this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
387 points (99.0% liked)

News

23367 readers
3154 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • A federal judge will let expire a temporary restraining order against the Biden administration's sweeping new student loan forgiveness plan, which could deliver relief to tens of millions of Americans.
  • The ruling means President Joe Biden may move forward with his administration's student loan forgiveness plan, just weeks before the November election.

🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SolarMonkey 64 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

So.. nothing actually changed, they just moved the case to Missouri. Since Missouri has a state-run program that suffers tangible harm from forgiveness, and Georgia didn’t have standing to sue.

The headlines sound really optimistic about what is basically nothingsauce. Sure they can move forward with stuff, but the situation hasn’t really changed that much.

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Which is more or less what happened the last time Biden tried to forgive student loans. Eventually Missouri was found to have standing, and all his efforts were thrown out.

Aside from a nagging feeling that it was known this was going to happen, and this was all for political talking points, I wanted to info dump.

A few tidbits from that prior lawsuit:

  • MOHELA supported loan forgiveness, although I can’t recall why. (I think it was about simplifying administration in the face of a bunch of loans that had already paid for themselves in terms of the interest collected. At this point the cost to maintain the loan on their books and or chase accounts they can’t write off is more expensive than attempting to recover the loan.)
  • MOHELA refused to be a plaintiff, and it was the state of Missouri claiming standing.
  • The state of Missouri only had standing due to a voluntary agreement where MOHELA would pay a certain percentage of revenue back to the state of Missouri - something it had not done for nearly a decade. Missouri’s standing was merely technical, and more or less un-realized.
  • Yet it still was used to fuck over millions of people, because Misery loves company.
[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So many consequential Supreme Court cases lately being decided even though there shouldn't ever have been standing... They all seemed to go one way too....

[–] LucidNightmare@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thank you for this. I got excited for a moment. I should know better by now.

[–] SolarMonkey 7 points 1 month ago

Yeah, so did I, so I went looking at a few sources, and the takeaway from all of them is what’s above.

The articles are all pretty sparse on detail, but clearly trying to downplay that nothing tangibly changed, and I really don’t fully understand why, when this sort of thing often gets skewered. Maybe because it’s breaking news, and the negativity/reality is yet to come? Maybe it’s a sort of media focus shift toward that stuff actually happening?

Either way, this is definitely one of those “just have to wait and see how this move plays out” sort of things, because it could be great, as the headlines indicate, or it could be the same bullshit all over.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

"Tangible harm." Right. Despite the company itself (MOHELA) stating it had no involvement in the original suit that named them as a plaintiff, and as a company that exists solely to process government paperwork, they have no opinion on the matter.

They said this, but it did not matter. The main plaintiff of the case that went to the Supreme Court, didn't even want to be a part of it. They were just a pawn for Boomer Republicans who greedily ate up billions in PPP loans that they may or may not have needed, before pulling the ladder up behind them and making sure nobody else can get anything remotely similar.

Fuck all of these people.

[–] bane_killgrind 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wonder if they can send a representative and make a motion to dismiss it.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Wouldn't matter. The Biden admin can move to dismiss without them. The motion is decided on the merits, which means it isn't stronger just because it has Mohela's signature on it.

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Tl;dr “What if we took some bullshit from over HERE and moved it over THERE”

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

I just assume I'll have to specify my student loan in my will at this point to hand off to the next family member. Mine is almost old enough to buy beer now.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

I'm still voting Democrat no matter what. LOL. I would have to get some sort of brain amoeba infection 🤧 to turn republican. But it doesn't matter either because we don't vote for the president. The electoral college does the voting. We just gotta live with the assholes they vote for.

The only way student loans will ever be forgiven is forgiving ourselves for not paying them

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee -3 points 1 month ago

I’ve been really naughty. Forgive me, Brandon!