No! Not at all.
this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2022
6 points (100.0% liked)
Asklemmy
43831 readers
1205 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Why is this even a question. Of course not.
Yes, it leads to a lot of good art criticizing censorship
Sometimes, like when S&P tells you to tone it down, you have to be more clever about the humor. Most of the time, however, it's not.
Yes it can happen. Two cases I know of are Polish films during the communist era and Iranian films after the Islamic revolution. Because censorship restricted some popular themes it caused filmmakers to come up with something more creative to both get past censors and still be interesting/entertaining.
You mean Iran had more censorship after the end of the dictatorship? That seems unlikely.
Different kind of maybe