Prunebutt

You don't understand! It's been the deep state, all along! /j

The left should riot too. Just not in that way.

And the numbers don't add up. Just on the face of it when you look at the bullet ballots it's obviously bullshit.

You should watch the video. The guy claiming the ballots don't add up doesn't have any data to show as evidence.

You don't get to police what gender people find acceptable to be called. You're closer to Trump's ideology than I am if you don't get that.

Ok, enough fun. Again: Stop wasting your time on electoralism. You want conspiracies? The US is completely run by lobbyists and capitalists. Liberal democracy is a scam. Read Marx and Peter Gelderloos.

I'll block you now. Have fun hunting down the Illuminati.

Yes. My gender. Don't call me Jack.

Sugar, I'm an embedded software engineer. Try mansplaining tosomeone else.

The source code was leaked. It didn't say anything about compromized firmware being flashed.

sorry, I've got like three other people who

Then that's on you. Don't multitask that much if you'd like to be taken seriously.

sorry, I've got like three other people who have never heard of the fake elector's plot talking to me at the same time as you are, so I have to basically explain it over and over to you guys.

As I've already pointed out. I know of that shit and I don't think it's plausible that it would have worked this year if it was already public and didn't work 4 years ago. Also: I don't care. I'm not an electoralist. Stop wasting your time with elections.

haha, nope, there are groups of people that do things together.

Yup. Guess what: the conspiracyis that electoralism alone will lead to progressive change.

I'll take my own advice and not waste any more time with your stupid conspiracy theories of your useless elections. I'd suggest you'd do the same, sugarplum.

Next rude comment will result in a permanent block.

There's edits which clarify and there's edits which completely change the message retroactively. Guess which one is horrible?

yeah dude if you don't understand what I'm saying that's on you.

That's what the madman shouting gibberish at the town square claims, too.

bully for you. I'm not getting bogged down in your tangential nitpicking.

ok, so I take that as an admission that you didn't watch the video. You've yet to mention one singular point she actually made. And you called her "right wing". XD

what, did I guess your actual name accidentally? The most common name in the states?

Sugar, you're adorable if you think you're clever.

it's insane you don't know about the fake electors scheme and you have the hollow temerity to speak about politics.

Willie knows and Willie doesn't care.

so... how was the 2004 election stolen? The one where the most popular candidate won and all that?

"Cordroom sins"? O.o

I don't like you assuming my gender, homie.

I'd like for people not lying about shit they said.

Edit: so you think that shit went puplic 4 years ago and didn't even work back then would work now, when everybody knows he already tried to pull that shit?

I don't understand how the software sourcecode having leaked means that machines have been compromized. That only means thatecurity through obscurity policies won't work anymore. But that's a horrible policy.

Edit your comment. I don't understand squat.

I get that you don't like edits, but you should get into that because you make a lot of mistakes with what you write.

Wrong. I edit all the time, since I make typos a lot. What I don't like is backpedaling liars.

I use speech to text and then edit manually.

Then edit them before you hit send. 🙄

doesn't change the facts Jack.

Don't call me Jack.

made up your little stories.

What did I make up?

I edited my comments before you asked me

That's a horrible way to write on lemmy.

you can scroll up and try reading for a change.

I read your comments. It's not on me to check every minute wether or not you edited them since then.

also stop talking about 2000

You brought it up, smartass.

the guy was right about the 2004 election

Sure he was. /s

(that's another edit I made again before you asked me the question).

If you write shit you didn't want to and I reference what you wrote first, that's on you, not me.

because she isn't calling for a recount

wrong again. From the transcript:

Over the coming months, officials in every county will be certifying that the election was fair. Or as “fair” as our elections get these days. If that includes some hand-counting of ballots, I’m all for it. If someone wants to file a lawsuit to force the hand-counting of ballots, I’m all for that, too. Election transparency is good, even if it tells us something we desperately do not want to hear: that Donald Trump won the 2024 election.

and just accept this possible conspiracy even though we all know that conservatives perpetrated a similar conspiracy for years ago.

Where does she claim that? I'd like a quote.

Don't call me Jack.