this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
113 points (95.2% liked)

News

23182 readers
2901 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Rep. Matt Gaetz is planning to attempt to oust Speaker Kevin McCarthy from the role this week after the House leader worked with Democrats to avoid a government shutdown on Saturday.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

McCarthy is older than 18, right? Why is Matt Gaetz so interested in fucking him?

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gaetz is compromised by Russian interests.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

So is the rest of the republican party.

[–] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m hoping the Republicans lose track of the counts, and Hakeem Jeffries becomes Speaker. If a few Reps miss a vote, or too many R’s vote “present”, there’s a chance it could happen.

[–] LibertyLizard 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That would be beautiful but couldn’t they just immediately oust him again? Seems very unlikely.

[–] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Well, they wouldn’t be in charge of the order of business, so there’s a chance that Jeffries, in his role as Speaker, could not recognize that motion.

Also, as the other guy pointed out, McCarthy being oustable by a single person was only a part of the dumb deal he agreed to the first time round. But getting a majority of R’s to oust Jeffries won’t be hard.

[–] LibertyLizard 3 points 1 year ago

I doubt he would get a single Republican vote. Not recognizing a vote to oust him doesn’t seem workable for more than a very short period of time.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

McCarthy getting it came with a clause that any single R can kick him out.

I think normally it's a certain percentage. And the "moderate" Rs that vote for it would know that they'd be in this same place again.

[–] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

FWIW, McCarthy is well known in DC circles to not be an intelligent person.

[–] LibertyLizard 1 points 1 year ago

Yes but I think it’s in the house rules currently. I could be mistaken on how that works.

But even if it happened by mistake, allowing a democratic speaker would be unthinkable for any republicans, even moderates of which there are very few.

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Shouldn't Matt Gaetz be in prison by now? Did that all just blow over?

[–] Syringe@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

We're not doing laws anymore. Just for the poors

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah. It blew over. The GOP are untouchable.

[–] Carvex@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The attorney general of Florida dropped the case, probably because his DNA was in 17 year old prostitute also. Birds of a feather fuck kids together.

[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

Gaetz handlers are probably pissed that they were so close to shutdown the government.

Remember: this is the TRUE goal of the GOP. A country in chaos is an easy target for attacks. From outside or within.

[–] JustAManOnAToilet@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"Should've gotten rid of that little shit while we had the chance." McCarthy, probably. It's insane to me there's now some possibility of a Speaker Gaetz.

Especially when he should be in a federal penitentiary for human trafficking of minors.

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Even if it did happen, the criteria to remove the Speaker has been lowered to the point that he’d be ousted almost immediately.

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 9 points 1 year ago

I disagree with Paul Ryan on many things, but I salute his foresight that this is where the republican party was headed.

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 7 points 1 year ago

Gaetz always looks like he’s trying to spell a four syllable word in his head.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Good. The extremists can't get the votes for one of their own, and they won't vote for a "moderate" R...

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

It's not good for those who live in the US. A speaker needs to be elected before they can pass anymore funding.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Wooster@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well… when Teddy Roosevelt failed to gain the support of the Republican Party, he formed the Progressive party and republican voters were split between him and Taft, leading to Woodrow Wilson gaining the presidency.

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

That's great for the future. But the government needs to operate prior to that time. If there is no speaker, then there's no vote for keeping the government open past mid November

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

It will be necessary for the whole refusal to compromise on anything approach to actually crash the system before the Republicans who have gone along with it to avoid being primaries to change. While I would have hoped that something less drastic would trigger the epiphany, it kind of looks like a complete implosion will be necessary for the party to stop giving them ridiculous power like only requiring one of them to oust the speaker.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

I’m more pointing out that a split in the majority leaves an opening for the third option. More the house speaker and less the presidency.

[–] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Thoughts and prayers