This really seemed like a good simplification until you threw in that d'Alembert operator at the end

Sounds like some ~~bullshit artist~~ motivational speaker

I've heard about an extended version of the equation:
E^2^ = m^2^c^4^ + p^2^c^2^
Or E = (m^2^c^4^ + p^2^c^2^)^1/2^

If so, AI = (m^2^c^4^ + p^2^c^2^)^1/2^ - mc^2^

I may have the capabilities to be a technology management consultant

Well math might be, physics for sure isn't

How did it lose so much quality since it was posted just a week or two ago?

yeah it reads exactly like something chatgpt would write

Ist there actually an upcomming alternative for Job profiles and stuff?

I always found the difference between general and special whativity fascinating.

his name is Chatgpt

I mean, the equation isn't wrong given that AI basically becomes a rounding error and can be safely ignored.

Bacon, Lettuce, Tomato + Avocado, Ice cream?

We need a = sign sonewhere, right?

TedX talk? More like:

Step right up, folks, and witness the magnificent medicinal miracle of Simpson and Son's patented revitalizing tonic. [deep breath] Put some ardor in your larder with our energizing, moisturizing, tantalizing, romanticizing, surprising, her-prizing, revitalizing tonic.

Honestly I had too many people insist that Tedx has any value

It really reads like it was written by AI. I’ve never been to linkedin, maybe everyone talks like that there but it really sounds like it was written by ChatGPT