391
submitted 1 week ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Naja_Kaouthia@lemmy.world 59 points 1 week ago

Good for her! I hope she kicks all those rich old white guys right in the dick. Repeatedly.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ew…

Dick sweat on the shoes. (Maybe we could get her a t-ball bat. They have better balance for this sort of thing than baseball bats.)

[-] joel1974@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago
[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Not yet. Not even close to it

[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

We can still kick rich old white dudes tho, right?

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 week ago

God damn, it's kind of amazing they've gone this long without any LGBTQ+ state senators.

[-] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 16 points 1 week ago

Is it really that surprising though?

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

Yea, honestly - I'd believe that they haven't elected a trans person yet but gay and lesbian folks have been widely culturally accepted... there are still bigots but they're now in the fringe group.

[-] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Don't forget we are only 21 years since SCOTUS ruled against the state of Texas and overturned the anti-sodomy laws in the US. Those laws are still on the books and the current Attorney General has said that he will enforce them should Lawrence v TX be overturned.

There are also a lot of gay conversion camps in the state using electrodes and other means of physical, emotional, and sometimes sexual abuse to pray the gay away.

[-] idunnololz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

They have a bunch but they are all closeted ;)

[-] doingthestuff@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

I'm going to go out on a limb and say she's not the first, but the first openly. I'm pretty confident though. I'm not a gambler but I'd put money on it.

[-] ShadowGlider@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago

That's literally in the headline

In that shit state, her life is now in grave danger. Shits states gonna shit state. Hope she stays safe

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Now if only more out of the closet atheists could get elected, too.

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Let's go vote in November!

[-] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 1 points 1 week ago

I thought molly cook was her job description

[-] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 7 points 1 week ago

I don’t know why the joke didn’t land, maybe people don’t realize that that is another phrase for mdma producer?

Either way, I thought it was.

[-] vladmech@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago

So edgy, wow.

this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
391 points (96.4% liked)

politics

17776 readers
2355 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS