Big +1 for Sync.
I was paying for Sync back when it was a Reddit client, and I moved to Lemmy mostly because that is where Sync moved.
It's an awesome app. Best app purchase I've ever made. (There is a free version too.)
Big +1 for Sync.
I was paying for Sync back when it was a Reddit client, and I moved to Lemmy mostly because that is where Sync moved.
It's an awesome app. Best app purchase I've ever made. (There is a free version too.)
What could Twitter possibly offer to make me switch banks?
What could Twitter possibly offer to make me switch brokers?
What could Twitter possibly offer to make me switch from Venmo and PayPal?
Which Americans are not in a similar position?
X Payments is doomed to fail. He missed the boat. The market is already saturated, and they've lost all brand loyalty.
And were they any good?
My car runs Android Automotive^1 on an Intel Atom and performance is trash. I would hate to have a phone on the same platform.
^1 As in, the car runs Android directly, not Android Auto running from a phone.
So they tried to open a research center to steal Chinese talent (that has since been closed) and they released the Google Translate app on the Xiaomi store...
That's not the same as supporting the CCP and the Uyghur genocide.
What are you talking about?
Google doesn't operate in China, much less do work for the CCP.
"Getting fired felt like a possibility but never a reality,"
They took over an executive's office and a cafeteria. Not knowing that you'd be fired as a result is a severe lack of judgement.
Protests are important. But you have to understand that there will be consequences for your actions. Embrace that going in.
Saying that you didn't think they'd actually fire you comes off as childish.
That's exactly what I'm hinting at.
My hypothesis is that this is, in fact, the case.
Maybe the reps aren't thinking this deliberately, but I suppose some in R strategy has realized this. They can tell the reps something simple like "FEMA response is likely to be bad for us in the election," and the reps can be willfully ignorant, refusing to consider the consequences of their inaction.
Low voter turnout benefits Republicans.
It's easier to prevent people from voting against you than it is to convert people to vote for you.
The game plan is to ensure chaos continues for the next few weeks until the election, in the hopes that people will be too busy trying to survive than to vote.
I wouldn't be so sure about how "solid" the R position is in Western NC.
I know plenty of people in the Franklin/Highlands area who are voting D despite traditionally voting R.
The area still leans red overall, but it is much more purple today than it has been historically. Plenty of people are sick of Trump.
Republicans benefit from low turnout in a political climate like that.
The hurricane has wrecked lots of the south. Especially North Carolina.
It would be really convenient for the Republicans if that caused low voter turnout next month.
North Carolina is a battleground state this year.
Edit: Also, Asheville is one of the most Democrat areas of the state, and was also hit the hardest. It is pretty clear that he wants people to live hard or die to improve the Republican chances in November.
BUT good poll results aren't just "we polled 1,000 people and here's who they're voting for."
Good pollsters take demographic data when they poll. They model the biases of different demos, and they correct for those biases in their models.
Yes, reducing underrepresentation at poll time would be ideal. But pollsters are smart and are doing their best to put out good models. Pollsters know Gen Z is underrepresented and are accounting for that already.
In other words, don't let Gen Z underrepresentation in the polls lull you into a false sense of security. The polls are accurate. The race is neck and neck.