this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
819 points (99.3% liked)

Linux

48698 readers
1493 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 198 points 1 month ago (13 children)

Ah hahahaha!!!!

Windows! Some dumbass put Windows on a supercomputer!

[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 73 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] Allero@lemmy.today 64 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Ironically, even Microsoft uses Linux in its Azure datacenters, iirc

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org 19 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Good point.

But still, the 30% efficient supercomputer.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FuryMaker@lemmy.world 46 points 1 month ago

Probably need one, just for the benchmark comparisons.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 96 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

So basically, everybody switched from expensive UNIX™ to cheap "unix"-in-all-but-trademark-certification once it became feasible, and otherwise nothing has changed in 30 years.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

Except this time the Unix-like took 100% of the market

Was too clear this thing is just better

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 53 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] superkret@feddit.org 97 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

The Big Mac. 3rd fastest when it was built and also the cheapest, costing only $5.2 million.

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Interesting. It's like those data centers that ran on thousands of Xboxes

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wha?

(searches interwebs)

Wow, that completely passed me by...

[–] Grimpen@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I think it was PS3 that shipped with "Other OS" functionality, and were sold a little cheaper than production costs would indicate, to make it up on games.

Only thing is, a bunch of institutions discovered you could order a pallet of PS3's, set up Linux, and have a pretty skookum cluster for cheap.

I'm pretty sure Sony dropped "Other OS" not because of vague concerns of piracy, but because they were effectively subsidizing supercomputers.

Don't know if any of those PS3 clusters made it onto Top500.

[–] infeeeee@lemm.ee 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It was 33rd in 2010:

In November 2010, the Air Force Research Laboratory created a powerful supercomputer, nicknamed the "Condor Cluster", by connecting together 1,760 consoles with 168 GPUs and 84 coordinating servers in a parallel array capable of 500 trillion floating-point operations per second (500 TFLOPS). As built, the Condor Cluster was the 33rd largest supercomputer in the world and was used to analyze high definition satellite imagery at a cost of only one tenth that of a traditional supercomputer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_3_cluster

https://scx2.b-cdn.net/gfx/news/hires/playstations.jpg

https://phys.org/news/2010-12-air-playstation-3s-supercomputer.html

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 month ago

Oh Xserve, we hardly knew ye 😢

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Mac is a flavor of Unix, not that surprising really.

[–] theotherben@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago

Mac is also also derived from BSD since it is built on Darwin

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cbarrick@lemmy.world 51 points 1 month ago (3 children)

So you're telling me that there was a Mac super computer in '05?

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] spookedintownsville@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Also known as Big Mac

haha

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If I recall correctly they linked a bunch of powermacs together with FireWire.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] menemen@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Surprised to learn that there were windows based Supercomputers.

[–] Spezi@feddit.org 62 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Those were the basic entry level configurations needed to run Windows Vista with Aero effects.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Z3k3@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (2 children)

As someone who worked on designing racks in the super computer space about 10 q5vyrs ago I had no clue windows and mac even tried to entered the space

[–] gerdesj@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

about 10 q5vyrs ago

Have you been distracted and typed a password/PSK in the wrong field 8)

[–] Z3k3@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Lol typing on phone plus bevy. Can't defend it beyond that

[–] superkret@feddit.org 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There was a time when a bunch of organisations made their own supercomputers by just clustering a lot of regular computers:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_X_(supercomputer)

For Windows I couldn't find anything.
If you google "Windows supercomputer", you just get lots of results about Microsoft supercomputers, which of course all run on Linux.

[–] olosta@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (9 children)

No there was HPC sku of Windows 2003 and 2008 : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Server_2003#Windows_Compute_Cluster_Server

Microsoft earnestly tried to enter the space with a deployment system, a job scheduler and an MPI implementation. Licenses were quite cheap and they were pushing hard with free consulting and support, but it did not stick.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Wow, that's kind of a lot more Linux than I was expecting, but it also makes sense. Pretty cool tbh.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Now the real question is what package manager are they using? apt or yum? Lol

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

they specifically built it to only use snaps

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They are using pacman obviously :)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] virku@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Would the one made out of playstations be in this statistic?

[–] superkret@feddit.org 28 points 1 month ago

I think you can actually see it in the graph.
The Condor Cluster with its 500 Teraflops would have been in the Top 500 supercomputers from 2009 till ~2014.
The PS3 operating system is a BSD, and you can see a thin yellow line in that exact time frame.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] synestia@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I saw the thumbnail and thought this was a map of The Netherlands

[–] superkret@feddit.org 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

One of the Top 500 supercountries

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ComradeMiao@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] jwt@programming.dev 67 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (4 children)

When you really have to look deep into god's mind you just have to put templeOS on a supercomputer.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] superkret@feddit.org 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

You mean the NA/Mixed category?
Probably mostly z/OS and BS2000

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Mwa@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Maybe windows is not used in supercomputers often because unix and linux is more flexiable for the cpus they use(Power9,Sparc,etc)

[–] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (14 children)

Plus Linux doesn't limit you in the number of drives, whereas Windows limits you from A to Z. I read it here.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zucca@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 month ago

"Is your UNIX Linux compatible?"

load more comments
view more: next ›