this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
871 points (95.6% liked)

memes

10334 readers
1765 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
871
Bygone Era (lemmy.zip)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by balderdash9@lemmy.zip to c/memes@lemmy.world
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 119 points 5 months ago (12 children)

So maths time...

If that cart is a weeks of groceries, it takes 1250 weeks of groceries to buy a house in 1980.

According to a 2024 USA today article the average family with kids spends $331 per week on groceries.

If the groceries per house ratio stayed the same, a house would be $413,750 in 2024.

The U.S. median home price was $412,000 in September 2023, according to Redfin.

I dunno seems pretty proportionate.

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 212 points 5 months ago (6 children)

That's not the issue.

Average annual household income in the US in 1980 was $20,020- 42% of a house (average cost of a house in the US in 1980 was actually $47K).

https://www.census.gov/library/publications/1982/demo/p60-132.html

Average annual household income in the US in 2022 was $74,580- or 18% of a $412K house.

https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2023/demo/p60-279.html

[–] TheFrogThatFlies@lemmy.world 73 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And "household income" definition also changed: at the time the most common was that only the man of the household was working. So I'd say we are down to a quarter of what was earned then.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 months ago

Damn. That’s some depressing perspective right there.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 47 points 5 months ago (5 children)

I think the most important context is minimum wage.

In 1982 a full-time job making $3.35 an hour is pulling in approx $6,700 a year. Or 14% of the price of a house.

In 2022, that same worker, working the same number of hours at minimum wage $7.25 an hour is bringing in $14,500 a year. Or 3.5% the price of a house.

The same for groceries. THAT is the fucked up part. It's what happens when people seem OK with 50 trillion dollars going from the bottom 90% to the top 1% over the past several decades.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I mean, that minimum wage should be higher though.

At the same time, if you doubled it, it would still be half as much of a percentage of a house.

No matter which way we slice this up, were fuckkkkkkked

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Yeah minimum wage should be quadrupled at the least. But I think the US should have a 50 dollar minimum wage.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] xenspidey@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think that's a little unfair of a comparison. The average house price in the US is $495k. The average house price in Ohio is $273k. Let's take Brooklyn for example. In the 80's houses were cheap in comparison to today. Ohio in the 80's were probably on par for what they are today. There was no silicon valley in the 80's. You didn't have as much of the super rich mega mansions back then. So yeah, it's going to sway the numbers.

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If we're going to have super rich mega mansions, then we should be taking care of everyone at a proportionate rate. If we're not, then the tax for the rich is too low.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 73 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Income. Everything else can be proportional, but if income isn't, we're fucked.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago

I agree the inflation would not be a huge deal but only if incomes had kept up. Couples are struggling to exist today doing two jobs (or more) each of which could have supported a small family just decades ago.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 26 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Furthermore:

  • $25.00 in 1970 is worth $202.03 today
  • $25,000 would be $202,030
  • Home prices vary wildy depending on location and size of the home. It does not seem unreasonable that someone could spend $200 a week on groceries and live in a $200K home.
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 5 months ago

So the real question is how did pay in the most common industries keep up with inflation. I don’t think anyone is disputing costs rising at comparable rates. It’s our ability to keep up as earners.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They also did it on a single income back then.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Combining your comment with this sibling reply, you could say that individual income didn't drop by 1/2 relative to the cost of a house; it dropped by 3/4.

[–] aport@programming.dev 21 points 5 months ago

The ratio of interest isn't groceries:housing, it's income:CoL

The first ratio may have stayed rather consistent, but the second has not.

[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 13 points 5 months ago

Inflation vs income

Income hasn't kept up with inflation, so you have a widening gap

The prices may be proportional, but the average "purchasing power" has decreased. Most family units have more than a single income now, but they still struggle.

Inflation goes up (which devalues our income), but our wages have gone up much slower... so we have a widening gap of "purchasing power" that people's budget can feel

The "prices" may be proportional, but the ability to afford them is certainly not

[–] Cobrachicken@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

So now please do the comparison to income, based on what you think these people bring home.

[–] MiDaBa@lemmy.ml 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It never said it was a week's worth of groceries.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ChojinDSL@discuss.tchncs.de 75 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Anybody else find it funny that her cart is just full of junk? No fresh fruit or vegetables to be seen. Some things never change in America.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 5 months ago

Therenwas a time in the mid century where these things would be seen as great innovations. All the nutricional (i.e. Calories) without the hassle. Vitamins were discovered during the first half of the 20th century and it would take a while for science to conclude that all this processed food was total junk.

[–] wanderer@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The fresh vegetable section is the first aisle in most grocery stores that I can think of. Any fresh fruit or vegetables she got would be at the bottom.

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 5 months ago (2 children)

That’s insane. Sure they’re in the first aisle but they’re either sitting in the baby seat or making their way to the top as I’m loading other stuff.

I don’t like my fruit and veg all battered and bruised.

[–] Heywaitaminute@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

But her husband likes his fruits and veggies the same way he likes his wife...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] maniel@sopuli.xyz 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It wasn't so popular back then, people ate processed food without fear, organic thing became popular more than 20 years later

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Looks to be all grains. I see so much pasta.

[–] Rubanski@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Even the picture itself is grainy

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 52 points 5 months ago

Not pictured: 8 bottles of wine and two cartons of cigarettes.

[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 28 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 45 points 5 months ago (2 children)

nah, just everyone was constantly smoking cigarettes, cigars and pipes. even the kids.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] istdaslol@feddit.de 26 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Tbf she had to afford this with her 0$/hr wage

[–] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

And her countless hours of unpaid labor!

Which oof sure, being a housespouse is often way harder and more responsibility than people would think (even the ones who benefit from it) .. but damn being a housewife in the 50s? You know how much harder it was to cook back then?! Do laundry or vacuum or probably literally any household chore is so much easier and faster than today. Hell, even taking out the trash is easier not having to drag Oscar's heavy ass house to the curb.

[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Between working her $3 an hour job

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)

At least $3.10 per hour, thank you very much! That's the same as $12.49 now.

[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Holy crap I was just guessing l didn't think I'd be somewhat accurate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago

That’s also the average looking 35 year old from that time period.

[–] erp@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (2 children)

This is 1970s, not 80s . Pretty sure a cart full o groceries was way over $20 in the eighties, after a card full of collected grocery chain stamps was saved and turned in. Inflation and all that.

Anyway.. how bout some Suzy Qs, 'Chun King' (is that oriental flavor?), Kraft Mac N Cheese...and Hawaiian punch?

Break out the silver and spic-and-span those no-wax floors; the gobnah's comin ovah to-nite!

[–] Mastengwe@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

The picture looks way more like it’s from the 60’s.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

I'm so glad we moved past Suzy-Qs.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Spent $350 on a single cart of groceries today, nearly lost my mind at how bad it's gotten.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

1980 was not prosperous times. I remember us using food stamps. My dad was working in a hospital kitchen and stole food from work to feed us. Inflation was crazy, gas went up to about $1.80 (in 1980 dollars) and the Reagan era mass unemployment of 1982 was just around the corner. Jimmy Carter famously told the nation to wear a sweater in winter when people couldn't afford heating.

Our family of four lived in a small two bedroom duplex in 1980.

I do have fond memories from back then, but it had nothing to do with prosperity. It was that I was always over at Grandma's house and Grandma was a god damned saint who walked among us.

Go ahead and downvote and deny the realities of a time you probably weren't even alive.

load more comments
view more: next ›