this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
87 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22095 readers
152 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Manufacturers say that installing a couple of 300-watt panels will give a saving of up to 30% on a typical household’s electricity bill. With an outlay of €400-800 and with no installation cost, the panels could pay for themselves within six years.

In Spain, where two thirds of the population live in apartments and installing panels on the roof requires the consent of a majority of the building’s residents, this DIY technology has obvious advantages.

With solar balconies, no such consent is required unless the facade is listed as of historic interest or there is a specific prohibition from the residents’ association or the local authority. Furthermore, as long as the installation does not exceed 800 watts it doesn’t require certification, which can cost from €100 to €400, depending on the area.


As with all solar power systems, balcony power only works in daylight and a battery storage system can add at least €1,000 to the installation cost.


Vernetta says the vertical surface area of cities is far greater than that of the roofs and that, in Spain, balcony panels benefit more than roof panels from the low winter sun.

Cities such as Helsinki are already experimenting with buildings with solar panel cladding.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ramsorge@discuss.online 6 points 3 days ago (5 children)

the panels could pay for themselves within six years.

Hard pass. I don’t trust it will work in 6 years. So, it’s not really an investment.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago

I.can't speak for these devices but rooftop solar is known to be pretty reliable. Our system is nearly 8 years old with zero - and I mean zero maintenance. We really should get the dust blown out of the inverter.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Average solar panels are warrantied to give 100% power for 25 years. After that, they still work but at roughly an 80% rate, with a small fall off each year.

A 6 year payoff is an excellent investment. I'd gladly hang something with zero negatives on a balcony that just made me money for the rest of my life.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They don't drop from 100% to 80% year 26. It's a gradual but accelerating slide, with 80% still warranted at the end of the timeframe.

That doesn't make PV a bad investment; overselling it puts people in the sceptic camp, though, which is what we're seeing in this thread.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Its a general estimate of viability, yes. I did point out that panels drop off a bit every year, but it looks like that wasn't clear if you feel like it needs a correction.

Every comment in here when I posted was skeptical about solar, with no stated reason. I added some general data about actual panels. If you want to add more up to date info, please do.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 4 points 3 days ago

To be clear, I'm only wanting to clarify because I already live off solar. As such, I find it important to provide the correct information about expected panel longevity in general ... getting into the weeds about things like panel type and brand tend to make people's eyes glaze over while already skeptics, which doesn't sell a lot of people on the virtues.

The important takeaway is, yes, this is mature tech that continues to evolve. There's going to be loss each year, as there will be with LFP, so both can de viewed as depreciating assets when ignoring the cost savings accrued over time; however, price trends with both technologies suggest (thus far) that picking up an extra 25% of capacity in 20 years is not only doable but will actually lower the lifetime kWh cost of the system.

The real ongoing cost by then is going to be a few inverters.

[–] ramsorge@discuss.online 1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

If it replaced my need for a grid, I would.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It won't, but the above replaces about 30% of power costs for life for these residents, and pays off in 6 years.

Thats still very good.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

you won't get that from a balcony panel, that's for sure.

honestly, off-grid solar systems meant to drive a house are a pain. you need something to provide a steady sine wave from the DC of the solar and batteries, and usually the best way to do that is the grid. if you want to be off-grid only some times, you need even more equipment to be able to properly synchronise when connecting.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 4 points 3 days ago

With the hell I continue to go through having made spectacularly bad choices in building out my solar, I get the trepidation. But my starting point was the grid being unreliable. If yours isn't, great! That's not the case everywhere, and freezing for a week changed my mind about the utility of being on-grid when I can have far more control for less money.

"Better than what I've been getting" is a low bar, but adequate for investigating other options. I've not correctly balanced everything yet. Still, I don't just lose power because of weather hundreds of miles away, just my own inadequacy at research.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The investment is the number of less people that will die in the climate catastrophe. Stop looking at just the $$. That's insane.

[–] ramsorge@discuss.online 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you think this is going to help climate change at all, then you have been seriously made led by corporations trying to sell you shitty solar panels. insane is that you think a solar panel will have any microscopic impact.

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.org 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

1.5 m Germans using them definitely has an impact. It doesn't solve the climate crisis on its own obviously but you can say that about any and all measures combating climate change

[–] ramsorge@discuss.online 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There is no impact. The technology just isn’t there yet. Mostly because it’s being held back by oil companies.

So, on one hand, if it becomes a profitable business, maybe it will get more support.

But on the other hand, this is just filling landfills with more junk that is designed to sell, not be a solution.

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.org 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There is no impact. The technology just isn’t there yet. Mostly because it’s being held back by oil companies.

Okay, I need a citation on that. How does big oil control solar panel technology?

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago

you've been having a minor meltdown throughout this thread to anybody who asks you basic follow-up questions. take three days off and stop it

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Solar panels have been out for a long time, they definitely last more than 6 years. You can easily look this up.

The warranties are usually 25 years at this point.

Maybe do some research instead of using your feelings to make every decision, you'll get a better result.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't think it really matters how long the warranty is, when the manufacturer is EGHIGXXJKNB from Amazon.

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

Then maybe don't buy from EGHIGXXJKNB?

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Do you expect a fridge to work in six years? Seems you're applying an unreasonable standard to solar in a vacuum.

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 3 points 2 days ago

Do you expect a fridge to work in six years?

Yes, I expect household appliances to last at least a decade. My current fridge is from 2004, and whilst it will probably need replacing soon, 20 years is not an unreasonable run.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Honestly, it depends on what you spend. Many high-end fridges in Europe come with 10 year manufacturer's warrantee. And EU law requires manufacturers to provide parts for 10 years on such goods. So honestly yeah.

That said, cheaper ones tend to make it past 5 (mine is 8 years old) without maintenance. And if I had to replace it 3 times in 10 years, it would still be cheaper than getting the expensive ones. (worse for the environment)

As for solar panels. I am about to replace the one on my boat. It is well over 5 years old and still works. I'm replacing it because I can get 2 410w huge panels for way less than the 100w one cost the past boat owner.

6 years really is nothing for a solar panel. My new ones came with a 20-year warrantee. (something like 85% after 20 year). High-end ones are better.

The 2 MPPTs are likely to need replacing first. But again, 6 years may be well beyond their warrantee. But is reasonable to expect. The lifepo4 battery should just manage 10 years. Before losing significant storage. But that is with the BMS set to keep them from 10-90% charge.

So no, 6 years is a very reasonable time to expect from solar.

EDIT: In a house setup. It is the inverter that is most likely to need replacing. But again, 6 years is more than likely for a quality one.

On my boat, the vast majority of the equipment is 12v, as it's just more efficient. But the cheap (very) Chinese inverter did not last a year. So yeah they can be cheap crap if you don't get good ones. But we don't really use it much. So haven't bother replacing it yet. Will do so this summer.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We agree for the most part ... people unaware of how an off-grid DC setup operates fixate on the parts least likely to fail (that was me, as well, when I first started looking into things). MPPT, fuse panels and various step converters should be the anticipated replacements. They're inexpensive compared to wholesale PV and LFP upgrades.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Grins, actually My MPPT cost more than the panels. £70 for each panel plus £33 shipping the pair. The 2 30a MPPTs £90 each.

But when fitting to a house it's likely to be mounting by a pro that is the bigger cost. So yeah, way easier to replace the MPPTs etc then climb on a roof.

Fortunately, with a narrow boat a can do it all myself with just the risk of wet feet ;)

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm in that in-between use where it's a tool van. So I have acreage for solar on the roof and 1200W. I negotiated a remarkably reasonable rate with myself for the install.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago

Really great day. When you can screw yourself.

;>