Valve dev says SteamOS isn't about killing Windows: 'If a user has a good experience on Windows, there's no problem' : games

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 minutes ago

It's about making money and buy valve ceo a new mega yacht

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 2 points 40 minutes ago

The killing is more a side effect than the actual goal. Got it.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Well yeah... Windows users can still use Steam. They sell games. They don't want people to switch anything; they wanna sell more games.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago

And they want to hedge against Windows trying to monopolise the gaming market. You know, the kind of thing government oversight used to prevent in days gone by.

[–] BigTrout75@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Microsoft wants all future apps to go through their store. Basically like Apple does in Mac. I do believe this is the future for Windows apps. Once that happens, Valve running on Windows will be second fiddle. Valve's only choice is to migrate to another OS or end up like Mozilla.

[–] shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

They'll never be able to force that.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 hours ago

Mac user here. I never use the App Store.

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 20 points 5 hours ago

That's cheeky.

[–] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 86 points 8 hours ago

"If"

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 28 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

See that's how you get people to like you more. Not whatever the hell social media CEOs keep doing.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

They don't care about being liked, they just want to prop up the oligarchy by controlling access to information.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 55 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

its honest a boon for gamers as microsoft now actually has to spend more effort making windows betters for gamers then spending all of its effort on windows for arm and AI. one of the things windows as an OS lacks is that the handheld experience is actually trash, and the OS is a resource hog for a handheld device

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 17 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They tried to make the handheld experience better in windows 8... 🤣

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 22 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

imo the metro take of windows 8 wasn't the wrong approach for its intended market(tablets) it's just forcing it on desktop/laptop users as well as a boneheaded decision.

They need to stop forcing windows changes for ALL users, including to the users that can't use said features properly (as it was designed with touch screens in mind, and not everyone had touchscreens). Same idea with the more recent stuff involving Recall. not everyone has AI capable pcs, so its dumb to include the change to all users that will exist on the main branch of the OS, and would apply down the line to windows handhelds as well, who will likely not need recall as a feature as its using up resources. And im not like a person whose like fully Anti AI either, it just has its specific userbase that may need it, and there are others (like with a windows handheld case) that should not have it at all, as it is likely a detriment to battery if enabled by default.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 5 points 4 hours ago

That's what I was implying with the elipses, I just couldn't be bothered writing all that 😅

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

Competition is always great. To be fair, Windows wasn't really designed with a handheld game console in mind as its target distribution platform. SteamOS, at least its current version, was designed for that exact purpose. Would definitely welcome a more lightweight Windows to come from this though, not just for handhelds but just regular desktops too.

[–] Computerchairgeneral@fedia.io 35 points 7 hours ago

That "If" is doing some heavy lifting in that sentence. Really interested to see where SteamOS goes in the future.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 28 points 7 hours ago

It's easy to understate what an unusual project SteamOS is. It represents over a dozen years of work from some of the industry's finest, is funded by a private company, yet is open source and free for everyone to use. "I'm pretty happy that we've managed to find a balance that's beneficial to everyone, while still being able to help this PC ecosystem in this way," says Griffais. "I'm really happy about that."

I can't wait to try it

[–] DerdWurst@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Kill windows we must.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 14 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

It's about making more steam users. Windows is great, they can use steam. They're going after people who can't afford a pc. If people get a deck or steamos who already do own one, that's just gravy

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 8 points 5 hours ago

The weird thing with this is i became a pc gamer precisely because it was the cheapest platform.

Most homes had/have a desktop pc. The hardware was mostly irrelevant because Low graphics settings where default and actually looked more readable then the dlss blurs of today.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago

yup. valve makes a ton off windows users.

in the end, it's all about money. or rather, the endless pursuit of more.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 20 points 8 hours ago

Windows: So you're saying there's a chance

[+] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world -6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It's not about killing Windows.

It's about slowing making G*mers comfortable with the idea of Valve's own closed off ecosystem.

They have already made G*mers comfortable with not owning their games, loot boxes, micro transactions.

This is just another example of Valve being the money grubbing, monopolistic, anti-consumer company that they've somehow got away with for years now.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 18 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not sure that Valve working to making Linux gaming a smoother experience is a strong example of them being money grubbing and anti-consumer.

[–] gila@lemm.ee 1 points 31 minutes ago

Of course, but that isn't what they're saying in response to the topic of the post: the question of what the point in making steamOS available for PC's is. Is it the main reason? I'm not sure it is, but you can be sure that if it isn't contributing to Valve's bottom line in some way, it wouldn't be happening.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

In other words, git gud scrub

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

git: 'gud' is not a git command. See 'git --help'.

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 1 points 3 hours ago

Sounds like a skill issue

[+] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world -20 points 7 hours ago (8 children)

It is hilarious to me that Lemmy users, who seem to mostly be obsessed with Linux (borderline Arch users except slightly less annoying about it), talk like Windows is such a massively hated OS when it is literally still the most widely distributed and used OS in the world. Like yes, so many people globally hate Windows which is why everyone keeps using Windows and not switching to something they hate less. Of course.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Actually the most widely used OS worldwide is Android. Nearly ½ of all devices are Android while only ¼ of all devices are Windows.

Now if you want to adjust the scope and only look at "desktop" operating systems then yes, that is the majority. However over the past 10 years Windows has declined by ~15%, the majority going to macOS, but a small percentage going to Linux. Linux is generally on the rise, albeit slowly.

Also keep in mind the data I've referenced above applies to ALL devices. The landscape changes dramatically when you look at console vs "PC" gaming. Console gaming is roughly ~60% of the traditional gaming market. So while a Windows user may not become a Linux user, they may disappear and become a console user, decreasing the number of Windows users.

While I fully expect Windows to be around for a while, unless a change is made it will continue to lose market share. It would be a mistake to look at these numbers and think Windows is safe and beloved. By all metrics Windows is going away. It's not going to happen overnight, but 10 years from now?

[–] hoanbridgetroll@midwest.social 6 points 4 hours ago

The kind of people who came to Lemmy when Reddit enshittified are also the kind of people who went to Linux when Windows enshittified. Tech savvy enough to figure it out and zealous enough to stick with it, even if the FOSS solution objectively isn’t as great. (I’m that kind of people, it’s me.)

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

There are a tremendous number of people out there who do dislike Windows, but have no idea what to do about it. They see their computer's operating system as an intrinsic part of it kind of how iOS is kind of immutably baked into an iPhone. They don't really have a grasp on what an operating system is or how to install one, and even if told they'd be paralyzed with fear over the risk of breaking something.

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

You described me pretty well.

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

And you're not alone, in fact I would guess you're part of the majority. But we tend to live in bubbles surrounded by tech savvy people so we forget about it sometimes. And the problem with not knowing something is possible is not realizing its limitations, someone who's eaten hot dogs every day of their life has no idea what a burguer is, is one intrinsically better than the other? Nope, but they're different, and different people might like different things.

In any case, just like the other comment, if you have any questions feel free to ask, there's a thriving community of people who use Linux and some of us were like you so we know where you're coming from.

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Know what, I just might get a few questions together and ask them in one of the Linux subs.

[–] boletus@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I installed Ubuntu the other day on my laptop it took about 15 mins and it was even easier than trying to set up windows

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

Well, if you would like to learn about and explore Linux as an alternative to Windows, I would be glad to answer any questions you have. I've been using Linux as my main or only operating system for all of my work and play for 12 years now.

[–] juliebean@lemm.ee 4 points 4 hours ago

people can, and often do, use things that they hate.

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 16 points 6 hours ago

Switching costs. It's the same reason people keep using Facebook and X despite the fact both are widely hated.

If Linux was the dominant OS preinstalled on the majority of computers almost nobody would make the effort to install Windows.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 16 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I don't think it follows that a product having many users means it is not hated. Just look at health insurance in the US. I'm not saying everyone is secretly itching to ditch Windows and move to Linux as soon as possible but I do think the vast majority of people simply don't care and just use whatever the default option is provided that things work well enough. If it becomes just as easy to use Linux as Windows (including PC vendors offering Linux preinstalled and working with all appropriate drivers) I think we'd see more people switching because of the slightly cheaper cost alone.

[–] juliebean@lemm.ee 1 points 4 hours ago

i'm the only one in my friend group that uses linux, but everyone else has like one or two specific apps they need for work that keep them tied to windows, and if those apps were available on linux, they'd jump ship in a heartbeat.

i'm a fry cook, so my work doesn't care what OS i run.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Switching to Linux is literally free. It costs way more to get a license key for Windows than it does to just download Linux. People stick with what they know, and what they know is Windows is for PC, OSX is for Apple, and they may or may not even know anything about Linux at all. I would even go so far as to say most people would run Android for an OS instead of a traditional Linux distro.

[–] DV8@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Spending time on it, stops making it free. I've used Linux on off for more than 25 years now, but always switched back to Windows because in all those previous instances something weren't working well enough on Linux. I'm not blaming Linux for this and will at some point try again as I dislike what Windows does in the background.

But my time is not 'free'.

And practically I mostly find using Windows extremely easy. Being in IT specifically for my knowledge about Windows obviously helps there. I follow the notices they send out for my job, so know how to turn off or prevent many of the user annoyances quickly.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I mean... right now I'm using windows on my desktop computer because when I installed mint I encountered a bunch of problems (no Ethernet, no wifi, no HDMI out, crashes on steam games...)

I really wanted to use Linux, but the out of the box support just isn't always there. I'm not using windows because I like or prefer it.

[–] Get_Off_My_WLAN@fedia.io 1 points 5 hours ago

That is unfortunate. I also installed Linux Mint last year, and although I've had weird little issues here and there, none of them were major, and overall I was able to use it exclusively for the last seven months. One issue I encountered when installing was actually because of Window's fault (during the drive partitioning portion), since I do dual-booting.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

This thread is fun too. Like valve is giving a wink and a nod when saying Windows is fine. Valve sells games. They don’t care if you play on steamOS, Windows, or a steam powered adding machine.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 8 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

They don’t care if you play on steamOS, Windows, or a steam powered adding machine.

i think yes and no: they make their money from selling games, so they want more people to buy more games from them

… but, SteamOS achieves that in a multi-faceted way:

it provides a fit-for-purpose platform for handhelds and consoles which previously steam didn’t have any market share over, and if that’s in SteamOS they have a massive advantage
it gives valve some leverage over microsoft (if MS controls the platform that you depend on, they can do some pretty wild things and you have no recourse). in this case, they definitely care about bumping their numbers - more on SteamOS means less power microsoft has over them
it creates competition, which forces microsoft to invest in making their own experience better, and better experience anywhere means probably more people game more often

i think that last point in particular is critical: every $ valve spends on steamos is multiplied, because microsoft has to spend their own money to keep up, and it propels the whole ecosystem forward

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Of course Windows is fine. Its the largest and most used gaming PC operating system. It couldn't ever reach that status if it was as bad as Lemmy users make it seem. Valve could care less what you play on as long as they can sell you games to play on it. Which is great, I think more game publishers/distributors should be this way.

Games