Inwiefern? Erklärung bitte 🙃
The problem with package based distros (everything non-immutable) is, that a distro is very complex.
Even if you manage to "swap out" the package repositories, you usually still have a lot of remaining stuff in the background and many things tweaked by the maintainers. It's a huge mess.
In theory, you could absolutely do that, but to be honest, why bother? You already always should have a backup of all your personal data, so why not reinstall it cleanly?
Speaking of image based distros ("immutable"), the cool thing about most is that that you can easily swap out the underlying OS with just one command.
For example, you can always rebase from Fedora Silverblue to Kinoite to Bazzite to something with Hyprland and then back to vanilla Silverblue, without any traces.
So, for example, if the guy who makes your custom image on Github stops maintaining it, you can simply switch to something else in just seconds.
Maybe this is something relevant for you :)
No major updates yet. The bulbs have all continued growing, and they look a bit like grass. But no flowers yet, probably next year.
Here's how it looks like now (ignore the citrus tree sapling):
I will take a few more pictures and post them here soon :)
Yeah, +1 from my side for Fedora Atomic, especially uBlue.
For this use case, I can absolutely recommend using Aurora (KDE) or Bluefin (Gnome), especially with the gts
branch.
uBlue offers different branches, namely:
latest
: in sync with the current Fedora repos, all the newest stuff official Fedora also ships, including kernelstable
this is the default by now. You have to wait two weeks more for feature and kernel updates, but they are better tested. If something would have broken, others would have noticed and already fixed it.gts
: this one is what I recommend for this use case. With that, you'll get the last release.
At the moment, F41 hit Bazzite/ Aurora latest
already three weeks ago when it landed, on stable
, I got it a few days ago, and on gts
, you have to wait another 5 months until F42 is released, and then you'll update to F41.
gts
is perfect for those who don't need the very latest features, and want something more chill with fewer surprises.
And the other benefits of uBlue/ Atomic also apply of course, like better hardware enablement, QoL tweaks, automatic staged updates, and much more.
9.5/10, can absolutely recommend!
I recommend you Aurora. It is basically Bazzite, which you already suggested, but without gaming stuff.
Why do I recommend you that?
- The auto updates are amazing. Don't disable them. It isn't like on Windows, where it just randomly says "Updating, please don't shut down your PC" midst working. They get just staged, so they are only applied passively on the next boot. You don't notice them.
- Rollbacks: If an update introduced breaking bugs or whatever, you can just keep holding the space bar while booting, and you can select the image from yesterday. Everything is left how it was yesterday. You probably never have to use that feature anyway, the system is super reliable.
- The release schedule. This one is the most important aspect for your case. uBlue (Bazzite, Aurora, Bluefin, etc.) started offering different variants/ tags if the same image.
There's now a
GTS
variant around, which uses the last big release of Fedora, which is still kept up to date maintenance wise. So, you are always half a year behind in terms of new features, but it has been tested for half a year more than regular Fedora or the other images. When you choose the more conservative GTS variant, you'll get way fewer surprises.
After installation, you can hop into the terminal and use the ujust rebase-helper
, where you can select which image variant you want to have
latest
: synchronous with Fedorastable
(default): features are two weeks behindgts
: already said, last release, but still secure and more polished.
I think it is the perfect balance for you between "Debian is too stale" and "Fedora and many other distros change too often".
I would recommend you Aurora or Bluefin. They're both the same, but one is KDE, and the other is Gnome.
They are pretty much indestructible, ultra-low maintenence (staged automatic updates, etc.), different branches, great quality of life tweaks and more included.
It's a bit similar to how Android works, but powered by a common PC.
With the great touchpad both KDE and Gnome would shine due to their smooth gestures they offer.
Ja. Daraus macht man Edibles, die kann man dann manfen ;)
Solange das nicht ausgedruckt und einlaminiert ist hast du mir gar nichts zu sagen Papa!!!1
(/s, in Zukunft achte ich mehr auf die Titel)
Uff. Der EC von 0,6 und pH von 8,5 ist schon echt heavy.
Dein Wasser ist voller Zeug, mit dem die Pflanze nichts anfangen kann, aber was sie trotzdem belastet. Wenn ich mir das so ausrechne (EC gedüngt - EC Wasser), hast du relativ gesehen einen Dünger-EC von 0,3, was echt krass wenig Nährstoffe sind, bist aber trotzdem sehr hoch.
Wenn du jetzt den pH auch noch runterbringen willst, landest du safe bei einem EC von 1,2 oder so.
Versuchs vielleicht mal mit Regenwasser oder überleg dir, ob du vielleicht eine Osmoseanlage für 40€ kaufen willst.
Alternativ, wenn dein pH-Minus angekommen ist (ich empfehle die DIY-Route mit verdünnter Phosphorsäure, das ist günstiger), kannst du 50/50 machen. Besonders größere Pflanzen können im pH etwas schwanken, da ist der eingebaute Carbonatpuffer vom Leitungswasser ganz praktisch ;)
Bei deinem jetzigen pH wirst du wahrscheinlich Mangelerscheinungen kriegen.
Zudem hatte ich, als ich am Anfang auch nur normales (sehr hartes) Leitungswasser benutzt habe, mit so komischen Kalkschuppen zu kämpfen. Durch den Sprudelstein treibt man das Carbonat aus, dann sieht es aus wie in einem verkalkten Wasserkocher.
Wieviel Watt bekommen die jetzt?
4 random Glühbirnen mit je 9W und 800 Lumen, ca. 20 Stunden täglich.
Die Glühbirnen sind aber für diesen Zweck Mist, ich werde mir bald noch ein vernünftiges Growlight kaufen und das Areal mit reflektierender Folie vollklatschen.
Very great report! We need more of those similar to that!
I'm sorry to disappoint you, but even though they look similar to P. cyanescens, they aren't.
Cyans have white-ish stems, dark gills, a purple-black spore print and bruise blue almost instantly when touching them.
Good luck next time! :)