this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
199 points (95.9% liked)

You Should Know

33179 readers
225 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It's a website that lets you sort amazon by price per ounce/pound/count

https://bangyourbuck.com/

Some examples are:

Cheapest rice per pound https://bangyourbuck.com/search/rice/Lb/US/grid

Cheapest batteries by count: https://bangyourbuck.com/search/aa%20batteries/Count/US/grid

Hard drives by terabyte: https://bangyourbuck.com/search/hard%20drive/Terabyte/US/grid

Been using it for months, and I can't stand using Amazon without it now.

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 37 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Valiant effort, but the top minds of the world, whether human or machine, are no match for Charmin's obfuscation techniques. https://bangyourbuck.com/search/charmin%20ultra%20strong/Count/US/table

Looks okay until you realize that the "count" field refers to different things across different listings. Some count rolls, some count sheets, some count packages.

Comparing prices of toilet paper and papers towels is 100x harder than it needs to be.

[–] ericbomb@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

Curses!

Garbage in, garbage out I suppose!

Charmin really is the king of "1 sheet equals 3, and 1 roll is 2, but our sheets are half the size! So really this roll is 12 rolls!"

[–] AtmaJnana@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I once went on a deep dive trying to figure out whether napkins or paper towels were cheaper I probably still have the spreadsheets.

[–] fitjazz@lemmyf.uk 2 points 8 months ago

I did the same thing with Kleenex vs toilet paper. TP won.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Don't leave us hanging! What is it?

[–] AtmaJnana@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

For the comparison I was doing (it can be hard to compare the two products,) I found paper towels were almost always cheaper (per unit area.)

But that was pre-pandemic, so prices are probably way different by now.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Alice@hilariouschaos.com 1 points 6 months ago
[–] NotAtWork@startrek.website 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I want to find the cheapest item by weight with free shipping, really stick it to the man.

so far 17¢/lb for sand is the best I've found.

[–] AtmaJnana@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

Maybe don't kill our planet for your petty bullshit. Consumerism is bad enough already.

[–] ericbomb@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Ahh looks like it might be the sellers put in the wrong information. Which sucks, cause I was like... surely I can do something fun with that much sand!

[–] Steve@startrek.website 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But 50% of all items I check have incorrect or nonexistant unit price listed

[–] ericbomb@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Yeah some products don't work because the sellers don't fill out the information properly.

[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If you buy the cheapest rice, the cheapest batteries, or the cheapest hard drive, off Amazon, of all fuckin places, you're going to have a bad time

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Getting the best value is frequently an economic mistake for a buyer because it does not take into account the present vs future value of money. Not to mention how it is sure to increase your waste/shrink factor and so can eat up its own savings.

Don't deliberately overconsume just to feel like a savvy buyer. Buy a reasonable amount for your own needs and no more. I get that we all like Costco, but the business model really isn't that good for typical consumers.

[–] ericbomb@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

That's a fine point!

I usually only buy dry rice/beans and the like bulk, which I eat the same amount of every week pretty much regardless. But still only ever buy like a month or so worth at a time.

Getting bulk snacks though from costco... that is a bad move.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

You can get cheaper rice than that in stores if you buy bulk at an Indian or Chinese grocer.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I do genuinely enjoy buying enough rice to last a year. Also bought a great cheap rice cooker at my local Chinese grocer. Idiot proof and almost certainly saves electricity.

I think I once worked out that the rice based meal I'd just eaten had cost less than a euro to make.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I'd love to buy in bulk like that, but I don't have the freezer space to treat the rice beforehand, so I usually don't buy more than 25 (just over 10 kilo) pounds at a time

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why would you need a freezer to treat rice?

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 8 months ago

To kill any critters that might be along for the ride and wanna eat my bulk grain.

[–] ericbomb@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Well this should help make it obvious! Cause you can see "cheapest by pound is x, the price per pound of this bulk bag is y."

Compared to having to scroll around.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 8 months ago

If it doesn't work to factor in all the "click this box to save X amount" buttons, then it's a bit useless.

I'm pretty sure amazon started implementing that shit in order to ruin price tracking sites like camelcamelcamel.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You should know that you can shop other places, leaving Amazon to be shitty without your money in their coffers.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 3 points 8 months ago

Exactly. There is so much stuff online and off and they depend on folks not giving in to convenience. The way amazon treats both their workers and their sellers is horrendous. I make it a point of shopping elsewhere and only in extreme circumstances buy there.

[–] Sineljora@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago

This would be really nice if it showed other vendors besides Amazon.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 5 points 8 months ago

Search for a USB flash drive to find some really sketchy scam attempts. Looks like you’re getting a gazillion gigabytes for a few dollars, but in reality you’ll get a lesson in what e-waste means. Scroll down to find the realistic products with realistic prices.

[–] THE_MASTERMIND@lemmy.today 3 points 9 months ago

Thanks but i'd rather not bang my buck.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I feel like BangBucks.com had a bit more potential for a name.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago

Pretty sure that's a gay deer porn site

[–] Flumpkin 1 points 8 months ago

Wow thanks that is awesome, gotta remember that site. For rice I already found the 50lbs pack that also beats my local discount grocer (which is rare).

What pisses me off that amazon has made it's "sort by cheapest" completely unusable. You find 100 pages of the exact same ultra-trashy product or something related or a replacement part or something.

[–] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

ooh, this needs to be a Firefox extension!

edit: I take that back, no, it should stay just the way it is. It works great!

[–] Alice@hilariouschaos.com 0 points 6 months ago
[–] DharmaCurious@startrek.website 0 points 9 months ago

Sweet! Thanks for the reco!