this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
85 points (94.7% liked)
Fediverse
28566 readers
575 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I agree with you. IMO, it's not that different.
The big difference is between the tankie LARPer instances (lemmygrad, hexbear, parts of lemmy.ml) and the rest of the major instances.
As a socialist, you will understand I’m sure that constant being slurred with “tANkiE” from mostly .world users is very tiring
They never mentioned you or slrpnk
Or socialism.
They got offended because they support that same crap and they see it being called out.
They used a political slur against entire servers and on the left, there is a concept of solidarity.
Solidarity with authoritarians has a long and sordid history of betrayal and being lined up against walls in the end. Anarchists have had to learn that lesson in the most brutal of ways.
Yep. They only tolerate you as long as you're useful. As long as you don't push back against their mass incarceration, assassination, and even genocide. Authoritarians are authoritarian first. Left or right is a distant afterthought.
Authoritarians are bad but lemme just stick up for Russia and Iran mmmkay.
There's a difference between being a socialist, and blindly defending authoritarian regimes that claim they are socialist. Those instances earned their reputation for a reason.
Make it a stickie, because barely anyone observes this definition.
I am regularly slurred as Russian bot or a tANkiE when calling for peace and de-escalation of war.
Daily .
Have you stopped to consider that maybe you're just an asshole?
No, seriously, you're whining about being called a tankie when... like dude, you're a tankie. Half your comments are just bringing up how EU/UK support for Ukraine's defense is a frivolous waste or similar. I doubt you think of yourself like this but to an outside observer you're deeply toxic.
From my position warmongering is deeply toxic.
No matter how much organizing you do with other anarchists offline, to the .world crowd if you're to the left of Joe Biden you're a tankie.
From my position, the jedi are evil!
Man, they weren't kidding about those federation issues. Just now got the notification here. Listen, you're not wrong that people are reactionaries, this is the internet. Many people need to either figure out they aren't welcome, or figure out a less confrontational way to present their ideas (me included, often).
But all that said: there's a difference between "I think anarchists are largely naive at best" and "This person is a tankie". I can (and frequently do) disagree with all manner of left-slash political opinions, and I'm perfectly happy to coexist with them since they often have perfectly good ideas that come from a position I disagree with, but can accept.
What I can't abide, and what the above asshole espouses, is the brainless regurgitation of pro-russian propaganda. Ideas like "enabling the AFU's continued defense of Ukraine is unconscionable and the guilt for all the innocent deaths lay at the feet of NATO for enabling this war to continue" are what makes someone a tankie, and are what that person keeps saying. That's the shit they get pushback on (and which they fail to understand the negative reactions to), because they're too self-centered to realize that Ukranians aren't some innocent babes in the wood lead astray by a wolf. They are a people who have fought and died, for hundreds of years, to secure their fucking right to choose the fates they make for themselves. The choice to lay down one's life for a cause they believe in, that they dictate, is one every culture holds absolutely sacred. How many martyred anarchists are there, who's names live on in the creed of those who come after them? I'm not even an anarchist and I can think of dozens.
A situation has arisen which has lead so, so many to make that choice, and while every life lost here is a tragedy I grieve over every day, infantilizing the people who's lives are freely given? The people who's lives are being stolen from them? The ones who've been found with their hands still bound, dumped in mass graves? The busses full of stolen children, who will never be seen again?
THAT is what makes this jackass a fucking tankie.
statist cops who routinely perform extrajudicial executions, have largely unchecked mind control powers and freedom to recruit child slaves from pod racing without any sort of oversight
Next you'll probably need me to explain why the imperium of man is evil
You seem very emotionally invested in war with Russia, I don't think opposing that makes people tankies, nor do I see how opposition to war infantalizes the people getting killed by it.
Ukranians aren't a monolith and there were plenty of Ukranians getting killed by their government prior to '22.
Of everything you could choose to criticize the jedi for, of all the many things you could choose, Thought Crimes and Qui-Gon emancipating Anikan is what you go with? I mean, christ, I just said that to point out how cliché your response was, I did not think you'd actually roll with the idea I was comparing you to Darth Fucking Vader.
Honestly there's not much more for me to say to this. Between that and you revealing that you think the imperium is evil (which... uhm... buddy you've missed the entire joke) I think you've made your grasp of political nuance pretty explicit. I won't even try to figure out what you mean by saying ukranians aren't a monolith, or that there have been ukranians dying in wars prior to 2022. Obviously this is true? You do know about the annexation of crimea, right? Or... essentially the entire history of Ukraine? Or every other country? And the active genocide Russia is carrying out on the Ukranian people, you know about that?
Sheesh. Opposition to war with russia does not infantalize Ukrainians, nor does it make one a tankie. War is bad. If I had a magic wand, I'd end the war in a second. I've been to wars, I know exactly how awful they really are. But, opposing war with russia because you think Ukraine are the aggressors, or that any violence is to be opposed even self defence, or because one is deluded enough to think that ukranians are somehow being tricked into fighting this war by evil nato arms companies, is what makes someone a tankie. The Ukrainian people have had a war forced on them by russia, and none of them wanted this.
idk where you got the Vader comparison, but the system that the Jedi were upholding had slavery, freeing the one who happens to be valuable doesn't make them good.
They are the reactionary enforcers/janissaries for that particular empire.
also 'thought crimes' is like when you're getting prosecuted for having bad opinions, my issue is that they let these psychic cops just run around manipulating people's minds
what's joke then?
I think the causes America chooses to support are the ones which benefit it geopolitically, regardless of how "worthy" their cause. Palestinians are defending themselves against aggression where's their shipment of Abrams and air defenses?
(It's a wall of text so I broke it down into sections)
(My apologies if you're on mobile and the spoilers don't work)
Alright, I'm super game to talk about media to illustrate my point:
Old Republic
Okay, this is a pretty critical set of plot points:First: the jedi supported the Old Republic, which was a republic. Not an empire. The Empire's first act was to slaughter the Jedi wholesale. And, the Jedi and the Old Republic together outlawed slavery and emancipated the slaves, often quite violently, ages before the events of the prequels.
Second: Tatooine, that inexplicably plot critical dirtball on the outer rim, was not a Republic world. Thats why Obi-Wan hid Luke and himself there after Palpatine founded the empire (Tatooine remained separate from the empire too), why Jabba runs his crime empire from there and why Qui-Gon had to put his ship up as collateral in his pod racing bet to free Anikan - Watto wouldn't accept republic credits, the only currency Qui-Gon had because they were near enough valueless on Tatooine.
Thought Crimes
If the risk of self-regulated psychic cops is not "getting prosecuted for having bad opinions", or other variations on thinking thoughts that should not be thunk, than I'm not really sure what the problem is. But, if you're at all serious about what hypothetically happens when telepathy is regulated by the state, the Psi-Corps from Babylon 5 is an incredibly well thought out example. If you haven't ever seen the show, I highly recommend it. It's the only piece of media I've found that has managed to make scenes of several people sitting around trying to not have a war feel as intense as the countless franchises that use a generic galactic war as a backdrop. Plus, Vir is my spirit animal (or it's a peterbilt 389, it's possible I'm really bad at being religious).~~Brain Rot~~ 40K
This one is actually really important here (this is the only time in my life I'm ever going to say those words about Warhammer 40,000): The Imperium Of Man isn't evil. Nothing in 40k is evil. Nothing in 40k is good, either, but explicitly nothing is evil. Classically: Khorne is the god of honor, family, faith and self determination. Nurgle is the god of life. Slaneesh is the god of love. Tznetch is the final boss of dyslexia. In 30k, the chaos space marines had a point when they launched the heresy - the Emperor really was hiding critical truths from them in his genocidal purge. And at the same time, the Emperor was right to hide those truths (except from magnus) because the knowledge of what he was really attempting would have itself stirred rebellion (unless he'd just fucking told magnus).In M.41, the Imperium is a totalitarian dictator state which is so brutal, corrupt and repressive that it defies description. But they're not, you know, wrong to be that way. Knowledge of Chaos literally corrupts. A single witch left to their own devices has, time and time again, brought about the torturous deaths or total annihilation of trillions of otherwise innocent souls. The imperial cult isn't like real world state religions because there is real, tangible proof of what they preach. Every voidship relies on the burning pyre of His will, manifested. Every sanctioned psyker draws their control and resolve from His light. The faith of Ministorum preachers truly can drive back the forces of chaos, and as each lowly preacher or confessor's faith is bolstered by the faith of their flock, so too does that faith bolster His own might, and allow Him on Earth to act - through the subtle workings of the Tarot to the martial prowess of the Adepta Sororitas or the might of an awakened Living Saint. And if humans turn their souls from His light, it bolsters His enemies tenfold. Losing faith in the emperor truly might bring about the extermination of humanity.
Boy, that's sure a lot of words I don't want to read - what's your point?
Okay yeah, fair enough:The whole of the 40k universe exists in shades of grimdark. This is the point of the entire setting. No faction is good, no faction is evil, they just exist. There's no hope, that's the joke. Fundamentally, the Imperium would collapse into ruin and death without the supporting bonds that are crushing the life from it's bloated carcass. It's a dark satire. There's no good guys. And while the Jedi were characterized by a man who's literary skill is best expressed with crayons, they're still a more complicated faction than you're giving them credit for.
So critically, if you can't understand the motivations behind the two protagonist factions in two of the largest pieces of media in the whole of human history, media written not for it's depth of political complexity but for it's ease of digestion by (lets be honest) the lowest common nerd denominator, why do you think your understanding of the situation in Ukraine is going to be more reasonably concluded?
No, seriously. "Because it's the real world event and I just don't care about fantasy" just doesn't cut it here. The political machinations of starwars are entwined within every weft of the west's social tapestry. Wookiepedia is the largest repository of meta-narrative lore that exists. The UA war is the most heavily propagandized hot conflict in history. You can't just go out and binge a .wikia about it and think that your conclusion is correct.
And lets be extra clear here, I don't disagree with this statement:
I totally agree. In fact I'd even go even further and say that's true of literally every country in the world. In this case though, the continuation of the conflict is being supported materially by every European country, NATO, The United States and a comedically overwhelming percentage of the Ukrainian population themselves. While you'd be hard pressed to find someone more critical of the US government's foreign policy than I am, and even I think that opposing a coalition made up of North Korea, China and Russia (stars of the hit show "The Bachelor But With Sex Slaves And Genocide") is pretty justified. I mean, fuck, Juche is almost cartoonishly evil. Maybe, just this once, the entire western world isn't wrong to involve themselves militarily in a conflict (the linguistic irony is palpable in that statement) despite it directly benefiting them by strengthening their food, energy, geopolitical and cultural security.
(And, to address the blatant 'whattaboutism' in the room, yeah. The US is wrong on Israel/Palestine. Israel brutally murdered my babysitter when I was younger, I won't be happy until they get crushed into nothingness for the crimes they have wrought - because unlike the US, or Russia, or China, they can't claim to have done any good for the world. Even North Korea gives out more humanitarian aid than Israel.)
I'll be at the pro-Palestine protests and the pro-Ukraine rallies this week.
Will you be at either?
… the root of the problem is your apparent compulsion to call people “toxic” and “assholes” for having different views.
Ah yes, the "no u" gambit. Classic, deadly, refined. The most elegant of rebuttals. A refuge for only the sharpest of wits.
Anyways, do you mean different views like say, someone holding different (and by your own admission, quite common) opinions about how your conduct reflects on your character...?
They're not calling you that for having different views. They're calling you that for making up reasons to offend yourself and acting like a toxic drama queen. And the ratio shows they aren't alone.
And what is your reason for adding your personal attack to this already well populated debate ?
You're doing it again. Me pointing out a simple fact. That you brought up two different things which the author never even addressed. In order to turn yourself into some victim. That is a simple fact. If you feel that it is an attack on you to have that pointed out. Perhaps you need to look inwards.
you joined a debate, just to give your opinion of me.
You should really think about how a fairly straightforward reframing of your actions reads, even to you, like an intentionally negative characterization (or even an attack). If thats how it looks to you, imagine how it must look to other people.
An account of your actions is not an opinion. Please take the gaslighting somewhere else.
Because posting on social media means that you have to accept that anyone can join your discussion.
There's a huge difference between a tankie and a socialist:
How you to choose define it changes nothing .
Uh... Yeah, it does. It literally defines the meaning and the context in which the term is used. Thats... how language works. Fundementally.
Goodness me, you are being difficult today.
I think you can appreciate, that no one user’s definition - no matter how agreeable you and I might find it - speaks to everyone’s definition of the same term.
Especially when we are talking about colloquial slur, like tankie, which isn’t in main dictionaries.
Sure, but it does speak to that user's definition, which is what they were talking about. And honestly, their definition is pretty much the standard. 'A pejorative term for supporters of authoritarian regimes, particularly communist ones' is the definition in some form across every site I've turned up in the thirty seconds I spent on this. It's what everyone else in this thread appears to be using. Seems like its pretty agreed on.
It's fair to call people who white-wash authoritarianism, genocide and roleplay as communists tankies.
This is not a matter of different opinions. They openly support the russian invasion, the atrocities of the russian occupation and reject Ukrainian identity and self-determination.
It's the literal definition of the word.
Says the person who has massive amounts of Antisemitic hatred and are quite happy to full on blow Putin's dick whilst spouting his propaganda I'm not shocked you're being called a Tankie