kilkil

joined 1 year ago
[–] kilkil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

you wouldn't really be killing 2 birds with 1 stone. You'd be beating a dead bird with the stone, though

[–] kilkil@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

My journey roughly went like:

  1. Mint + Cinnamon
  2. Mint + i3
  3. MX Linux + i3
  4. Debian + i3

Right now I'm using Debian + i3. It's pretty lit

My main reason is that Debian is a very stable, very popular distro, that isn't a fork of another distro. The fact that it's stable means issues are more rare; the fact that it's popular means when issues do pop up, there are much higher odds that I'll find others who ran into them before; and the fact that it isn't a fork means that I can just prefix "debian" to any search, rather than say having to contend with it being potentially a "debian" issue, or an "ubuntu" issue, or a "mint" issue. In fact, debian is popular enough that most of the time I could just prefix "linux" to a search, rather than "debian".

While there are distros that market themselves on other merits, it seems to me that the main goal of an operating system is to be a stable foundation. I wanted to pick something that would let me have a good time with i3; Debian seems one of the most straightforward choices. I considered arch, but in the end Debian seems like the lower-effort option.

[–] kilkil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd immediately spend my actual, IRL money in my bank account on an Uber to the nearest bank machine and shove as much of the cash in there as possible.

[–] kilkil@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

incredibly based

[–] kilkil@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

4gag

top fucking kek