this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
37 points (95.1% liked)

Green Energy

2226 readers
80 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] keepthepace 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

To me that mostly means free or cheaper than zero electricity during peak time. That's going to cause a total shift of mentalities as many "too inefficient" things will become a possibility.

[–] LibertyLizard 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’ve wondered about this too but it depends on how the utilities choose to structure pricing. Traditionally, negative energy prices have mainly existed in the wholesale market, not for individual energy consumers. But if that situation becomes more common, there may be incentives to adjust pricing structures.

That said, it utilities stand in the way and solar becomes cheap enough, it might start to make sense for energy-hungry customers who have the space to just build out their own system on site.

I am really hoping this can be a game changer for desalination because water shortages are already a major issue in arid places and those problems are not getting better any time soon.

[–] keepthepace 3 points 1 month ago

I think the first place that will switch seriously to solar will attract a lot of energy-heavy industries that can have intermittent production but I suspect it will just be a bonus for the first country to do it.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago

I imagine it'll shift the mentally on electric heating (mainly through heat pumps) first. People have been outright hostile towards it, but once energy's free or negatively priced at peak, people will want to make the switch. People who own a large reservoir and a decently sized battery might be able to not pay for any heating or electricity in a good month.

As for industry, those that can allow for flexible production schedules will and in parts already have adapted to fluctuating energy prices. Whether that means less production in winter, or just adjust workflow so peak demand is during peak supply

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It is a sign of market opportunity and batteries will come into play more.

But it will always be cheaper in the middle of the day so demand shift would be good.

Things like heating, cooling, water, washing, cleaning, charging. All being done in the middle of the day will be the easy wins.

But certainly in high production low usage times the arse is going to fall out of the price. But really how many processes can run for short durations? Most high energy processes are high capital and run 24/7.

[–] keepthepace 1 points 1 month ago

Hopefully we will get to the time where atmospheric carbon scrubbing will be acceptable to discuss.

[–] MalReynolds 2 points 1 month ago

Get access to global coverage at an exclusive 20% discount at https://economist.com/moneymacroFurther reading mentioned in video: Goodbye oil: https://www.ec...

Could you kindly fuck off

Immediate disregard.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

Exponential

Battery prices plummetting, and V2G from EVs, is a path for near tropical regions to get to 90% solar energy. Robotics based manufacturing shifting to those regions is also a likely shift. Northern lattitude quality of life from global warming, is still a nice source of population attractiveness. Hydrogen made from solar is the path to 100% renewables and solar everywhere. Canada is a decent place for solar because of extremely long summer days. Canada can both make H2 in summer, and use H2 in winter. Even near tropical locations would have large spring and fall surpluses to cover near full summer demand from solar. They also need to make H2 from those surpluses.