this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
100 points (99.0% liked)

Solarpunk Urbanism

1754 readers
148 users here now

A community to discuss solarpunk and other new and alternative urbanisms that seek to break away from our currently ecologically destructive urbanisms.

Checkout these related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Now actually make them 3D by using a level crossing

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

My city floated the idea of pothole decals a decade or two ago. It never happened, but it would have been bad. Lots of rear endings predicted.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 22 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I'm all for wanting to slow down vehicles, but confusing drivers with optical illusions isn't the way.

For safety, infrastructure needs to be consistent and universally applied.

Add an actual speed bump to every crossing if you want to slow vehicles down.

[–] milesmcbain@fosstodon.org 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

@Showroom7561 @poVoq Speed bumps are becomming less effective due to the proliferation of off-road spec SUVs and Trucks as the family driver.

I used to live right opposite one and regularly saw these vehicles barrel over it at 3x the speed limit without the slightest hesitation.

[–] milesmcbain@fosstodon.org 5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

@Showroom7561 @poVoq This kind of stuff is a great option to force compliance.

In Japan I saw they put grids of lights down on the ground at road works. The lights move towards the driver in waves creating illusion of them moving much faster which cause them to ease back in accelerator. Genius!

[–] DavidPenington@mastodon.au 3 points 10 hours ago

@milesmcbain @Showroom7561 @poVoq
Locals get used to whatever they encounter regularly. I know which humps are rough & which I can cruise over on my regular route.
Also, distracting drivers as they approach a pedestrian crossing is a really bad idea. This optical illusion will distract drivers from checking for approaching pedestrians.

[–] kurikai@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

A better way is to actually raise the crossing.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 11 hours ago

and that's just the minimum effort solution, for extra credit add chicaning before the crossing and narrow the crossing itself down to 1 lane to REALLY force people to slow the fuck down.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
  1. How does it look from the other side?
  2. How long does the effect last in a small fishing village?
[–] perestroika 8 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)
  1. How does it look under snow? :)

It is my personal opinion that a crossing is better emphasized with light from above. Snow cannot cover light.

As for bumps... there are bumps that work right (harm the suspension at speeds above the limit), and then there are bumps that harm the suspension at any speed. Road builders over here cannot seem to get them consistently right.

[–] geekwithsoul@lemm.ee 14 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Am I right in thinking this might screw with any autonomous vehicles that don't rely on LIDAR? (which I think is mainly Tesla at this point?)

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 31 points 15 hours ago

I don't think those vehicles need any help screwing up.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago
[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

Awesome but these would probably be illegal somehow in USA. I would love for some of those on our streets especially near schools.