this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
335 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3563 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Senate Democrats are rushing to confirm President Biden’s judicial nominees before Republicans take control in January.

Republicans are frustrated, accusing Democrats of pushing through liberal judges. However, critics point out GOP hypocrisy, as they did the same in 2020 to confirm Trump’s judges.

Democrats have confirmed 217 judges so far and aim to confirm 26 more, potentially surpassing Trump’s first-term total and cementing Biden’s judicial impact.

Schumer has vowed to keep the Senate in session as long as needed to finish the confirmations.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

After the SCOTUS bs under Obama then trump....cry and die mad about it HAHAHA

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

It would have been uncivil - and as we all know, the most effective way to fight fascism is by letting them run roughshod over you while smugly pointing out how correct you are, and that they're breaking the rules while adjusting your policies to be a watered down version of the fascists, exciting the fascists, liberals, and leftists at the end time.

If the Dems get another election and don't pick a left populist like Sanders, they're finished.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 50 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

LOL, the qons don't have a fucking leg to stand on. Moscow Mitch unilaterally changed the number of judges on SCOTUS for nearly a year as a gigantic fuck you to Obama and the Democrats and the majority of the country, so they can just FUCK RIGHT OFF with their bullshit.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago

Fucking right. You need to change that account image though buddy. Sadly.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 4 points 18 hours ago

well said. their chicanery with the judiciary goes back decades. As usual they are fine with their actions but when dems emulate the way they act to the smallest degree and they get mad.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 87 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Democrats should have been trying to piss Republicans off for the last 20 years.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 26 points 18 hours ago

The existence of anyone slightly to the left of Rush Limbaugh makes them apoplectic, if we are to be honest.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 112 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

"Republicans are mad that Democrats are doing their job"

FTFY

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 16 points 18 hours ago

Republicans, who are not showing up to do their job, are mad that Democrats are doing their job.

Love to see it.

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 57 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

No, Republicans are mad because not enough of their own party can be bothered to show up to block or debate the picks on the floor.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 41 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

They’re so overconfident in their win they’ve stopped showing up to do the job.

[–] Pips@lemmy.sdf.org 27 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Would he nice if that attitude persists for a while.

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago

The next four years would be nice, but I'll settle for two

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 98 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

“That’s not fair! You can’t do exactly what we did! You said it wasn’t fair, remember? And now you are doing it! Wwwaaaahhhhh! Stop it! I’ll tell daddy putin, and he’ll be very mad”

[–] NJSpradlin@lemmy.world 41 points 22 hours ago

“It’s not fair that you can do what you’re permitted to do! You should do what we want you to do! Remember when you didn’t get to confirm SCOTUS judges? That was more fair because it helped us!”

[–] ZeroCool 14 points 22 hours ago

"Copycats!!!1!!" - the party of petulant children

[–] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 87 points 23 hours ago

Yeah? Fuck em

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 24 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

We don't negotiate with terrorists.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

We don't but the DNC sadly does more often than not

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Scratch a liberal...

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 15 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Could any of this been done 4 years ago?

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 42 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Apparently this is one of the things the Biden admin was doing consistently over all its four years.

This last flurry is only so that he confirms more than Trump did.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 16 points 18 hours ago

This last flurry is only so that he confirms more than Trump did.

I really doubt this a dick measuring contest.

It's to stop Trump from putting more sycophants and fascists in these positions.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago

I expect part of it is that enough Republican senators have gone home for the season.

[–] jherazob@fedia.io 11 points 21 hours ago

Too damn bad then, hopefully this will help