this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
615 points (99.5% liked)

HistoryPorn

4802 readers
93 users here now

If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.

Relive the Past in Jaw-Dropping Detail!

HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  9. No genocide or atrocity denialism.

Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts

Illustrations and paintings should go to History Drawings

Related Communities:

Military Porn

Forgotten Weapons

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I looked all over for a date and got everything from "early 1800s" to "late 1800s" but nothing exact, so I had to make an educated guess. The first cameras practical enough to take such a photo were developed around 1840 and the excavations began in 1867.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 101 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Damn, this really puts into perspective for me that the sphinx was once in the center of a thriving and powerful civilization that completely died. All of that sand accumulated over thousands of years wiping out every trace of the world that used to be there and we only have evidence for it in the handful of mega structures they managed to build in an ocean of nature identical to any other undeveloped part of earth.

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 71 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I met a traveler from an antique land,
Who said—“Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert. . . . Near them, on the sand,
Half sunk a shattered visage lies, whose frown,
And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,
Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
The hand that mocked them, and the heart that fed;
And on the pedestal, these words appear:
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal Wreck, boundless and bare
The lone and level sands stretch far away.”

  • Percy Shelley
[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fun fact: Shelley wrote that poem in a friendly competition with Horace Smith. Here is Smith's version:

In Egypt's sandy silence, all alone,
Stands a gigantic Leg, which far off throws
The only shadow that the Desert knows:—
"I am great OZYMANDIAS," saith the stone,
"The King of Kings; this mighty City shows
The wonders of my hand."— The City's gone,—
Naught but the Leg remaining to disclose
The site of this forgotten Babylon.

We wonder — and some Hunter may express
Wonder like ours, when thro' the wilderness
Where London stood, holding the Wolf in chace,
He meets some fragment huge, and stops to guess
What powerful but unrecorded race
Once dwelt in that annihilated place.

— Horace Smith, "Ozymandias"

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That is beautiful as well!

I kinda like it better since it makes the same criticism of people who think their works will last forever, but then goes a step further and exposes the same fallacy in modern peoples.

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 51 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Born too late to discover ancient ruins.

Born too early to discover urban ruins.

Born just in time to watch the world die.

Imagine being an early explorer and being one of the first people to see it since the fall of the Egypt. I don't know how close they were to populated settlements, but just... imagine finding a structure no one has seen in hundreds, possibly thousands of years. It'd make the imagination go wild.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago

i was getting ready for forty winks

when, lo, up popped this post on the Sphinx;

that ensued in a long stroll

down the wikipedia rabbithole

and a whole host of now-purple hyperlinks.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Thanks. I'm really annoyed I can't accurately date it though.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 49 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Why didn't you just look at the metadata? It appears this photo was taken in the year "© All Rights Reserved"

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Big "It appears you have internet network connectivity problems" energy

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I felt that copyrighting it in the year nothing might have been a typo.

Also, there's absolutely no question that it's public domain.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

A good year for art it was.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Maybe, between two excavations, the wind has partly filled up the cavity of the previous excavation with sand and thus, the progress wasn't continuous.

This is supposedly from 1867 - 1878:
Sphinx 1878
Wikimedia Commons

[–] gnu@lemmy.zip 37 points 1 month ago

I find it a bit amusing that the sepia toning effectively colourised the image.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I thought it was a scifi spaceship at first

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Por que no los dos?

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

It is based on Goa'uld technology...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Subverb@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Couldn't find the date?

Did you check the EXIF data?

[–] Zip2@feddit.uk 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The exif data is all in hieroglyphics.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FiveTimbers@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

I too was trying to find the date of this photo this week. To narrow your time span, the first aerial photograph (also from a balloon) was taken in 1858 in France. So this photo had to have been taken after that point.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago

Fits-sits rule.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Why on earth would they need to excavate a balloon?

[–] sxan@midwest.social 11 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Is it just a fabrication that Germans in WWII shot off the nose, then? Because it looks as if it's already missing the nose here.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

As far as I know, that is a myth. It fell off in antiquity.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/_0lMkRuk5Dvs/SByi3Ct3GsI/AAAAAAAAAqU/u19MTzxnm4k/s640/sphinx+nose.png
Allegedly, it happened around 50 B.C.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Crazy that we're closer to Asterix's time than they were to when the Sphinx was built.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Cocaine or a Michael Jackson thing?

[–] cheddar@programming.dev 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

It's true. Hitler wanted to move the Sphinx to his base on the other side of the moon. Of course, moving the whole thing would be too difficult, so they only took the nose.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hah.

Just in case, though, I'll clarify: what I'd heard was that, when the German army was in Egypt in WWII, some German soldiers used the nose for target practice and pulverized it. No aliens required.

Edit: I'm remembering the story wrong: the target practice thing is attributed to Napoleon's troops using the nose as target practice for cannon. It'd unsubstantiated in either case; it turns out no one alive really knows.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Strangely the recent documentation doesn't mention that.

[–] cheddar@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago

recent documentation

uploaded 15 years ago

I hate to break it to you, but this information is heavily outdated.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

https://www.smithsonianjourneys.org/blogs/blog/2020/05/20/photo-what-happened-to-the-sphinxs-nose/

It is possible it was destroyed by a Muslim for religious reasons though it is impossible to truly confirm.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

As the article is lacking some information, here is a translstion of a part of the German Wikipedia article:

The Arab historian and physician Abd al-Latif al-Baghdadi (1161-1231) from Baghdad described the Great Sphinx and its magnificent nose in the 13th century. In the Middle Ages, the sphinx was still worshipped as a god by some sections of the population, while devout Muslims abhorred this cult. In Arab times, the Sphinx was given the name أبو الهول / Abū l-Haul, which means "father of terror". In one of his books, the Arab historian Al-Maqrīzī (1364-1442) reports that the devout sheikh of a Cairo Sufi monastery, Mohammed Saim el-Dar (Muhammad Şā'im ad-Dahr, English: "Someone who fasts all the time"), was a fanatical iconoclast who cut off the nose of the sphinx in 1378 and was then killed by the angry crowd.

The Danish artist Frederick Ludewick Norden (1708-1742) produced engravings of various Egyptian buildings in 1738 on the orders of King Christian VI. Among them was one with the buried Sphinx (Tête colossale du Sphinx), which also shows the head without a nose (published in French in 1755). The rumour that either Napoleon Bonaparte's soldiers or those of the Ottoman Empire destroyed the nose during artillery exercises has thus been proven false. Napoleon was an enthusiast of Egypt, describing the country as the "cradle of the sciences and arts of all mankind" (l'Égypte - le berceau de la science et des arts de toute l'humanité). The scientists who came to the country with him also drew the Sphinx without a nose.

TLDR: As the Great Sphinx still has had its nose around 1200 A.D. and was already noseless in 1738, its nose must have been destroyed in the meantime, supposedly by some furious sheikh in 1378.

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Imagine being so furious and pathetic to destroy the nose of a statue 3+ thousand years old.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Senshi@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

The Germans never got even close to where the sphinx is located in WW2. The Allied stopped the Axis advance in North Africa hundreds of kilometres west of there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] user1234@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 1 month ago

I can't find a date.

Have you tried tinder?

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

There's a hole in its head

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Black as your soul

I'd rather die than give you control

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

From a quick glance the pic looks a bit like the sand cruiser they used to throw Luke into the sarlacc pit.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Is it weird that I love this photo a lot more than I feel anything at all for the statue itself?

load more comments
view more: next ›