this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
166 points (90.7% liked)

Fediverse

17698 readers
2 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dumbass@leminal.space 191 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well stop trying to make twitter then you fuckin idiot.

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 39 points 6 months ago (2 children)

He was on the board, it's not like it was his project or anything. Imo he wanted to create a protocol, not a platform. "Improve Activitypub" like they always claimed. But then Bluesky realized that they can simply build their own platform and be Twitter 2.0

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He should just contribute to mastodon instead.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 12 points 6 months ago

Its community based so his opinion could be ignored, unlike when he's on a board and his opinion was ignored.

[–] heluecht@pirati.ca 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

@Microw @dumbass No. He wouldn't be happy with ActivityPub as well. He imagines a social network where no one can perform any moderation. He favours Nostr for exactly that reason. Bluesky has got moderation (just like the Fediverse) - which he dislikes.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Moderation should always be client side. Server side should not be able to interfere or even read public content

[–] heluecht@pirati.ca 5 points 6 months ago

@interdimensionalmeme There are different opinions about this. And luckily people can chose networks according to their specific opinions.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dameoutlaw@lemmy.ml 92 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Several of you seem to be misunderstanding. When he says “like Twitter” it’s not in the negative ways you are thinking. It’s in the negative ways he’s thinking. Meaning censorship and being able to ban accounts. He doesn’t want that. Mastodon would have the same criticisms if he commented on it.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 33 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Oh right, is that this new "free speech absolutism" I've heard about? 🙃

[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Unless it is pro-Palestinian speech of course

[–] huginn@feddit.it 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Or speech that hurts his feelings

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 8 points 6 months ago

These billionaires are just regular people with less empathy (there are no ethical billionaires). They have the same braindead ideas we all have if we dont know anything about a topic and are in a talkative mood or possibly drunk or high, or all of those combined I guess.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 22 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Wasn't twitter really good about banning actual Nazis and not banning journalists until Musk came along? After Musk came, Nazis were unbanned and we saw a huge wave of journalists getting banned.

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 6 months ago

Before Musk, Twitters advertising was driven by engagement, and engagement was driven by encountering things that made you angry. So they were slow to respond to anything but the most egregious cases of hatred and bigotry.

[–] Supermariofan67@programming.dev 15 points 6 months ago

It was always pretty bad, musk just made it worse

[–] Jennykichu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 months ago

No... NO. It was appallingly terrible at banning Nazis, worse than even Reddit in many ways. Twitter banned a tiny, tiny fraction of extremely prominent and openly fascist accounts that had been permitted to operate for years, but they ignored Nazi dogwhistles from large accounts and smaller accounts that didn't gain a following and were used to harass 1-2 people were generally allowed to operate freely.

Remember: they didn't even ban Donald Trump himself until he tried to literally violently overthrow the US government. Twitter pre-Musk was an absolute shit hole, but it was at least headed in a hopeful direction. Musk kept it a shit hole and just changed the direction it was going.

[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 52 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They built it to be another Twitter.

[–] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 14 points 6 months ago

That's what I was thinking. Wasn't that the point?

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 49 points 6 months ago (3 children)

bluesky has a robust moderation system which blocks transphobes, bigots, and racism which is why jack hates it.

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It doesn't block them though does it? My understanding is that it simply filters them so that you don't see them anymore. They're still there doing their thing though.

[–] Jennykichu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 months ago

You're correct. It doesn't stop Nazis from having a home or building a following. It just allows users to not see it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jennykichu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago

Uh... source? This runs counter to everything I've seen and read about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kbal@fedia.io 47 points 6 months ago
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 46 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Everyone on Masto/Fedi has been memeing about this since the start: Whatever platform Dorsey's on becomes Twitter, lol.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 38 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Twitter is merely a Nazi bar when what Jack wanted was a Turbo-Nazi bar.

jwz: Blockchain Rasputin over here is mad that moderation exists

It has been obvious to anyone paying attention that the reason Dorsey founded and funded Bluesky was with the end goal of enabling Twitter to go [Spider-Man Pointing dot GIF] any time an actual Nazi showed up, because moderation was not their problem, they just outsourced it to a series of nested shell companies (that they fund) who act as reputation laundries and liability crumple zones.

Now he pouts and says the quiet part out loud.

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 28 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So then he went back to Twitter? 😵‍💫

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He's mostly on nostr of all places...

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 6 months ago

A regular Nostr Dumbass

[–] bquintb@midwest.social 26 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Man...no leadership, no accountability, just a rich billionaire drifter acting like he has principles. Idgaf, I like fediverse, and I like my block button...it's the only alt I've found that isn't a rightwing cess pool full of degens.

I feel like he doesn’t understand that he’s the common denominator here…?

[–] eatthecake@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I thought it was meant to be the new twitter, by design.. wut?

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 6 months ago

He means they are trying not to be the Nazi bar, and added an homeopathic amount of moderation to the platform.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 6 months ago

it's meant to be twitter by ui and feel, for sure.

i'd also say it's meant to be more like twitter from a decade ago when twitter actually had a functioning moderation system and kept toxicity away. the moderation system, which is open sourced and allows anyone to add on to, is one of the best.

i'm subscribed to https://bsky.app/profile/aegis.blue, which blocks or hides antisemites, bigots, racists, transphobes, you name it.

[–] dameoutlaw@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago

Not at all.

[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Why not sell it to the next fascist for billions of dollars and make yourself rich again?

[–] Granixo@feddit.cl 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Has he heard about Mastodon?

[–] dameoutlaw@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Granixo@feddit.cl 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

'Cause we gotta keep the fediverse growing, that's why.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jennykichu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It would be funny if he started a Mastodon instance with whatever his values are. The reason he would never do that is because it's not for profit.

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

I'm on Bluesky and my view of it, at least, is absolutely nothing like Twitter. I'm glad he quit it before he could really turn it into another Nazi-infested hellhole.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 6 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Because — in Dorsey's telling, at least — Bluesky was "literally repeating all the mistakes [Twitter] made as a company."

That's the TLDR from an interview Dorsey conducted with journalist Mike Solana at his Pirate Wires site.

And then Dorsey decided what he really wanted to do was help Nostr, another Twitter alternative, which promises to actually be an open-source protocol, instead.

Dorsey, for instance, has some mostly kind words about Elon Musk, who bought Twitter in 2022.

Though that mostly repeats his idea that Twitter's original sin was becoming a venture-backed, for-profit company that went public with a business model based on advertising, positioned as a Facebook competitor.

But that story/argument isn't a new one — you can find it in this four-episode podcast series I hosted last year, for instance.


The original article contains 349 words, the summary contains 132 words. Saved 62%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Krafting@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Lmao who would have guessed! Oh wait

[–] PhictionalOne@feddit.de 3 points 6 months ago

No shit sherlock

[–] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 1 points 6 months ago

Isn’t this a definition of insanity?

load more comments
view more: next ›