this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
287 points (96.7% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3262 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 90 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I know 0 Democrats that ever considered him, but I know plenty of right leaning Joe Rogan types that did / still are.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 39 points 3 months ago

He was always going to appeal to the low info swing voters.

[–] jumjummy@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Didn’t Joe Rogan endorse RFK?

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 34 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Yep. "He just makes sense to me" or something similar is what he said. Hilarious.

[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Joe Rogan is just one example why it is unwise to give idiots an audience no matter how much money it makes.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I like weed too, but I can't stand the "whoa dude, think about it" type stoners.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm a little bit of that type of stoner, I just try not to be a cruel asshole who's wrong about everything all the time.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But I'm guessing your high daydreams are somewhat grounded in reality, not conspiracy theories and misinformation. I do it too about future space travel, but I know FTL and matter teleportation is impossible.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I wish y'all and I could pass a bong and create a space opera on a sunny afternoon.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Was there a Fear Factor where you had to put your head in a box full of brain worms for like 60 seconds?

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

He did, and then walked it back after Trump got super pissy at him lol

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I hadn't heard he walked it back. That's funny. That's what a Joe Rogan endorsement is worth. No surprise to me, but now it's on full display for everyone.

"Vote for this guy. It's taken a lot of time and deliberation to decide but he's definitely our... nope, wait..."

Time and deliberation? In the context of Joe Rogan?

lol. Lmao, even.

[–] jumjummy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Eh, not at all surprised. Just like that cry-baby murderer, little Kyle

[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

For now till the Hate Mill starts transvestigating him. He'll flip back crying like a bitch just like Kyle the Murderer.

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

He did, but then he took it back when MAGAts started turning on him for disloyalty to Trump.

[–] hoanbridgetroll@midwest.social 20 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

They exist; they may have been super holistic before COVID, and they just latched on to the anti-vaxx mindset but maybe can’t stomach MAGA.

I know one who is a retired doctor. He writes medical exceptions for anti-vaxx rich folks in the area and manically chewed my ear for 20 min about hydroxychloroquine and the rest before gushing about RFK.

I agree with you, though. RFK’s going to be pulling from Camp Weirdos a lot more than Camp Give Us Our Fucking Rights Back this election.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

He writes medical exceptions for anti-vaxx rich folks in the area

Sounds like the equivalent of a pill mill. Dude needs to lose his medical license yesterday.

[–] finley@lemm.ee 55 points 3 months ago

Heh… so, it seems there’s a crazy old man caucus after all.

Godspeed, you bonkers loons

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 49 points 3 months ago (4 children)

You know, I'd be perfectly fine if he became the defacto conservative vote. He's probably a better candidate than Trump, lol

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It'd be hard to be a worse one.

[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 9 points 3 months ago

That guy has the moral fiber of the shark in Jaws, but with none of the charisma.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's glorious. The bar is so low we don't even have to talk about policies or anything. We just need literally any non felon who speaks English in an understandable manner. A potato would literally be a viable choice over Trump. The noble tuber.

[–] general_kitten@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

LOL I have never seen this before and it's hilariously appropriate

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 19 points 3 months ago

Brain worm vs syphilis brain ! Speaks volume about Republicans

[–] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

At least he has some environmental protection cred.

[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yes... Yes... Split that Republican vote... Yes...

sheevpalpatine.mov

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Why is your .mov resolving as a url? When TF did .mov become a TLD?? WHOSE IDEA WAS THAT‽

[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

What the fuck. I thought it was just boost being strange

My bad. Lol

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago

Ah you've never seen redtube.mov

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

Kennedy was a spoiler meant to target Biden. Now that Biden is out, Kennedy will magically drop out and officially endorse his followers to trump as election nears.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 months ago

the pool of brainworm-leaning voters is limited

[–] Minarble@aussie.zone 11 points 3 months ago

Charlie and Frank are driving down a country road and stop to pick up some road kill for dinner only to be beaten to it by a man who appears to have had more brain worms than Charlie.

…The gang support RFK Jr

[–] CatDokki@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But isn’t this the same guy who could possibly drop out and then just go back to endorse trump?

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah, but a good chunk of his voters hate Trump for his stance on the environment. Still, I don't see those voters swinging to Harris, probably just abstaining if RFK drops out.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 3 months ago

Am I going to find myself ordering RFK stickers and putting them up around town? Nah, where I live is decidedly anti-Trump already, but if I lived in a purple state, I might.

[–] HauntedBucket@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

Rats swimming away from an "unsinkable" Titanic.

[–] SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I hope he stays in the race. My worry is that he tries to get a bunch of weird anti-vax concessions from Trump in exchange for an endorsement.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He already tried to get a position as Health something-or-other. Luckily, he apparently recorded the call on a video and shared it on social media. He might have blocked himself by making the deal public.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

...maybe.

Blatant corruption is no longer a problem, apparently. The only problem would be if he was perceived as going against the tribe.