LarmyOfLone

joined 9 months ago
[โ€“] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

I think the whole thing might be a joke? ๐Ÿ˜€

[โ€“] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago

I'm confused, is this a serious take? How they make their money leads to how the game is designed and who for. If it's advertising it's shit. If it's microtransactions it becomes about min-maxing annoyance for most gamers while attracting whales, gambling and is shit. Monthly subscriptions is a model that needs loyalty and should attract people who want to "live" in an permanent virtual game world.

Ideally I'd want a global "entertainment subscription" non-profit that is funding projects for the players benefits and is somewhat crowd-controlled like a socialist bank.

[โ€“] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yeah, blowing up satellites and cutting undersea internet cables would be (a short) prelude to world war III.

[โ€“] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is also a recent academic book (by an Ukrainian academic) about the maidan massacre: The Maidan Massacre in Ukraine: The Mass Killing that Changed the World | SpringerLink

Evidence shows beyond a reasonable doubt the far right / oligarchs were behind the mass killing of over 100 people and blame it on the government in a false flag operation. But people in the west will never hear of this. And if they hear they will dismiss it as conspiracy theory or propaganda. So it's really no wonder people like linus react like this.

[โ€“] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee -4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Wikipedia relies on sources, and humans choosing the sources like newspapers. And those newspapers are more and more inside a "bubble" that rejects any evidence or reporting presented by a competing bubble.

Right now wikipedia is covering up one of the greatest acts of mass murder of our times, because the newspapers are covering it up, or rejecting evidence because it's by the "enemy". Part of this is a defensive posture against AI bots and enemy disinformation.

[โ€“] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

It also has to be a waste of some resource that is rare to not use up and throw away like this.

[โ€“] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 4 points 3 weeks ago

Shithole country. Honestly, together with the issues like voter roll purging and winner takes it all. How can you take this "pro/con" discussion even seriously?

The real question should be why the US is so undemocratic, what the forces are that drive this minority rule and prevent a more free and open society.

[โ€“] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yes but the issue is that any technology will be used to maximize profit, which results in almost always the worst case outcome. We already have the technology for a global post-scarcity civilization with a circular economy.

Those 4 things are just random ideas but anything that is unprofitable or decreases power or destroys massive wealth of capitalists is basically censored in mainstream political discourse. And today effective countermeasures have been developed to make protests useless and reform or revolutions impossible.

But I do agree that this doesn't justify radical anti-natalism. Just teach your children profitable skills, multiple languages, subsistence farming, electronics and how to build electric motors and windmills, how to build a cozy tiny house or a boat. I also hope for technological advancements (like 3D printers, genetic engineering) that allow for a more democratic industrial base.

PS: Kurzgesagt has a new video on this: Is Our World Broken?. TLDW: We need to tell ourselves a new story (but that requires we stop believing in the old ones)

[โ€“] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Thanks, this gemini protocol looks interesting! This would be an easy protocol for distributed p2p hosting / caching / archiving of websites similar to federalist. I just wish gemtext would support bold and italics and hyperlinks.

[โ€“] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

How closed minded they must be, to think everyone shares the exact same despair they do, as well as the inability or lack of creativity needed to envision a better future and a path that takes us there.

Lets do a test. Could you imagine supporting:

  1. Banning of commercial advertising
  2. Abolishing patents or making them free or extremely low cost to use to quickly adopt new / better technology
  3. Nationalize all big news and social media companies and turning them over to the democratic control of their own workers (a cooperative)
  4. Massive wealth and land redistribution

Most people can't because they have been programmed to see these as "holy touchstones" of their true religion, capitalism. And that means only economic power may rule, and there are no paths to the future except the profitable ones. They rather de-federate call socialists tankies and than to deal with the angry dirtbag left. They prefer to exist in a calm apolitical space with a total war on good vs evil.

So please don't insult people who can imagine many paths but also have the wisdom why all these paths are shut. It's just like a physics problem, you can't overcome the political energy worth trillions of dollars with a few measly millions of dollars of political energy we could muster.

 

Nothing spectacular but an interesting car free alternative to suburbia with high urban density and local small shops. If large enough could have it's own school and more amenities.

view more: next โ€บ