … exactly how would you actually be able to tell where that line of intentionality is? and more to point, .. does it matter, really, a system is what it does and intention is irrelevant. They meant to do something

[–] Railing5132@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is Idaho. I bet dollars to donuts there are a bunch of LDS members that are quite happy with this situation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Isn't there a whole UN rights of the child thing?

[–] Agrivar@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The U.S.A. - as a rule - doesn't ratify anything the U.N. declares. We don't even cooperate with the ICC. Special little (fucking) snowflakes we are.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I love the "we will invade the Netherlands if any US official is tried for was crimes in The Hague" clause/rule

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Geez these USA people sound exceptional. Manifesting their own, whats the word, everyone else's destiny.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 months ago

Yeah something tells me that that was the point....

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Even here in FL, kids over 12 have some degree of medical privacy. The county STD clinic will treat without informing parents, you cannot access health information online (which leads to a really weird few years when I can't because they are 13 but they can't, because they aren't 18).

And emergency services are different as well, there is no way a parent would be able to block a law enforcement action either.

This law is bad, any kid who can't trust their parents is harmed by it, but I don't think it would do what the meme is implying. If someone is raped, that is a criminal offense not just a health event. If medics are asking they ought not be. Criminal evidence isn't healthcare.

[–] SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

Even here in FL

Goddamn, you know things are bad when kids in Florida have more rights...fuckin hell....

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago
[–] vorlaut_boy@feddit.org 5 points 2 months ago

o say can't you see...,

load more comments
view more: next ›