this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
305 points (98.7% liked)

World News

39332 readers
2951 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At the dawn of the new year, Pornhub will leave Florida. Thanks to a harsh new age verification law that takes effect on January 1, the porn giant will no longer do business in the sunshine state. The law mirrors similar laws passed in other Republican led states where Pornhub has stopped doing business.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FurtiveFugitive@lemm.ee 13 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

There will now be over 115 million Americans affected by this growing ban. Now over one third of the population, yes a full 34.4%, will not be able to access pornhub in their state without using a VPN. And we all know they are coming for the VPN next.

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 8 points 2 hours ago

And more importantly, these laws are written so broadly that these age verification laws can be applied to any website that the state government doesn't like whether they host porn or not. CNN posts article about killings in Gaza? That's not appropriate for children so ID needed. Left-wing forum that's critical of the local Republican government? Well that's not appropriate for children either so we'll need to see the IDs of everyone that has ever visited the site.

I hope these laws get overturned sooner than later but I won't hold my breath.

[–] Tyfud@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

They're welcome to try, but I seriously doubt they will be successful

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 7 points 2 hours ago

Yeah just about every company uses VPNs too.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

They will just use XVideos.

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

While Pornhub pulling out of Florida (US) may not be the end of the !world@lemmy.world, the underlying trend of pornography criminalisation for "modesty" can easily translated into sexual control and control of sex.

As we all know by now, sexual control is gendered against women and queers, racialised, et al.

Control of sex on the other hand is well substrated in Anti-Choice or bodily autonomy-denying discourse as well as population control for classist, racist etc. motives.

Since when is Florida scared of sex? Since it hates minorities. (IMO)

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 5 points 1 hour ago

It's much broader than sex though:

Florida’s law is HB3. The law is broad. It requires a website that provides material that is “harmful to minors” to provide a means of “anonymous age verification” to its minors. What does it mean for material to be “harmful to minors?” According to the law any material that “the average person applying contemporary community standards would find, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest.”

I guarantee this will be used (or at least attempted) to silence political speech critical of local governments. It's far too easy to come up with even the weakest justification for why something isn't appropriate for children and Republicans have an army of useful idiots ready to parrot their rhetoric and convince everyone else who isn't paying attention to what's happening.

[–] Quill7513 13 points 4 hours ago

further, paradoxically, denying access to porn puts women in more danger. most porn consumers will probably just get a vpn and roll with it. but enough of them will translate their frustration into violence against women for it to be a problem. we know this because we've seen it before. sex work is degrading, dehumanizing, and exploitative, but banning it consistently makes it worse, not better, for the people most endangered by it.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 55 points 5 hours ago

Conservatives love losing freedoms.

[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 33 points 6 hours ago

The milf and step sister markets are about to take a hit

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

"Welcome to the club." - a Texan

[–] TingoTenga@lemmy.world 194 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 29 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, it kind of writes itself, but yeah. Sometimes the easy ones are, in fact, the best ones.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago

First time I heard it as a joke was from George Carlin discussing how wars are inherently phallocentric.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 5 points 4 hours ago

So it can finish on FL's face?

[–] ramsorge@discuss.online 106 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It’s probably a good thing not to put your dick in anything from Florida.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 27 points 8 hours ago (8 children)

The old rule of don't put your dick in crazy

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 37 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Republicans hate the free market

[–] irotsoma@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

I mean, yeah, otherwise they'd want regulations that prevent it from being manipulated by individual rich people, but they have always been against anti-monopoly regulation and other protective regulations.

"Free market" doesn't mean free from regulation, it means free from interference in the supply and demand of the product. But there's still a need to prevent other forces from interfering with supply, including from those participating in the market. If a single company prevents any competition from entering the market, that is what's not "free market".

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 38 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

Pornhub should come out with their own vpn service as a fuck you to the gop. Because while they may not “service” certain states, I’d bet those citizens still use pornhub and other sites.

[–] Brodysseus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Don't want them to ban vpns

[–] Sickday@kbin.earth 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Just curious, but how would that be enforced?

[–] Brodysseus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

I honestly don't know enough about it but I'm sure there's a way, maybe get isp's to flag traffic going to known vpn servers and fine them if they connect users or something like that?

Why, is it impossible or difficult to enforce?

[–] Sickday@kbin.earth 1 points 1 hour ago

Why, is it impossible or difficult to enforce?

Not sure, that's why I asked out of curiosity. But I would assume so; it's very easy to get WireGuard setup on a Raspberry PI or just about any SBC. For example, you could setup a SBC with a usb WiFi adapter, travel to a state where VPNs aren't banned, connect to public WiFi and with a little additional config (changing ports), you're good to go.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 16 points 7 hours ago

It's good to be a VPN service these days. I bet business is up.

[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 12 points 7 hours ago

They can probably include it with PH Premium.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 5 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Does anyone know if something changed with PH in Texas? It used to require a VPN and had a notification of the new Texas age verification law, but now I’m back to being able to browse it without a VPN.

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 2 points 4 hours ago

Nope, still blocked for me.

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 19 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Good.

So crazy how floridians are able to get legislation like this passed, but can't do anything to help their legions of hicks living in trailer parks.

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The legions of hicks love this kind of virtue signaling oppression and don't mind that they're stuck in a trailer park. Priorities.

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

Those legions of hicks see living in a trailer as a badge of honor when it comes to Republican policy even if it harms them. Contradictory to this, they also view it as the fault of Democrats, taxes, and regulations on businesses for why they're in that situation. It's pure cognitive dissonance but good luck convincing them of that.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 10 points 7 hours ago

It doesn't even manage to block access to porn. For god's sakes you'd have to block the entire Internet.

I probably shouldn't say that or they'll get ideas. It's all performative.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 18 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

But it's literally the penis-shaped state!

The penis is flaccid.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 12 points 7 hours ago

If I found myself in Florida, I'd pull out before I finish too.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Yokozuna@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Probably easier to just leave Florida.

load more comments
view more: next ›