Unfortunately, that doesn't do it either; you get conspiracy theory type answers instead.
The paper makes a very strong point about how people change minds, and it's not about some personal impact; it's about gaining distance from an ideological community that denies reality, and then getting useful information from people they trust.
For the NYT, 30 days. I seem to have missed one character in the gift token when I did a copy-paste though. Fixed now.
A couple things:
That's exactly the problem — in the US there's an extra tariff on larger vehicles, so the manufacturers face less competition and therefore earn greater profits if they only make big vehicles.
The point of not burning gas is to avoid the CO2 released when it burns, and the inevitable leakage of ~3% of the methane from the distribution system. This helps to limit the amount of warming we get, which reduces fire risk.
"Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down?
That's not my department, " says Wernher von Braun.
When appointing people who have absolutely no clue, he's tended to do better than when appointing those who are actively malicious. Rick Perry famously wanted to abolish the Department of Energy, despite not being able to remember his name, but was probably one of the least-awful Trump appointees, since he seems to have been unaware of its primary mission of nuclear weapons stockpile stewardship until after he was appointed.
Canceled policy = you've got an opportunity to get another one when your current one runs out.
Denied claims are of course a problem.
Houston has significant hurricane risk, whether or not you've actually had a problem.
The problem is that it's capital-intensive; people need to eat and make rent for quite a while before the subscriber base is large enough to support them
It's going to make it a notch harder to prosecute people for bogus charges. The appearance of legality is still somewhat important if the target is cis and doesn't have dark skin.