this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2023
16 points (100.0% liked)

Linux Gaming

15776 readers
192 users here now

Gaming on the GNU/Linux operating system.

Recommended news sources:

Related chat:

Related Communities:

Please be nice to other members. Anyone not being nice will be banned. Keep it fun, respectful and just be awesome to each other.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is wayland ready for gaming with nivida RTX series? I have RTX 3060 Ti. I wouldn't mind messing with it to make it work if I have to.

Would want to use a window manager like sway or river.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As an AMD user on Wayland who primarily uses Steam/Proton, I haven't had any Wayland-related issues with gaming at all. This isn't surprising, since the compositor used by Steam Deck (Gamescope) is also Wayland-based.

FYI: If you ever do have compositor-related issues (X11 OR Wayland), you can almost always fix the issue by running the game in a nested Gamescope instance by editing the game's launch command.

[–] UrbenLegend@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I still find Wayland to be bad with input lag and frame timings, and that's with my Radeon 680M. Games like Valheim just run way better in X11 than Wayland at the moment. If you're using a desktop class card, you might just be brute forcing your way through some of these issues.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nvidia or not, stick with X11 until you have a reason to use Wayland.

I need Wayland for my packaging work, and one of my devices requires Wayland so I use it for that and it's a decent experience, but Wayland still has drawbacks (weaker automation API, some programs still don't work) so I wouldn't recommend switching off X11 unless you have a reason.

[–] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

The only reason I have is the weak security model of X, and maybe early-adopters syndrome

[–] fouc@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

With recent drivers and recent enough DEs it is usable to a certain extent. There are some known issues document in the release notes of each version. Here's for 535. TL; DR the major blockers are: (1) Variable Refresh Rate doesn't work for some cards; (2) GAMMA_LUT is not implemented (no night light) and (3) Nested X11 clients have synchronisation issues that might result in some flickering or dupicate frames, it's more noticeable on things that refresh slowly, although much better recently. Also (4) NvFBC capture doesn't work with nested X11 clients which might or might not be important for some people.

I'm using it with Plasma; it's OK, no major concerns but my setup is pretty basic.

[–] madmonki@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

545 will have better wayland support. For now X11 is a better choice i guess. (i don't own an nvidia gpu)

[–] arch_linux_user@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope 545 brings GAMMA_LUT support, night light is basically the only thing keeping me away from Wayland at the moment on my desktop. I absolutely love Wayland with my laptop

[–] UrbenLegend@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I am not a night light user myself, but I am desperately waiting for VRR support, which is the last hurdle for me.

[–] KelsonV@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Last I looked it still wasn't working well enough, so I decided to stick with Xorg. But that was a few months ago.

[–] Bandicoot_Academic@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

It works fine (runs with minor graphical gliches) for me but i have heard that its a complete mess for others. I'd recommend checking how well your particular system works.

If it works well then it might be a good idea to switch since wayland does have some pros comared to X11.

[–] taj@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Gnome and Wayland works very well, with amd or Nvidia. If you're a kde user you may run into more issues.

load more comments
view more: next ›