catloaf

joined 7 months ago
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 1 hour ago (5 children)

You want KVM.

But I'd check the performance on the NAS first. They're not really built for VMs so you might be missing hardware features, but I'd check resource usage to see if you're maxing anything out. And try reducing resolution, color depth, etc. to make it easier.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

1832, though "John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it" is apocryphal.

Also that was Andrew Jackson being a racist so maybe not the best role model.

I'm not aware of SCOTUS directing federal marshals to enforce their decisions. That may not ever have been tried.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 1 hour ago

Just having them there on detail probably costs more than they recover from fare evaders.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

For science and engineering, workstation cards like the A6000 aren't going anywhere.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 2 hours ago

Look man, I get what you're doing, but it's just getting old at this point.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I've used Lawnchair for years and had no issues either. Is there some widespread problem I've been lucky enough to avoid?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 2 hours ago (4 children)

Usually people are against just throwing more hardware at a problem.

They're going to keep making more powerful hardware either way, since parallel processing capability supports graphics and AI just fine. But if they can use a novel software solution to drastically increase performance, why not?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 2 hours ago

It's just another graphics-enhancing tool. But instead of fixed-algorithm antialiasing, it's machine-learning-powered "fill in the blank".

I don't think this application is really all that controversial. Some people are unhappy that AAA games are going to expect or require compatible hardware in the future for no good reason, if the game itself runs just fine without it.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 5 points 2 hours ago

It's also an excellent way to get your recommended daily value of microplastics.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 11 points 4 hours ago

tl;dr: still up in the air, but expect more extreme swings, hooray climate change

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 4 hours ago

Then get one you do want? Or accept that you might not get 100% of what you want in a phone, but then that's true of everything in life, really.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 16 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think he's capable of feeling shame.

 

Link to post: https://lemmy.world/post/19274834

If you tap that link in Boost it'll probably crash, so don't do it unless you're okay with that.

I'm guessing the problem is that the post URL is a magnet link.

Edit: oh yeah, to work around, you'll have to open it in a browser and hide it.

 

I got banned earlier today with the message "rule 1", no other information about why, or which comment broke the rule. As far as I can tell it was this one, which just says "We want the bot gone. That’s it. It’s really that simple."

So I checked the modlog for other bans, and @aniki@lemmings.world was banned today as well, also just for "rule 1", probably either for the comment saying "a stupid bot writing useless bullshit" or "This is what you call "Not listening to criticism."", neither of which are an attack on any person.

(Also earlier today @MindTraveller@lemmy.ca was banned with the message "fuck off", which I'm pretty sure is not a reason to ban someone from a major community, but doesn't appear to be related to the MBFC bot.)

One more today, @stormesp@lemm.ee was banned, again just "rule 1", last comment being this one, again not an attack on any person.

So what's the deal here? I couldn't find any rules for mods on lemmy.world with a brief poke around, but are we letting mods run major communities like little fiefdoms, banning people for criticism?

view more: next ›