this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
714 points (98.6% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5281 readers
683 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“we’ve waited too long to open the aperture on the solution sets in terms of what we need, as a society, to start reducing emissions,” Woods told Fortune

Archived copies of the article: ghostarchive.org web.archive.org archive.today

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wildcherry 70 points 8 months ago (2 children)

If its too late then it's time for retaliation against those who put us in this mess in the first place.

This guy belongs in jail.

[–] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The guy belongs drawn and quartered

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 63 points 8 months ago (26 children)

Far be it from me to tell a Lemmy mob not to eat an oil exec, but wow that's not even close to what the article says.

“So we’ve got to find a way to get the cost down to grow the utility of the solution, and make it more available and more affordable so that you can begin the [clean energy] transition.”

As per the article, this exec is saying the exact opposite of "it's too late to transition to clean energy so we might as well not bother." He's saying "it's taking too long because it's too expensive, so we need to focus on making it cheaper so we can get there faster."

Is he lying about wanting to hasten the transition to clean energy? Maybe.

Are there other reasons that he is a fiend that must be eaten by the working class? Likely. Article hints at some of them.

But wow this take is off base. These guys do a good enough job making themselves look bad, we don't have to also make stuff up.

[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I appreciate you doing the work to add more context for folks who didn't read the article (myself included 😅)

[–] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 8 points 8 months ago

Lol, thanks. Sometimes I'm the one skimming the comments and skipping the article, so I'm glad I cold be helpful this time. I was expecting to get downvoted to hell based on the rest of the comments, but I'm happy to see that the response has been mostly positive.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I mean he also blames the people using electricity and says they need to pay more to cover the carbon offset costs which sounds a lot like he's looking for an excuse to raise prices and push governmental fees on consumers more directly in this same speech.

I read through the article and think him saying it's too late is like the barely visible take when he's flashing a neon sign of "I'm not cutting down production and you fuckers are gonna pay for it!" And blaming governments for not wanting to pay for company infrastructure changes is hilarious when they lobby to make it so there is no more government insight anywhere else but covering the costs they don't want to pay.

He's definitely on the list but yeah title and thing OP tried to pull from this is so not the worst part of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 62 points 8 months ago (3 children)

We've already blown a tire, so we might as well slash the other four, right? 🙄

[–] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Getting the spare as well just to be certain?

[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Lol you caught that. I no count so good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 14 points 8 months ago

We've...

...said the Exon exec after they slashed your tire.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mannimarco@lemmy.world 53 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Guess it's never too late to put these fuckers up against a wall

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 39 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

What a cunt. Is it too early to waterboard him with frack juice?

[–] supercriticalcheese@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

it's too late, guillotine instead

[–] HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Hey hey, slow down. There's a healthy middle ground. We could waterboard him whilst he's in the guillotine, then when he's begging for air we release him head first

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 34 points 8 months ago

So the implication here is that we should just continue to die? Lmao these fucks.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 33 points 8 months ago

Man if there's one person who's opinion I respect on climate change, it's definitely the CEO of Exxon-Mobil.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 30 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Seize the assets of the shareholders and stop the oil pumps.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not the shareholders! 😱

/s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Penguincoder@beehaw.org 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Reminds me of that saying choose a lazy person to do a hard job. Because a lazy person will find an easy way to do it. Their incentive is to do the job just good enough and with the least amount of effort. The shareholders incentive here is make money. So we need to make Fossil fuel business illegal. The shareholders still want to make money. They'll find an alternative way to do so. OH HEY LOOK! No longer reliant on fossil fuels?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

I know the first mother fucker I'm eating.

Seriously, this guy is looking awfully tasty.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

I'm just gonna use him to fuel the fire to cook real food tbh

[–] DannyMac@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

I'll polish up the guillotine!

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 28 points 8 months ago

"too early, too late, whatever as long as now is not the right time that's all I care about"

[–] Mesophar@lemm.ee 22 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Wasn't there recently an article from TheOnion or such that said this exact thing? Wild how little fucks these monsters give about anyone but themselves.

[–] silence7 40 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

This has been "Climate Change Denial 2.0" for years now. Realistically, it's nothing more than a neoliberal dogwhistle to signal "I'm on board for killing everyone if it's profitable".

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ha! I just saw a post from someone here on Lemmy last week saying this is what they'll do.

[–] silence7 15 points 8 months ago

There are actually books already written about how the PR folks the executives hire have been doing this for several years.

[–] Syo@kbin.social 11 points 8 months ago

Denied, Delayed, Disinformed successfully!

CEO, "Now, board of directors, how much bonus are you paying me."

[–] sweetpotato@lemmy.ml 10 points 8 months ago

If anyone wanted a proof that environmental pessimism is only helping the oligarchs, there you fucking go

[–] olbaidiablo@lemmy.ca 9 points 8 months ago

"Does anyone want to step up to pay?" No, I was thinking we could just tax the shit out of rich assholes like this empty suit and use that money.

[–] bluGill@kbin.social 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It is never too late, don't give up. The earth without humans is generally slightly carbon negative, and there are cheap things to do that can encourage that - it will take 1000 years to undo things, but we can do it. Step 1 is becoming carbon neutral, and with wind/solar power that is easy for the majority of emitters.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pot8o 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

To the people talking of guillotines and woodchippers, I think what you're really looking for is the Brazen Bull of Phalaris. So appropriate on so many levels.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] corymbia@reddthat.com 7 points 8 months ago

“Yeah, just shut the fuck up and give more money, you whining little shits. I’ve got a survival bunker to build. They aren’t cheap you know. “

[–] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago

THERE WAS A MEME ABOUT THIS RECENTLY!!! THERE WAS A MEME!!

It was a few panels, but nearly said exactly the same thing as title.

it was different than the 1 image already posted here.

load more comments
view more: next ›