this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
1013 points (87.4% liked)

Political Memes

5415 readers
2923 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 113 points 9 months ago (7 children)

This is what we're doing

Young people have not been as enthusiastic supporters of the Biden administration [even] before President Biden was elected. So what's different about Gen Z generation in particular, who's known to be politically active, also very diverse and caring about a variety of social issues, is that when they're disappointed in what the government is doing or what the leaders are showing them, they're willing to take the issue in their own hand and try to intervene, try to get involved sometimes by speaking up by their vote.

But by and large, they have voted more than other generations have as youth, regardless of how disappointed they say they are in the government. So if the past couple of elections' trends hold, young people have been disappointed in the government and their elected leaders, but they voted.

[Bolding added]

[–] LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world 35 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The big thing is that movements start from local political offices and can grow from there.

It can start with representatives, the rare senator, or even taking over of a party at the state level:

https://apnews.com/article/nevada-bernie-sanders-las-vegas-harry-reid-6f834efcd0dcc3644ce2365447aabab0

Participate in local elections, back primary candidates. Once the numbers are there at the nationwide level, we can push for a more representative electoral system.

We can push system that uses ranked choice voting like Alaska did. We can also increase the size of the house of representatives to better match the idea of representation the founding fathers had for us. It's been nearly a 100 years that the house was capped at 435

The founding fathers had envisioned a house that grew with the size of the country:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Apportionment_Amendment

This laid the intent that we have 1 rep per 30,000 people and increase the constituents per rep by 10,000 each time the house reached another 100 seats.

Or in other words, the max constituents represented by each rep in the house should be:

30,000 + RoundedDown(Number of house seats/100)*10,000

So at 400+ seats (1 rep per 70,000) would make sense for a country of 28 million. Really, with the wording of the amendment and understanding that the examples lay out a mathematical formula for expanding the house indefinitely (but with more people per rep as it goes up) we would have over a 1,000 reps! In fact, some quick math shows that per the original intents, we would have 1700 reps with at most 200,000 constituents each. This would hold until our population reaches 340 million when we'd switch to 1800 reps and a cap per rep of 210,000.

There's a current "Uncap the House" movement, however, I'm unsure of how much momentum they've been gaining.

To see how the number of constituents has grown per member over the years:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_congressional_apportionment#Number_of_members

In other words, we're being shorted almost 1300 reps!

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 16 points 9 months ago

Wait, we're not supposed to be disappointed in our government? Could have fooled me.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 79 points 9 months ago (17 children)

both parties ultimately stand for the same values

This is an extremely privileged take. Yes, both parties support corporations and capitalism. However, one party also supports the eradication of people they don't like. This is a very significant difference.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Turun@feddit.de 62 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If voting prevents literal murder then both parties obviously don't stand for the same values.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 9 months ago (6 children)

... or one party is more efficient at facilitating murder

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 50 points 9 months ago (7 children)

Both parties stand for the same values? Lol, what?

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 47 points 9 months ago (4 children)

America has a right wing party, and a party of hyper right wing nutcases.

Unfortunately it's a flaw in FPTP voting systems. The biggest thing that would help (in any country with FPTP) would be to move to almost any other sort of voting. Ranked choice would be the least disruptive, in the short term, but still allow for long term corrections to function.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 20 points 9 months ago (10 children)

You know, the values of keeping rich people rich and poor people poor.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Prunebutt 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (21 children)

Both are political liberals (as in: foCus on policies that benefit the wealthy) deal with it.

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 39 points 9 months ago (2 children)

We don't have fascism in the US yet. We have a party trying to get into fascist control. Voting can still stymie their attempts to do so and exposing their plans can cause them to lose supporters. Using the legal system to remove those breaking the laws and impeaching justices not upholding the constitution are how you prevent this.

These things are hard. If it was easy to prevent fascists from seizing power, we wouldn't have ever had fascist takeovers. Stopping fascism from taking root requires eternal vigilance as fascist sympathies ebb and flow.

I heartily disagree with the last panels initial premise: both parties don't stand for the same values. They both share values among some of their most prominent members. Namely neoliberal economic policy. But they are clearly not in sync with all policies: hence only one party attempting a fascist takeover. Ignoring the other things Democrats have accomplished that absolutely help people because they aren't the huge sweeping reforms we hoped for is doing the fascists' jobs for them.

These memes also press for Revolution, which is definitely the dumbest thing to propose at this point. Revolution definitely has its place: namely if fascists actually disband democracy. But a revolution is a HUGE risk no matter who does it. Look at revolutions in the rest past, especially those started by popular sentiment: many ended in a totalitarian government, often backed by the military, who took power the moment the leaders faltered. In many of these instances the people didn't win; they just traded one dictator for another. In order for a revolution to succeed, those revolting need to have both coordinated force of arms and a method of government ready to step in and take control to prevent societal collapse.

But revolution also devalues what HAS been achieved by those still working within the system. The most obvious of these in the US are the great strides unions have made in recent years. Unions went from something only a handful of industries had and were largely despised by the general population, to exploding in numerous industries.

[–] kofe@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

Counterpoint to yours on revolution: democratic systems are revolutionary. Elections can result in the overthrow of current governments in favor of new ones with the peaceful transition being a key factor.

[–] Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

I heartily disagree with the last panels initial premise: both parties don't stand for the same values. They both share values among some of their most prominent members. Namely neoliberal economic policy. But they are clearly not in sync with all policies: hence only one party attempting a fascist takeover. Ignoring the other things Democrats have accomplished

While I agree with your stance, I don't think that conflicts with the panel's stance or the way many of the memes are posing.

I think the point here is more "they're slightly different shades of the same color, but we need something very different." In the grand scheme of politics and views, US Democrats and Republicans are extremely similar, especially right now. I wouldn't discount democrats refusal to step into fascism, nor some of the progressive policies they push for, but these are minor differences in the grand scheme of things. Many of the things many people want in this country are vastly different than either party's stance, and that's what's being pointed to.

These memes also press for Revolution, which is definitely the dumbest thing to propose at this point. Revolution definitely has its place: namely if fascists actually disband democracy. But a revolution is a HUGE risk no matter who does it. Look at revolutions in the rest past, especially those started by popular sentiment: many ended in a totalitarian government, often backed by the military, who took power the moment the leaders faltered.

I think you're blowing this out of proportion. They're pressing for drastic change. Is that revolution? Sure, but it's not necessarily violent. The majority of these memes don't seem to push that. Maybe some do, but those are definitely not the majority here.

I'd summarize by this comment lower in this thread - I think it summarizes the same stance as these memes from an outsiders perspective:

Can you US people make a party that isn't a bunch of ghouls already so we can stop having this argument every day

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago

More important than the president or Congress, remember that you're also voting for a ticket to the supreme Court, and that vote really really fucking matters.

[–] AngelJamie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 9 months ago
[–] flames5123@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Voting takes like 10 minutes

100% false. In the 2020 election in Mississippi, I had to wait in line for 2 hours. My wife had to call into the vet clinic she worked at to make sure she could to take a 3 hour lunch to vote even though it was 2 miles from where she worked. It was so disorganized and so slow.

I’m so glad I vote via mail now in Washington.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 32 points 9 months ago

It was so ~~disorganized~~sabotaged and so slow.

FTFY

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] vala@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CouncilOfFriends 21 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

10 minutes might be the average, as even my backwards Republican controlled state has moved to vote by mail. I get the ballot, do a quick internet search on people or issues I don't understand, and move on with my day in less time than that typically. As a bonus, mail ballots are far easier to audit and recount than those ridiculous electronic voting machines which print the voter's choices next to the non-human readable QR code which is actually used for counting.

I don't have experience in states which put up barriers or hours of waiting in line for in-person and mail voting, and I admire those who put up with that shit

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] synapse1278@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

I would like to remind all EU citizens we are voting for the parlament in June. Make sure you are properly registered to vote !

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (3 children)

It's deeply ironic the use of an Icelandic singer in a meme to justify participating in the performance of the Theatre Of The Vote in the, unlike in Iceland, far from Democratic American Duopoly system.

Unironic would be to use Putin or some well known Russian figure.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 14 points 9 months ago (22 children)

I’m so glad to be seeing a lot more of this type of content lately. It gives me hope that logic and reason can play a bigger role here on lemmy moving forward.

Was getting a bit bummed that it seemed to be a far leftist tankie haven.

[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 9 months ago

Idk why you're equating far leftists and marxist-leninists. Lemmy will have a political bias depending on what your instance is. But the majority of Lemmy has had in the past, continues to have in the present, and for the foreseeable future will have a leftist bias. The software is made by leftists and has strong ties to the self hosted and GNU communities, which themselves are heavily associated with leftists and leftist politics.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 16 points 9 months ago (12 children)

It's way out of proportion to the tiny percentage of the politically active left that doesn't vote or doesn't vote Democratic. It's a feel-good virtue-signaling that does nothing but validate the lame excuses the establishment uses every time they lose to a fascist.

Despite the noise you see online (from people who's mind you won't change) leftists overwhelmingly hold their noses and pull the Democrat lever every 4 years. We don't need to be reminded of how much it sucks every damn day.

It's the ordinary non-policy-wonks that stay home on election day, and it's pathetic Democrats that make that happen. Sane Americans have checked out of the process because they don't see the point and have better things to do. They also aren't here to be preached at.

You don't need the left to show up to vote. We already do that. You need us donating to campaigns, passing out flyers, making phone calls, and countering the endless flow of bullshit from the right, and all the other things that you aren't doing because you are here feeling good about preaching to the choir.

The Democrats have my vote, but I can't stomach doing the establishment's work anymore. Just once I would like to be able to confront a rightist and not have them be able to counter with accusations of elitism and corruption that are absolutely true. Just once I would like to explain to someone how the Democrats actually will help them figure out how to get out from under a mountain of debt. I just don't have whatever it takes to advance campaigns of grift, elitist bluster, and empty promises.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] tubaruco@lemm.ee 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

idk whats worse, having an uncropped reddit watermark or an uncropped ifunny watermark

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago (7 children)

Can you US people make a party that isn't a bunch of ghouls already so we can stop having this argument every day

[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago

German here. He had parties that weren't a bunch of ghouls. Some don't exist anymore or have never been in power, others either replaced the good guys with ghouls or the good guys were corrupted by power and became ghouls themselves over time. Face it, electoral politics aren't enough.

[–] aew360@lemm.ee 9 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Yeah, if everyone voted. I don’t understand why people are confused by this. Just vote. Get your friends to vote. We know that most Americans aren’t evil. Otherwise this entire country would be like Florida. But only like a third of Americans able to vote do so.

You know who votes like, all the fucking time? The ghouls. They love to vote. And we don’t show up. Defeating Trump one more time should end the MAGA movement and then we can focus on propping up a candidate in 2028 who will actually capture the change that we want to see. Midterms too!. But this process only starts if we ensure Biden remains in the White House. You may not like his foreign policy, but he believes in climate change and won’t suppress democracy. Trump will effectively end it via Project 2025, courtesy of the fascist Heritage Foundation.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

ifunny? What is this, 2006?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›